Literature DB >> 33200713

C-terminus of Hsp70 Interacting Protein (CHIP) and Neurodegeneration: Lessons from the Bench and Bedside.

Sivakami Mylvaganam1, Rebecca Earnshaw2, Gregory Heymann2, Suneil K Kalia2, Lorraine V Kalia1.   

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by the increasing dysfunction and death of neurons, resulting in progressive impairment of a person's mobility and/or cognition. Protein misfolding and aggregation are commonly hypothesized to cause neurotoxicity and, eventually, neuronal degeneration that are associated with these diseases. Emerging experimental evidence, as well as recent findings from human studies, reveal that the C-terminus of Hsp70 Interacting Protein (CHIP), or STIP1 Homology and U-box containing Protein 1 (STUB1), is a quality control protein involved in neurodegeneration. Here, we review evidence that CHIP interacts with and plays a role in regulating proteins implicated in the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and polyglutamine diseases, including Huntington's disease and spinocerebellar ataxias. We also review clinical findings identifying mutations in STUB1 as a cause of both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant forms of cerebellar ataxia. We propose that CHIP modulation may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of multiple neurodegenerative diseases. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer's disease; STUB1; STUB1-associated disease.; amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; cerebellar ataxia; huntington disease; neurodegenerative diseases; parkinson's disease; polyglutamine diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33200713      PMCID: PMC8686314          DOI: 10.2174/1570159X18666201116145507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol        ISSN: 1570-159X            Impact factor:   7.363


INTRODUCTION

Neurodegenerative diseases are chronic neurological conditions that include disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and inherited cerebellar ataxias. These diseases are all incurable at present, with no available treatments to modify the neurodegenerative process or provide neuroprotection. Age is a major risk factor for most neurodegenerative diseases and thus, without such disease-modifying or neuroprotective treatments, neurodegenerative diseases will represent an increasingly significant medical and public health concern as life expectancy increases and populations age worldwide [1, 2]. All neurodegenerative diseases are defined by progressive neuronal dysfunction and death. They are associated with a gradual decline in a person’s mobility and/or cognition. Specific symptoms of each disease reflect the neuronal populations affected and, while an explanation for the selective vulnerability of discrete neuronal populations in different disorders remains to be elucidated, mounting evidence indicates that certain cellular and molecular mechanisms are shared across these diseases. Importantly, protein misfolding and aggregation are associated with neurotoxicity and eventual neuronal loss [3]. Quality control systems exist within each cell to maintain protein homeostasis, or ‘proteostasis’. Proteostatic systems include the chaperone system, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), and autophagy-lysosomal pathway (ALP). Together these systems serve to reduce or prevent the accumulation of misfolded proteins and aggregates. Deciphering the role of quality control proteins is especially important for understanding the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases and developing disease-modifying therapies. This review discusses the role of one such quality control protein, the co-chaperone C-terminus of Hsp70 Interacting Protein (CHIP). Emerging experimental evidence, together with clinical findings, suggest that CHIP may play a critical neuroprotective role in multiple neurodegenerative diseases.

C-TERMINUS OF HSP70 INTERACTING PROTEIN (CHIP)

