| Literature DB >> 33202065 |
Chloe Cavagnetto1, Richard Alejo Blanco1, Hollie McKenna2, Laura Willmott1, Elif Aydogdu3, Nicola Akinyemi3, Helena Standring3, Simon Procter3, Johan W Lagerberg4, Elin Johansson5, Harry Croxon5, Dirk de Korte4, Stephen F Garner1, Atsushi Shirakami6, Jarob Saker6, Joachim Linssen6, Rebecca Cardigan1,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Manufacture of platelet concentrates (PCs) and plasma may fail to remove all residual red blood cells (rRBCs). Measuring rRBCs for compliance to guidelines has proven challenging, leading to an absence of a consensus methodology. Sysmex hematology analyzers with the Blood Bank mode (BB mode) analysis option offer the potential for automated rRBC counting. We therefore performed a two-site appraisal of the system. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Performance characteristics were determined using platelet and plasma samples spiked with RBCs. Sample stability (n = 47) and the impact of sample type were also assessed. Components (platelets, n = 1474; plasma, n = 77) prepared using different routine manufacturing methods were tested to assess variation in rRBC concentration.Entities:
Keywords: blood components; haematology analyser; residual red cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33202065 PMCID: PMC7894184 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transfusion ISSN: 0041-1132 Impact factor: 3.157
FIGURE 1Schematic of assessment protocol. Performance characteristic testing performed at (A) NHSBT CDL with use of the BB mode; and (B) Sanquin with use of the BB mode and flow cytometry. Routine manufactured components tested at (C) NHSBT CDL and Manchester with the BB mode; and (D) Sanquin with the BB mode. n = numbers of samples collected and tested
FIGURE 2Linearity studies. Linear regression of observed vs expected rRBC results. (A) Platelets, by the Sysmex XN‐1000 BB mode; and (C) plasma, by the Sysmex XN‐1000 BB mode and flow cytometry. Graphs were expanded to show greater clarity for lower cell numbers for (B) platelets, and (D) plasma. For all linearity graphs; the black solid line is the line of equivalence. (E) Results from Bland‐Altman analysis comparing PPD BB mode and flow cytometry data for plasma
Precision analysis results of Sysmex BB mode using plasma and PC samples
| Expected RBCs/μL | Platelets | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plasma | Pooled BC | Apheresis | ||||
| Observed RBCs/μL | CV | Observed RBCs/μL | CV | Observed RBCs/μL | CV | |
| 50 | 54 | 8 | – | – | 52 | 8 |
| 20‐25 | 30 | 10 | 22 | 12 | 24 | 12 |
| 13‐15 | 15 | 15 | – | – | 17 | 16 |
| 6‐7 | 8 | 21 | – | – | 7 | 16 |
For plasma n = 3, while for platelets n = 1 for each method of manufacture. Observed counts were corrected for inherent RBCs in nonspiked samples.
RBCs/μL (average for plasma).
CV (average coefficient of variation for plasma).
Not tested.
Abbreviation: PC, platelet concentrate.
LOD analysis results for the BB mode with use of samples from plasma (n = 3)
| Expected RBCs/μL | Observed RBCs in plasma | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean RBCs/μL | 95% CI | |
| 0 | 1.8 | 1.4‐2.1 |
| 6 | 8.4 | 7.7‐9.1 |
| 13 | 14.5 | 13.7‐15.4 |
| 25 | 29.5 | 28.2‐30.8 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; LOD, limit of detection.
FIGURE 3PC BB mode results from plain and EDTA tubes, and rRBC failures. (A) The range of BB mode results from EDTA (clear boxes) and plain tubes (spotted boxes), with values ≥6 and < 4000RBC/μL, taken from NHSBT Manchester paired apheresis PCs (blue box; n = 998), Sanquin PPD apheresis PCs (red box; n = 71), NHSBT Manchester paired BC‐PCs (green box; n = 99), and IBTS TACSI PCs (orange box; n = 110). Boxes represent the 25 and 75 percentile values with the horizontal bar corresponding to the median value, the whiskers the 2.5 to 97.5 percentile ranges and black full circles the outliers. (B) Regression analysis (red line) of paired EDTA and plain tube data above the LOQ from NHSBT Manchester apheresis and BC PCs (n = 1097). (C) BC derived PCs (n = 25) identified by BB mode as containing ≥4000 RBCs/μL
FIGURE 4BB mode sample stability study. rRBC BB mode results from BC PC component samples stored and tested on multiple occasions over 48 hours (plain; n = 47). For illustration purposes, numbers 1, 2 and 3 track individual samples at each time point. ns = not significant, P > 0.05
Previous studies with rRBC data
| rRBCs/μL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study reference | rRBC Method | Component | n= | Median | Mean | Range |
| Santana and Dumont | FC | PC: Aph | 193 | 17.4 | ||
| Culibrk et al | HA | PC: BC | 166 | 605 | 80‐15 040 | |
| PC: Aph | 58 | 70 | 5‐1380 | |||
| Reckhaus et al | Microscopy | PC: BC | 120a | 304 | 152‐1662 | |
| PC: Aph | 120a | 14 | 3‐80 | |||
| Lambrecht et al | FC | Plasma | 2666 | 623 | 0‐959 | |
| Backholer et al | FC | Plasma | 119 | <100 | ||
| Petersson and Ekblom | HA | Plasma | 25 | All <6000 | ||
n = based on 10 per month for a year. Actual number not given in paper.
Abbreviations: Aph, apheresis; BC, buffy coat; FC, flow cytometry; HA, hematology analyzer; PC, platelet concentrate.