Literature DB >> 30417745

On Factors Affecting Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE).

Ipshita Gupta1,2, John R Eisenbrey1, Priscilla Machado1, Maria Stanczak1, Kirk Wallace3, Flemming Forsberg1.   

Abstract

Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) estimates hydrostatic pressure using the inverse relationship with subharmonic amplitude variations of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs). We studied the impact of varying incident acoustic outputs (IAO), UCA concentration, and hematocrit on SHAPE. A Logiq 9 scanner with a 4C curvilinear probe (GE, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) was used with Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) transmitting at 2.5 MHz and receiving at 1.25 MHz. An improved IAO selection algorithm provided improved correlations ( r from -0.85 to -0.95 vs. -0.39 to -0.98). There was no significant change in SHAPE gradient as the pressure increased from 10 to 40 mmHg and hematocrit concentration was tripled from 1.8 to 4.5 mL/L (Δ0.00-0.01 dB, p = 0.18), and as UCA concentration was increased from 0.2 to 1.2 mL/L (Δ0.02-0.05 dB, p = 0.75). The results for the correlation between the SHAPE gradient and hematocrit values for patients ( N = 100) in an ongoing clinical trial were also calculated showing a poor correlation value of 0.14. Overall, the SHAPE gradient is independent of hematocrit and UCA concentration. An improved algorithm for IAO selection will make SHAPE more accurate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic power; contrast agent concentration; hematocrit; optimization; subharmonic imaging; subharmonic pressure estimation; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 30417745      PMCID: PMC6689132          DOI: 10.1177/0161734618812083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Imaging        ISSN: 0161-7346            Impact factor:   1.578


  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound Pressure Estimation for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Jonathan M Fenkel; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.754

2.  Optimal Control of SonoVue Microbubbles to Estimate Hydrostatic Pressure.

Authors:  Amanda Q X Nio; Alessandro Faraci; Kirsten Christensen-Jeffries; Jason L Raymond; Mark J Monaghan; Daniel Fuster; Flemming Forsberg; Robert J Eckersley; Pablo Lamata
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Diagnosing Portal Hypertension with Noninvasive Subharmonic Pressure Estimates from a US Contrast Agent.

Authors:  Ipshita Gupta; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Sriharsha Gummadi; Jonathan M Fenkel; Alison Tan; Cynthia Miller; Julia Parent; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Hepatic Vein Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Subharmonic Imaging Signal as a Screening Test for Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Jonathan M Fenkel; Colette M Shaw; Susan Shamini-Noori; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.487

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.