| Literature DB >> 34944333 |
Yu-Lun Pan1, Maria João Rodrigues1, Catarina G Pereira1, Sofia Engrola1, Rita Colen1, Inês Mansinhos2, Anabela Romano2, Paula B Andrade3, Fátima Fernandes3, Luísa Custódio1.
Abstract
Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger were profiled for proximate composition, minerals, amino acids, fatty acids (FA), carotenoids, radical scavenging activity on the 2,2-diphenyl-1- picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and iron and copper chelating properties. Microcosmus squamiger had the highest level of moisture and crude protein, S. spallanzanii was enriched in crude fat and ash. Both species had similar levels of carbohydrates and energy. There was a prevalence of arginine and glycine in S. spallanzanii, and of taurine in M. squamiger. The most abundant minerals in both species were Na, Ca, and K. The methanol extract of S. spallanzanii had metal chelating properties towards copper and iron, while the methanol extract of M. squamiger was able to chelate copper. M. squamiger extracts had similar ORAC values. Fucoxanthinol and fucoxanthin were the major carotenoids in the M. squamiger dichloromethane extract. Saturated FA were more abundant than unsaturated ones in methanol extracts, and unsaturated FA prevailed in the dichloromethane extracts. Palmitic acid was the predominant FA in methanol extracts, whereas eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and dihomo-γ-linolenic acids were the major compounds in dichloromethane extracts. Low n-6/n-3 ratios were obtained. Our results suggests that both species could be explored as sources of bioactive ingredients with multiple applications.Entities:
Keywords: carotenoids; fatty acids; marine biotechnology; marine invertebrates; natural antioxidants; nutritional profile
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944333 PMCID: PMC8697903 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Figure 1Collected specimens of Sabella spallanzanii (A) and Microcosmus squamiger (B). (Photo by Yu Lun-Pan).
Proximate composition and energetic value of the biomass of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger.
| Item |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 70.7 ± 1.0 | 88.9 ± 0.8 |
| Ash (%) | 53.1 ± 4.8 | 36.2 ± 4.6 |
| Protein (%, dw) | 47.2 ± 0.3 | 53.9 ± 2.6 |
| Fat (%, dw) | 11.7 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 0.1 |
| Carbohydrates (%, dw) | 41.1 ± 1.4 | 40.8 ± 2.6 |
| Energetic value (kcal/100 g, dw) | 475.8 ± 8.1 | 445.6 ± 0.4 |
Data represent the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 3). dw: dry weight.
Amino acid profile of the biomass of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger.
| Amino Acid | Abbreviation |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Arginine | Arg | 68.5 ± 0.33 | 1.65 ± 0.01 |
| Histidine | His | 0.27 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.01 |
| Lysine | Lys | 0.25 ± 0.00 | 1.29 ± 0.02 |
| Threonine | Thr | 0.69 ± 0.00 | 1.31 ± 0.02 |
| Isoleucine | Ile | 0.12 ± 0.00 | 0.17 ± 0.00 |
| Leucine | Leu | 0.20 ± 0.00 | 0.27 ± 0.00 |
| Valine | Val | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.73 ± 0.00 |
| Tryptophan | Trp | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.23 ± 0.00 |
| Methionine | Met | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.85 ± 0.01 |
| Phenylalanine | Phe | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.25 ± 0.00 |
| Cysteine | Cys | 0.08 ± 0.00 | 0.15 ± 0.00 |
| Tyrosine | Tyr | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 0.33 ± 0.00 |
| Aspartic acid | Asp | 1.39 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.03 |
| Asparagine | Asn | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.67 ± 0.01 |
| Glutamic acid | Glu | 2.02 ± 0.02 | 2.41 ± 0.05 |
| Glutamine | Gln | 1.71 ± 0.01 | 0.88 ± 0.00 |
| Alanine | Ala | 1.06 ± 0.00 | 2.94 ± 0.03 |
| Glycine | Gly | 49.3 ± 0.16 | 1.72 ± 0.03 |
| Proline | Pro | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 5.15 ± 0.06 |
| Serine | Ser | 0.62 ± 0.00 | 0.82 ± 0.01 |
| Taurine | Tau | 2.30 ± 0.07 | 26.6 ± 0.46 |
| Ornithine | Orn | 0.19 ± 0.00 | 0.65 ± 0.01 |
| gamma-Amino-n-butyric acid | GABA | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.45 ± 0.01 |
| Hydroxyproline | HPro | 0.18 ± 0.00 | 0.95 ± 0.00 |
| beta-Alanine | B-Ala | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 0.23 ± 0.00 |
| TOTAL | 131.76 ± 0.66 | 52.42 ± 0.78 |
Data represent the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 2) and is expressed as mg/g dry weight (dw).