The chaperone system is comprised of a family of proteins, including molecular chaperones and co-chaperones, that work together to facilitate de novo protein folding as well as refolding of misfolded proteins. Chaperones, such as Heat Shock Protein 70 (Hsp70) and Heat Shock Protein 90 (Hsp90), directly interact with newly synthesized peptides to assist with proper folding and to prevent aggregation into potentially cytotoxic assemblies [4]. Co-chaperones also assist with folding by interacting with chaperones to modulate chaperone activity or by linking chaperones to other proteostatic systems [5]. When proteins are irreversibly misfolded or aggregated, they are targeted for degradation via the UPS or ALP, which often occurs in a chaperone-dependent manner [4, 6]. The activity of chaperones and co-chaperones is therefore, critical to multiple cellular pathways due to their central role in maintaining proteostasis. CHIP, or STIP1 Homology and U-box containing Protein 1 (STUB1), is a 34.5 kDa co-chaperone encoded by the STUB1 gene. STUB1 is located on chromosome 16 in humans, contains 7 exons, and has 2 alternative splicing transcript variants. STUB1 is highly conserved across species and is expressed in most tissues [7]. CHIP contains an N-terminal tetratricopeptide (TPR) domain and a C-terminal U-box domain. The TPR domain interacts with the chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90 [7], whereas the U-box domain confers E3 ubiquitin ligase activity [7, 8]. The TPR and U-box domains are connected by a central, highly-charged, coiled- coil domain that mediates the homodimerization of CHIP [9, 10]. CHIP homodimers exhibit conformational flexibility, allowing for both symmetrical and asymmetrical dimeric conformations [11-13], with the asymmetric conformation being necessary for the catalytic activity of the U-box domain [12, 9]. The flexible conformation of CHIP homodimers also allows interaction with a diverse range of substrates [11]. Through these domains, CHIP has a range of functions it can exert through chaperone protein networks and, by extension, various cell systems. Ubiquitin is a small protein that can be covalently linked to proteins to facilitate a number of diverse functions [14-17]. Substrates can be mono- or poly-ubiquitinated, and the location of attachment between conjoined ubiquitin molecules ultimately determines the type of chain as well as the ultimate fate of the substrate [14, 18]. CHIP regulates the ubiquitination of chaperone-bound proteins by directly engaging chaperones via its TPR domain. This interaction results in the formation of a dynamic complex that promotes conformational changes in the CHIP protein, allowing it to interact with and ubiquitinate chaperone-bound proteins. Specifically, the U-box domain mediates monoubiquitination or polyubiquitination of chaperone-bound targets or even chaperones themselves [19]. In addition to ubiquitinating chaperone-bound targets, CHIP can also ubiquitinate itself, in a process referred to as auto-ubiquitination [20], which may represent an important capacity of the protein to self-regulate. Polyubiquitination requires cooperation between CHIP and E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. The E2 enzymes that co-ordinate with CHIP have an important role in determining whether CHIP will ubiquitinate itself or other targets [20, 21] and the type of ubiquitin chain formed [22]. CHIP can catalyze lysine-27 (Lys-27), Lys-48, and Lys-63 linked polyubiquitin chains [9, 23-26]. Lys-48 polyubiquitin chains are canonically associated with targeting proteins to the UPS for proteasomal degradation [14, 15, 27], although non-proteolytic functions of these chains have also been reported [17]. Lys-63 chains are largely associated with non-proteolytic functions, including DNA damage response, kinase activation, endocytosis, signal transduction, and selective autophagy, but targeting for proteasomal degradation has also been reported [17, 28]. Lys-27 chains have been associated with mitochondrial damage response, signal transduction, and proteasomal degradation [14, 23, 29, 30]. As CHIP can catalyze the formation of different types of polyubiquitin chains, CHIP-mediated ubiquitination of substrates can serve both proteolytic and non-proteolytic functions [23]. In addition to its function in the UPS, CHIP has an important regulatory role in autophagy. CHIP has been demonstrated to promote the degradation of the inactive phosphorylated form of transcription factor EB (TFEB), a pro-autophagy transcription factor [31, 32], increasing TFEB activity and autophagy [33]. CHIP-deficient cells exhibit impaired chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) [34]. Specifically, autophagosome accumulation and a lack of autophagosome-lysosome fusion have been observed in these cells. CHIP has been shown to direct the degradation of some proteins that contain a KFERQ-like motif through interactions with the chaperone Hsp70 protein 8 (HSPA8) [34]. These interactions are necessary to degrade proteins in the lysosome because they are required to target substrates to the lysosomal receptor, lysosomal-associated membrane protein 2A (LAMP2A) [34]. Since Lys-63 linked polyubiquitin chains can target substrates for lysosomal degradation via the ALP pathway [17, 35], CHIP-mediated ubiquitination may also be targeting substrates for lysosomal degradation. Indeed, CHIP has been shown to target Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF1) for lysosomal degradation via the ALP pathway through the addition of Lys-63 linked ubiquitin chains [36]. CHIP has also been demonstrated to localize to mitochondria within primary neurons following stress, and has been proposed to enhance stress-induced mitochondrial autophagy (mitophagy) [37]. In CHIP knockout mice, expression of genes involved in the initiation of autophagy and mitophagy were found to be decreased in cardiac muscle following treatment with fenofibrate (a PPARα agonist which stimulates oxidative metabolism), but not in wild-type controls [38], while voluntary exercise increased cardiac autophagy in CHIP null mice compared to controls [39], indicating that CHIP may influence autophagy differently in response to different stressors. With its connections to chaperones, the UPS, and the ALP, CHIP is well positioned to triage misfolded or aggregated proteins for refolding or degradation [40]. The autophagic activity has been found to decline in aging animal models [41-43], and age-related changes in CHIP protein levels have also been observed in vivo. CHIP protein levels, but not mRNA levels, were found to decrease in the brains of male wild-type C57BL mice with age [44]. CHIP knockout mice also exhibit accelerated aging [45] and senescence-accelerated mouse models have decreased CHIP mRNA and protein levels compared to senescence-resistant controls [46, 47]. These findings suggest anti-aging functions for CHIP and are consistent with a role in regulating autophagic pathways. CHIP has additional functions that appear to be independent of ubiquitination and its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. For example, CHIP has been found to function as an autonomous chaperone that promotes conformational changes of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), resulting in increased AMPK protein stability and kinase activity [48]. CHIP was also shown to promote the trimerization, activation, and nuclear localization of heat shock factor-1 (HSF1) [49-51], a transcription factor that promotes the transcription of various heat shock proteins in response to misfolded protein accumulation. Whether these functions of CHIP are related to neurodegeneration, remain to be elucidated. Regardless, they demonstrate that the CHIP function is not restricted to its E3 ligase activity. Post-translational modifications of CHIP have been demonstrated to impact its function (Fig. ). Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 5 (CDK5) was found to phosphorylate murine CHIP at serine 20, which is located N-terminal to the TPR domain. Phosphorylation at this site reduced turnover of truncated Apoptosis-Inducing Factor (tAIF) by CHIP and the UPS via a mechanism that involved an alteration of CHIP’s binding affinity to the protein without affecting its E3 ligase activity. In contrast, aurora kinase A (AURKA) phosphorylates CHIP at serine 273 and appears to regulate its E3 ligase activity, promoting the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of androgen receptor (AR) [52]. The Auto-ubiquitination of CHIP has been shown to assist with translocation to the proteasome. This did not cause the degradation of CHIP but helped to facilitate the degradation of the substrate bound to it [53]. CHIP can also monoubiquitinate itself with the help of Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 W (UBE2W) following cellular stress, promoting its interaction with and ubiquitination of ataxin-3 [54]. The full breadth and functional significance of these and other potentially undescribed post-translational modifications (PTMs) of CHIP remain to be elucidated as they could be important regulators of CHIP activity and substrate preference. CHIP is expressed in many different tissues, but it is most highly expressed in the brain, skeletal muscle, and cardiac muscle, suggesting its importance in systems with high metabolic activity [40, 55]. While CHIP is widely expressed throughout the brain, there is a particular abundance within the Purkinje layer of the cerebellum [55]. Stub1 knockout mice show partial lethality during the perinatal development stage [45]. Knockout mice were significantly smaller than wild-type mice and showed an accelerated aging phenotype that resulted in a significantly decreased lifespan [45]. Stub1 knockout mice also displayed severe ataxia, cognitive impairment, hypogonadism, and severe impairments in mitochondrial stress response [55, 56]. Brain lysates from Stub1 knockout mice showed a significant increase in misfolded proteins compared to age-matched or older wild-type controls [45]. Examination of the cerebella of these animals demonstrated a specific and drastic loss of Purkinje cells with increased pyknotic nuclei and severe dendritic swelling [57]. This evidence indicates that aberrations in CHIP can cause significant impairments in multiple physiological processes, including development and neurodegeneration. In this review, we discuss evidence of the involvement of CHIP within various neurodegenerative diseases, each associated with abnormal aggregation of endogenous macromolecules. Given that CHIP is an E3 ligase that promotes the elimination of mutated, misfolded, or aggregated proteins via the UPS and ALP, we hypothesize that CHIP may be involved in each of these neurodegenerative diseases as a common downstream effector, facilitating the removal of a variety of disease-associated proteins. Consequently, CHIP modulation may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of multiple neurodegenerative diseases.

