| Literature DB >> 33207613 |
Diana Pacheco1, Glacio Souza Araújo2, João Cotas1, Rui Gaspar1, João M Neto1, Leonel Pereira1.
Abstract
The introduction of exotic organisms in marine ecosystems can lead to economic and ecological losses. Globally, seaweeds represent a significant part of these non-indigenous species (NIS), with 407 introduced algal species. Furthermore, the presence of NIS seaweeds has been reported as a major concern worldwide since the patterns of their potential invasion mechanisms and vectors are not yet fully understood. Currently, in the Iberian Peninsula, around 50 NIS seaweeds have been recorded. Some of these are also considered invasive due to their overgrowth characteristic and competition with other species. However, invasive seaweeds are suitable for industrial applications due to their high feedstock. Hence, seaweeds' historical use in daily food diet, allied to research findings, showed that macroalgae are a source of nutrients and bioactive compounds with nutraceutical properties. The main goal of this review is to evaluate the records of NIS seaweeds in the Iberian Peninsula and critically analyze the potential of invasive seaweeds application in the food industry.Entities:
Keywords: edible seaweeds; food industry; marine invasions; non-indigenous seaweed species; nutritional value
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33207613 PMCID: PMC7697577 DOI: 10.3390/md18110560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Exotic seaweed species recorded in the Iberian Peninsula. R–Rhodophyta; O–Ochrophyta; C–Chlorophyta.
| Phylum | Species | Spain | Portugal | Native Habitat | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | x | Australia | [ | ||
| R | x | Canada | [ | ||
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | x | Australia | [ | |
| R | x | x | Australia | [ | |
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | Stoltenhoff Island (South Atlantic) | [ | ||
| R | x | - | [ | ||
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | Japan | [ | ||
| R | x | x | Australia | [ | |
| R | x | Japan | [ | ||
| R | x | x | Australia | [ | |
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | Adriatic | [ | ||
| R | x | North America (North Carolina) | [ | ||
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | Egypt (Suez channel) | [ | ||
| R | x | x | North America (Connecticut) | [ | |
| R | x | Japan | [ | ||
| R | x | Japan or Korea | [ | ||
| R | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| R | x | x | Australia | [ | |
| R | x | New Zealand | [ | ||
| R | x | Hawaii | [ | ||
| O | x | x | Pacific coast of North America | [ | |
| O | x | Australia | [ | ||
| O | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| O | x | North America (California) | [ | ||
| O | x | Egypt (Sinai Peninsula) | [ | ||
| O | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| O | x | Mediterranean | [ | ||
| C | x | Australia | [ | ||
| C | x | India | [ | ||
| C | x | Australia | [ | ||
| C | x | Egypt | [ | ||
| C | x | x | Japan | [ | |
| C | x | Japan | [ |
Figure 1Seaweed (Pyropia sp.) pie with carrot and coconut.
Figure 2Agarophyton vermiculophyllum collected in an aquaculture fish tank at Ria de Aveiro (Portugal).
Figure 3Underwater photography of Grateloupia turuturu in Buarcos Bay (Figueira da Foz, Portugal).
Asparagopsis taxiformis nutritional characterization from biomass collected in different sampling sites. ND–Non-determined.
| Harvesting Site | Lipids | Proteins | Carbohydrates | Ash | Moisture | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madeira Archipelago (% DW) | 6.62 | 23.76 | 32.47 | N.D. | 4.50 | [ |
| Hawaii (%) | 4 | 6.1 | 13.2 | 36 | 90.03 | [ |
| Egypt (% DW) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 17.9 | ND | ND | [ |
Micronutrient and trace element composition of the red seaweeds G. turuturu, A. armata, and A. taxiformis according to Rodrigues et al. (2015), Roque et al. (2019), and Selmi et al. (2020) [70,76,77], and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element according to the European Food Safety Authority (ND–Non-determined; (a) % DW; (b) mg/day; (c) mg/kg bw/week).
| Element | Element Concentration (mg/g DW) | NVR (mg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Micronutrients | K | 20 | ND | 0.13784 | 2000 |
| Mg | 2 | 1.38 (a) | ND | 375 | |
| Ca | 2.65 | 4.47 (a) | ND | 800 | |
| Na | 96.08 | 9.36 (a) | 0.200 | 600 | |
| P | 2.81 | 0.27 (a) | 0.03593 | 700 | |
| Trace elements | Cu | 0.01 | ND | 0.48 | 1 |
| Zn | 0.07 | ND | ND | 10 | |
| Fe | 0.05 | 1.188 | 0.2189 | 14 | |
| Mn | 0.02 | 0.0623 | 0.00305 | 2 | |
| B | 0.02 | 0.0663 | ND | 10 (b) | |
| Al | 0.01 | 0.0133 | ND | 1 (c) | |
| As | ND | ND | 4 × 10−4 | 0.015 (c) | |
| Cd | ND | ND | 2 × 10−5 | 0.007 (c) | |
| Hg | ND | ND | 2 × 10−5 | 0.004 (c) | |
| Pb | ND | ND | 5.1 × 10−4 | 0.005 (c) | |
Figure 4Underwater photo of Asparagopsis armata in São Martinho do Porto (Portugal).
Figure 5Underwater photo of Asparagopsis taxiformis in Terceira island (Azores archipelago -Portugal).