Mineral content of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger.
| Mineral | Symbol |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Macroelements | |||
| Sodium | Na | 18.65 ± 0.26 | 36.24 ± 0.64 |
| Calcium | Ca | 17.09 ± 0.38 | 14.29 ± 1.11 |
| Potassium | K | 15.14 ± 0.10 | 11.88 ± 0.36 |
| Magnesium | Mg | 6.66 ± 0.05 | 6.75 ± 0.14 |
| Phosphorus | P | 3.97 ± 0.01 | 2.66 ± 0.15 |
| Microelements | |||
| Iron | Fe | 12.12 ± 0.17 | 4.42 ± 0.30 |
| Selenium | Se | nd | nd |
| Manganese | Mn | nd | 0.41 ± 0.02 |
| Molybdenum | Mo | nd | nd |
| Aluminum | Al | 13.10 ± 0.27 | 4.60 ± 0.17 |
| Lithium | Li | nd | nd |
| Vanadium | V | 11.6 ± 0.43 | 4.63 ± 0.17 |
| Toxic elements | |||
| Chromium | Cr | nd | nd |
| Copper | Cu | nd. | nd |
| Zinc | Zn | nd | nd |
| Cadmium | Cd | nd | nd |
| Nickel | Ni | nd | nd |
| Lead | Pb | nd | nd |
| Mercury | Hg | nd | nd |
| Thorium | Th | 0.28 ± 0.07 | 0.48 ± 0.05 |
| TOTAL | 98.61 | 86.36 |
Data represents the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 3) and values are expressed as mg/g dry weight (dw). nd: not detected.
Fatty acid content of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger extracts (µg/mg dry extract, dw) 1.
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | Common Name | Peak | Dichloromethane Extract | Methanol Extract | Dichloromethane Extract | Methanol Extract | ||||
| µg/mg, dw | Relative% | µg/mg, dw | Relative% | µg/mg, dw | Relative% | µg/mg, dw | Relative% | |||
| SFA | ||||||||||
| C11:0 | Undecylic acid | 1 | – | – | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.3 | – | – | – | – |
| C12:0 | Lauric acid | 2 | nq | nq | nq | nq | – | – | nq | nq |
| C13:0 | Tridecyclic acid | 3 | – | – | nq | nq | – | – | nq | nq |
| C14:0 | Myristic acid | 5 | 33.71 ± 4.10 | 7.3 | 3.11 ± 0.14 | 17.4 | 8.61 ± 0.22 | 3.3 | 1.00 ± 0.04 | 5.3 |
| C15:0 | Pentadecyclic acid | 7 | 5.36 ± 0.09 | 1.2 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 2.6 | 2.75 ± 0.19 | 1.0 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 2.6 |
| C16:0 | Palmitic acid | 9 | 89.35 ± 7.13 | 19.5 | 5.21 ± 0.13 | 24.2 | 43.55 ± 1.57 | 16.5 | 6.32 ± 0.81 | 33.1 |
| C17:0 | Margaric acid | 11 | 3.87 ± 0.26 | 0.8 | 0.52 ± 0.07 | 2.4 | 5.47 ± 0.83 | 2.1 | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 4.3 |
| C18:0 | Stearic acid | 16 | 18.54 ± 3.25 | 4.0 | 2.18 ± 0.18 | 10.1 | 15.63 ± 1.31 | 5.9 | 3.02 ± 0.35 | 15.8 |
| C20:0 | Arachidic acid | 22 | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.43 ± 0.09 | 2.0 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | 0.2 | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 1.8 |
| C21:0 | Heneicosylic acid | 23 | nq | – | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 1.8 | nq | nq | 0.74 ± 0.07 | 3.9 |
| C22:0 | Behenic acid | 27 | 0.33 ± 0.10 | 0.1 | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq |
| C23:0 | Tricosylic acid | 28 | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.1 |
| C24:0 | Lignoceric acid | 30 | – | – | nq | nq | nq | nq | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Σ SFA | 151.91 ± 15.01 | 33.1 | 12.47 ± 1.60 | 57.8 | 76.41 ± 4.13 | 30.4 | 12.78 ± 1.48 |
| ||
| MUFA | ||||||||||
| C14:1 | Myristoleic acid | 4 | nq | nq | – | – | – | – | nq | nq |
| C15:1 | cis-10-Pentadecenoic acid | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | nq | nq |
| C16:1 | Palmitoleic acid | 8 | 44.64 ± 3.10 | 9.7 | 1.52 ± 0.12 | 7.0 | 20.46 ± 2.99 | 3.0 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 5.1 |
| C17:1 | cis-10-Heptadecenoic acid | 10 | – | – | – | – | – | – | nq | nq |
| C18:1 | Oleic acid | 14 | 20.42 ± 1.25 | 4.4 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 1.5 | 9.20 ± 0.30 | 3.5 | 0.72 ± 0.06 | 3.8 |
| C18:1 | Elaidic acid | 15 | 32.34 ± 1.25 | 7.0 | 1.68 ± 0.13 | 7.8 | 25.65 ± 3.73 | 9.7 | 2.56 ± 0.28 | 13.4 |
| C22:1 | Erucic acid | 26 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.1 | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq |
| C24:1 | Nervonic acid | 29 | 0.43 ± 0.09 | 0.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Σ MUFA | 98.31 ± 5.75 | 21.4 | 3.53 ± 0.39 | 16.4 | 55.31 ± 7.01 | 22.0 | 4.25 ± 0.43 |
| ||
| PUFA | ||||||||||
| C18:2 | Linoleic acid | 13 | 4.35 ± 0.08 | 0.9 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.2 | 8.39 ± 0.34 | 3.2 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 3.5 |
| C18:2 | Linoelaidic acid | 25 | 2.42 ± 0.35 | 0.5 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.3 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.1 | nq | 0 |
| C20:2 | Eicosadienoic acid | 20 | 23.27 ± 3.44 | 5.1 | 0.94 ± 0.07 | 4.4 | 0.32 ± 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.3 |
| C18:3 | γ-Linolenic acid | 12 | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq |
| C18:3 | α-Linolenic acid | 21 | 10.08 ± 0.86 | 2.2 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 2.0 | 0.46 ± 0.10 | 0.2 | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.7 |
| C20:3 | Homo-γ-Linolenic acid | 19 | 124.69 ± 11.8 | 27.2 | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq | nq |
| C20:4 | Arachidonic acid | 17 | 21.24 ± 2.69 | 4.6 | 1.17 ± 0.02 | 5.4 | 11.20 ± 0.93 | 4.2 | 0.39 ± 0.04 | 2.1 |
| C20:5 | Eicosapentaenoic acid | 18 | * | * | 2.39 ± 0.34 | 11.1 | 59.11 ± 8.87 | 22.4 | 0.56 ± 0.05 | 2.9 |
| C22:6 | Docosahexaenoic acid | 24 | 22.97 ± 3.23 | 5.0 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 2.4 | 39.92 ± 6.67 | 15.1 | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 1.2 |
| Σ PUFA | 209.03 ± 22.45 | 45.5 | 5.56 ± 0.69 | 25.8 | 119.64 ± 17.01 | 47.6 | 2.05 ± 0.18 | 10.7 | ||
| Σ | 33.05 ± 4.09 | 7.2 | 3.34 ± 0.58 | 15.5 | 99.48 ± 5.64 | 39.6 | 0.92 ± 0.09 | 4.8 | ||
| Σ | nq | nq | nd | nd | nd | nd | nq | nq | ||
| Σ | 175.98 ± 18.36 | 38.2 | 2.22 ± 0.11 | 10.3 | 20.16 ± 1.37 | 8.0 | 1.13 ± 0.09 | 5.9 | ||
| Σ | 44.64 ± 3.1 | 9.7 | 1.52 ± 0.12 | 7.0 | 20.46 ± 2.99 | 8.1 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 5.1 | ||
| Σ | 53.67 | 11.7 | 2.01 ± 0.27 | 9.3 | 34.85 ± 4.02 | 13.9 | 3.29 ± 0.34 | 17.2 | ||
| 5.33 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 1.23 | |||||||
| TOTAL | 459.25 ± 43.20 | 100.0 | 21.56 ± 2.68 | 100.0 | 251.34 ± 28.15 | 100.0 | 19.09 ± 2.09 | 100.0 | ||
1 Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3), as µg/mg dry weight (dw). SFA: saturated fatty acid; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid; nq: not quantified; “–“: not detected; ∑ sum. * Quantified with C20:3 (19).
Figure 2Representative GC-FID chromatogram of the fatty acid profile of Microcosmus squamiger methanol extract. (1) Undecylic acid (C11:0); (2) lauric acid (C12:0); (3) tridecyclic acid (C13:0); (4) myristoleic acid (C14:1); (5) myristic acid (C14:0); (6) cis-10-pentadecenoic acid (C15:1); (7) pentadecyclic acid (C15:0); (8) palmitoleic acid (C16:1); (9) palmitic acid (C16:0); (10) cis-10-heptadecenoic acid (C17:1); (11) margaric acid (C17:0); (12) γ-linolenic acid (C18:3); (13) linoleic acid (C18:2); (14) oleic acid (C18:1); (15) elaidic acid (C18:1); (16) stearic acid (C18:0); (17) arachidonic acid (C20:4); (18) eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5); (19) homo-γ-linolenic acid (C20:3); (20) eicosadienoic acid (C20:2); (21) α-linolenic acid (C18:3); (22) arachidic acid (C20:0); (23) heneicosylic acid (C21:0); (24) docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6); (25) linoelaidic acid (C18:2); (26) erucic acid (C22:1); (27) behenic acid (C22:0); (28) tricosylic acid (C23:0); (29) nervonic acid (C24:1); (30) lignoceric acid (C24:0).
Carotenoid content of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger extracts (µg/g dry extract) 1.
| Peak | Compound |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dicloromethane Extract | Methanol Extract | Dicloromethane Extract | Methanol Extract | ||
| 1 | Fucoxanthinol | 2.51 ± 0.28 | nd | nd | nd |
| 2 | Fucoxanthin | 1.66 ± 0.06 | nd | nd | nd |
| 3 | Anteraxanthin | nq | nd | nd | nd |
| 4 | Astaxanthin | 0.03 ± 0.00 | nd | nd | nd |
| 5 | Lutein | 0.14 ± 0.01 | nd | nd | nd |
| 6 | Zeaxanthin | nq | nd | nd | nd |
| TOTAL | 4.34 ± 0.35 | – | – | – | |
1 Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3), as µg/g dry weight (dw). nq: not quantified; nd: not detected. Peaks refers to the HPLC-DAD profile depicted in Figure 3.
Figure 3HPLC-DAD carotenoid profile of the dichloromethane extract from Microcosmus squamiger. Identity of compounds as in Table 5.
Extraction yields (%), DPPH radical scavenging activity and metal chelating activities on iron (ICA) and copper (CCA) (IC50, mg/mL) of dichloromethane and methanol extracts of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger.
| Samples | Extract | Yield (%) | DPPH | ICA | CCA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Dichloromethane | 5.06 | nr | nr | nr |
| Methanol | 6.32 | nr | 4.1 ± 0.1 b | 1.7 ± 0.0 c | |
|
| Dichloromethane | 2.42 | nr | nr | >1 nr |
| Methanol | 15.65 | nr | nr | 7.6 ± 0.2 b | |
| BHA * | - | - | 0.1 ± 0.0 | - | - |
| EDTA * | - | - | - | 0.1 ± 0.0 a | 0.6 ± 0.0 a |
Data represents the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 6). In the same column, values followed by different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test); nr: IC50 value not reached; * positive control; BHA: butylated hydroxyanisole; EDTA: ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Figure 4Antioxidant activity (mg trolox equivalents TE/g) determined by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assays in dichloromethane and methanol extracts of Sabella spallanzanii and Microcosmus squamiger. For the same species, collumns labelled with different letters re significantly different (p < 0.05).