CHIP AND ITS MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS RELEVANT TO NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES

Parkinson’s Disease (PD)

PD is the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder and is associated with the classical ‘parkinsonian’ motor features (bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) as well as multiple non-motor features, including cognitive impairment. PD is characterized by prominent neuronal loss in multiple brain regions, primarily the dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc). Within degenerating areas of the brain, there is a presence of intraneuronal inclusions, called Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, which are primarily composed of aggregated α-synuclein (α-syn) protein [5]. The normal turnover of α-syn utilizes UPS and CMA-mediated degradation [58]. Aggregation of α-syn, due to excessive and/or misfolded proteins, typically follows a process in which misfolding is followed by dimerization, oligomerization, protofibril formation, fibrilization and finally, tightly packed Lewy body formation [59]. Aggregated α-syn has been shown to bind to and inhibit the action of the proteasome, an early-onset event which contributes to neurodegeneration [5, 60]. As a consequence, the ALP is the predominant pathway that cells utilize to degrade α-syn aggregates [58]. Experiments performed in cell culture indicate that CHIP, Hsp70, and α-syn form a complex [8, 61], and examination of post-mortem PD brain tissue demonstrates that they also co-localize within Lewy bodies [8]. Several lines of evidence suggest that Hsp70 can inhibit α-syn aggregation and thereby prevent the neuronal loss, including findings in cell culture models, transgenic Drosophila melanogaster, and mouse models [8, 59, 62]. Overexpression of CHIP has been shown to increase the rate of α-syn clearance from cells [8, 61] and reduce α-syn aggregation in rat brains in vivo [63]. CHIP appears to preferentially target specific oligomeric confirmations for degradation [64] via both proteasomal and lysosomal mechanisms [8]. Through direct or indirect interactions mediated by Hsp70, CHIP can ubiquitinate α-syn in vitro [8, 61, 64]. The co-chaperone BCL2 Associated Athanogene 5 (BAG5) can interact with CHIP via Hsp70 and inhibit the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity of CHIP. As a result, BAG5 causes a reduction in α-syn ubiquitination and mitigates the ability of CHIP to reduce α-syn oligomers [61]. Taken together, these data suggest that Hsp70 and CHIP may be important regulators of α-syn pathology. In addition to α-syn, endonuclease G (EndoG) has been identified as a substrate of CHIP. EndoG is a mitochondrial localised DNase that initiates apoptosis following its nuclear relocalization [65]. EndoG levels have been found to be elevated and increasingly localized within the nucleus in post- mortem PD SNpc tissue compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, EndoG has been found to be crucial for α-syn mediated dopaminergic degeneration in vitro and in vivo [66]. CHIP has been shown to ubiquitinate and promote proteasomal degradation of EndoG, resulting in reduced EndoG protein levels, protecting against cell death [67]. While most PD cases are sporadic, some forms are inherited, such as those caused by mutations in parkin, PTEN-induced protein kinase 1 (PINK1), or leucine-rich repeat kinase-2 (LRRK2) [68]. Mutations in parkin cause autosomal recessive PD [69]. CHIP plays a role in positively regulating the activity of parkin, an E3 ligase that mediates ubiquitination via a RING finger domain [70]. Parkin is part of the PINK1-parkin mitochondrial clearance pathway which acts to remove damaged mitochondria from cells in a selective manner via mitophagy [69]. Parkin acts to ubiquitinate proteins on the outer-mitochondrial membrane to facilitate the degradation of depolarized mitochondria through the ALP [70]. In Drosophila, knockout of Parkin leads to loss of dopaminergic neurons, abnormal wing posture, thoracic indentation, muscle degeneration, and locomotor deficits. Parkin-null Drosophila also exhibit mitochondrial abnormalities including excessive fusion, reduced ATP production, and disorganized crista. Overexpression of CHIP in Parkin-null Drosophila suppressed dopaminergic neuron loss, as well as locomotor and mitochondrial defects. Knockout of CHIP in Parkin-null Drosophila exacerbated Parkin-mediated defects and resulted in a significantly reduced Drosophila lifespan [71]. Together, these findings suggest that CHIP has a critical protective role in the context of parkin dysfunction. Parkin interacts with probable G-protein coupled receptor 37 (Pael-R), a transmembrane protein that can accumulate inside cells and can promote SNpc cell death, independent of Lewy body pathology [72]. Through this interaction, parkin ubiquitinates Pael-R, promoting its proteasomal degradation [72]. Overexpression of parkin reduced both Pael-R protein levels and aggregate formation [72], whereas parkin inactivation enhanced ER stress and dopamine toxicity-mediated dopaminergic neuron death in the SNpc [73]. CHIP has been shown to outperform Hsp70 for binding to parkin in vitro, potentiating the E3 ligase activity of parkin and promoting parkin-mediated ubiquitination of Pael-R, further supporting a role for CHIP in enhancing the protective effects of parkin [72]. Similar to parkin mutations, PINK1 mutations also cause autosomal recessive PD [74-77]. PINK1 is a serine-threonine protein kinase that, together with Parkin, is known to be highly involved in regulating mitophagy [78]. In Drosophila, knockout of Pink1, similar to knockout of Parkin, leads to loss of dopaminergic neurons, abnormal wing posture, thoracic indentation, locomotor deficits, muscle degeneration, and mitochondrial defects. These mitochondrial defects include excessive fusion, reduced ATP content, and crista disorganisation. Overexpression of CHIP in Pink1-null Drosophila suppressed movement and mitochondrial dysfunctions. Unlike in Parkin-null Drosophila, knockout of CHIP in Pink1-null Drosophila did not exacerbate the phenotype, indicating that CHIP may act downstream of PINK1 [71]. CHIP-null Drosophila exhibit impairments in climbing ability as well as reduced thoracic ATP, reduced thoracic mitochondrial DNA, and abnormal mitochondrial morphology [71]. Importantly, CHIP interacts with PINK1, promoting its polyubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation. Changes in CHIP protein levels are inversely correlated with PINK1 protein levels [79]. CHIP-mediated PINK1 degradation increased cytotoxicity in dopaminergic neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells following treatment with staurosporine, an apoptosis inducer [79]. Consistent with this finding, CHIP knockout mice have significantly increased levels of PINK1 protein in whole brain lysates [56]. Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are the most common cause of autosomal dominant PD [80]. LRRK2 is a large multidomain protein believed to play several roles, including maintenance of neuronal polarity [81, 82]. LRRK2 contains a serine/threonine kinase domain and several PD-causing mutations enhance its kinase activity [72]. CHIP has been shown to interact with LRRK2 in vitro in a manner requiring the TPR domain of CHIP, suggesting that Hsp70 or Hsp90 may mediate this binding [82], as well as weakly binding to the charged coiled-coil domain of CHIP [83]. The ubiquitination of wild-type and mutant forms of LRRK2 by CHIP has been shown to cause proteasomal degradation of LRRK2 [81-83]. Furthermore, levels of CHIP and Hsp90 were found to regulate LRRK2-related cytotoxicity [81]. Taken together, work to date demonstrates a beneficial role of CHIP in modulating the molecular pathogenesis of PD, which may occur, in part, through its interactions with α-syn, EndoG, parkin, PINK1, and LRRK2 (Fig. ).

Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)

AD is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease and is characterized by progressive cognitive decline, primarily affecting memory, which eventually leads to impairment of a person’s ability to function in daily life and the emergence of behavioural symptoms. All forms of AD appear to share two molecular pathological hallmarks: the presence of intra-neuronal neurofibrillary tangles composed of tau and the deposition of extra-neuronal amyloid β (Aβ) plaques [84]. CHIP protein levels have been shown to be increased in AD patients [85]. Tau stabilizes microtubules, a critical component of the cytoskeleton, and is enriched in neuronal axons. Due to this important structural function, impairment in tau can be highly deleterious and hence its tight regulation is critical for proper neuronal function [86]. