Literature DB >> 33201789

Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.

Ipshita Gupta1, John R Eisenbrey1, Priscilla Machado1, Maria Stanczak1, Corinne E Wessner1, Colette M Shaw1, Sriharsha Gummadi1, Jonathan M Fenkel1, Alison Tan1, Cynthia Miller1, Julia Parent1, Susan Schultz1, Michael C Soulen1, Chandra M Sehgal1, Kirk Wallace1, Flemming Forsberg1.   

Abstract

Background The current standard for assessing the severity of portal hypertension is the invasive acquisition of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). A noninvasive US-based technique called subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) could reduce risk and enable routine acquisition of these pressure estimates. Purpose To compare quantitative SHAPE to HVPG measurements to diagnose portal hypertension in participants undergoing a transjugular liver biopsy. Materials and Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional trial conducted at two hospitals between April 2015 and March 2019 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02489045). This trial enrolled participants who were scheduled for transjugular liver biopsy. After standard-of-care transjugular liver biopsy and HVPG pressure measurements, participants received an infusion of a US contrast agent and saline. During infusion, SHAPE data were collected from a portal vein and a hepatic vein, and the difference was compared with HVPG measurements. Correlations between data sets were determined by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and statistical significance between groups was determined by using the Student t test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of SHAPE. Results A total of 125 participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 59 years ± 12; 80 men) with complete data were included. Participants at increased risk for variceal hemorrhage (HVPG ≥12 mm Hg) had a higher mean SHAPE gradient compared with participants with lower HVPGs (0.79 dB ± 2.53 vs -4.95 dB ± 3.44; P < .001), which is equivalent to a sensitivity of 90% (13 of 14; 95% CI: 88, 94) and a specificity of 80% (79 of 99; 95% CI: 76, 84). The SHAPE gradient between the portal and hepatic veins was in good overall agreement with the HVPG measurements (r = 0.68). Conclusion Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation is an accurate noninvasive technique for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kiessling in this issue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201789      PMCID: PMC7771992          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020202677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  35 in total

1.  Subharmonic backscattering from ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  P M Shankar; P D Krishna; V L Newhouse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Roberto J Groszmann; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Jaime Bosch; Norman D Grace; Andrew K Burroughs; Ramon Planas; Angels Escorsell; Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan; David Patch; Daniel S Matloff; Hong Gao; Robert Makuch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Subharmonic microbubble emissions for noninvasively tracking right ventricular pressures.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; John R Eisenbrey; Joel S Raichlen; Ji-Bin Liu; Maureen E McDonald; Kris Dickie; Shumin Wang; Corina Leung; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.

Authors:  R G Newcombe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On Factors Affecting Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE).

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Noninvasive LV pressure estimation using subharmonic emissions from microbubbles.

Authors:  Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; John R Eisenbrey; Joel S Raichlen; Ji-Bin Liu; Maureen E McDonald; Kris Dickie; Shumin Wang; Corina Leung; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01

Review 7.  A Meta-analysis for the Diagnostic Performance of Transient Elastography for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Myung-Won You; Kyung Won Kim; Junhee Pyo; Jimi Huh; Hyoung Jung Kim; So Jung Lee; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Effect of Pulse Shaping on Subharmonic Aided Pressure Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Anush Sridharan; Jaydev K Dave; Ji-Bin Liu; Christopher Hazard; Xinghua Wang; Ping Wang; Huiwen Li; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 9.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement: time to learn!

Authors:  Ashish Kumar; Praveen Sharma; Shiv Kumar Sarin
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

10.  Chronic hepatitis. An update on terminology and reporting.

Authors:  K P Batts; J Ludwig
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Authors:  Xiaoguo Li; Ning Kang; Xiaolong Qi; Yifei Huang
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Ultrasound Pressure Estimation for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Jonathan M Fenkel; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 3.  Ultrasound contrast agents: microbubbles made simple for the pediatric radiologist.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg; Norbert Lorenz; Ludwig Steffgen; Aikaterini Ntoulia
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-06-12

Review 4.  Applications of Ultrasound-Mediated Drug Delivery and Gene Therapy.

Authors:  Juliana Sitta; Candace M Howard
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Moderate-Intensity Ultrasound-Triggered On-Demand Analgesia Nanoplatforms for Postoperative Pain Management.

Authors:  Xinye Song; Mengxiao Luan; Weiyi Zhang; Ruizheng Zhang; Li Xue; Yong Luan
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2022-07-23

Review 6.  Bibliometric-analysis visualization and review of non-invasive methods for monitoring and managing the portal hypertension.

Authors:  XiaoHan Sun; Hong Bo Ni; Jian Xue; Shuai Wang; Afaf Aljbri; Liuchun Wang; Tian Hang Ren; Xiao Li; Meng Niu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-15

7.  Network Meta-Analysis: Noninvasive Imaging Modalities for Identifying Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Yang Hai; Weelic Chong; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.487

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.