Figure 6Colpomenia peregrina in São Martinho do Porto (Portugal).
Micronutrients and trace elements in the composition of Colpomenia peregrina in South West England (U.K.) according to Beacham et al. (2019) [118] and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element according to the European Food Safety Authority (a) mg/day; (b) mg/kg bw/week).
| Biochemical profile | Element | Concentration (mg/g) | NVR (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micronutrients | K | 46.93 | 2000 |
| P | 0.67 | 700 | |
| Ca | 55.64 | 800 | |
| Trace Elements | Cu | 0.02 | 1 |
| Zn | 0.05 | 10 | |
| Sn | 0.05 | 0.055 | |
| Mn | 0.23 | 2 | |
| Si | 252.29 | 20–50 (a) | |
| Al | 19.61 | 1 (b) | |
| Fe | 9.31 | 14 |
Figure 7Sargassum muticum in Buarcos Bay (Figueira da Foz, Portugal).
Sargassum muticum nutritional characterization from biomass collected in different sampling sites. ND–Non-determined.
| Harvesting Site | Lipids | Proteins | Carbohydrates | Ash | Moisture | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.K. (% DW) | 1.6 | 4.64 | 69 | 26.4 | ND | [ |
| India (% FW) | 0.12 | 5.31 | 39.25 | 16.90 | 87.91 | [ |
| Spain (% DW) | 1.6–3.2 | 7–22 | 27.9–44.5 | 13.2–30.5 | ND | [ |
| Portugal (% DW) | 1.45 | 16.9 | 49.3 | 22.94 | 9.64 | [ |
Micronutrients and trace elements composition of Sargassum muticum harvested in the U.K. [118], India [132], and Spain [133] and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element, according to the European Food Safety Authority. ND–Non-dentermined; (a) mg/kg bw/week.
| Biochemical Profile | Element (mg/g) | Country | NVR (mg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.K. | India | Spain | |||
| Micronutrients | K | 75.76 | 13 | 26.25 | 2000 |
| P | 1.34 | 0.4528 | ND | 700 | |
| Ca | 11.2 | 15.256 | 47.15 | 800 | |
| Na | ND | ND | 13.75 | 600 | |
| Trace Elements | Fe | 0.08 | 0.537 | 0.9 | 14 |
| Sn | 0.06 | ND | ND | 0.055 | |
| Mn | 0.01 | 0.025 | 0.03 | 2 | |
| Al | 0.28 | ND | ND | 1 (a) | |
| Cu | ND | 0.003 | 0.0155 | 1 | |
| Zn | 0.01 | 0.128 | 0.02675 | 10 | |
| Cr | ND | 0.005 | ND | 0.04 | |
| Mo | ND | 0.001 | ND | 0.05 | |
| I | ND | ND | 0.0077 | 0.15 | |
| Ars | ND | ND | 0.0216 | 0.015 (a) | |
Figure 8Undaria pinnatifida in Buarcos Bay (Portugal).
Undaria pinnatifida nutritional macronutrient characterization from biomass collected in different sampling sites. ND–Not determined.
| Harvesting Site | Lipids | Proteins | Carbohydrates | Fibers | Ash | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan (Commercial sample % DW) | 3.13 | 14.21 | 45.08 | ND. | 37.58 | [ |
| Japan (% DW) | 3.2 | 15 | 35.3 | 2.7 | 30.8 | [ |
| Spain (% DW) | 1 | 16.8 | 37 | 14.9 | 28.3 | [ |
| New Zealand (% DW) | 3.30 | 19.66 | 50.4 | ND | 26.58 | [ |
Undaria pinnatifida micronutrients and trace elements characterization comparatively to the native and invasive site according to the literature [153,155] and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element, according to the European Food Safety Authority. ND–Non-determined; (a) µg/kg bw/d.
| Biochemical Profile | Element (mg/100g DW) | Country | NVR (mg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Spain | |||
| Micronutrients | K | 5691 | 5679 | 2000 |
| P | 450 | 1070 | 700 | |
| Ca | 950 | 693.2 | 800 | |
| Mg | 405 | 630.2 | 375 | |
| Na | 6494 | 3511 | 600 | |
| Trace Elements | Mn | 0.332 | 0.69 | 2 |
| Ni | 0.265 | ND | 2.8 (a) | |
| Cu | 0.185 | 0,19 | 1 | |
| Zn | 0.944 | 3,86 | 10 | |
| Cr | 0.072 | ND | 0.04 | |
| I | 26 | 9.6 | 0.15 | |
Figure 9Underwater photography of C. racemosa in the Spanish islands.
Micronutrients and trace elements in the composition of Caulerpa racemosa in India, according to Kumar et al. (2001) [170], and the nutrient value reference (NVR) for each element, according to the European Food Safety Authority.
| Biochemical Profile | Element | Concentration (% DW) | NVR (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micronutrients | K | 5.03 | 2000 |
| Ca | 4.76 | 800 | |
| Mg | 4.161 | 375 | |
| Na | 10.64 | 600 | |
| Trace Elements | Fe | 29.71 | 14 |
| Mn | 4.91 | 2 | |
| Mo | 0.15 | 0.05 | |
| Cu | 0.62 | 1 | |
| Zn | 6.82 | 10 | |
| Se | 0.13 | 0.055 |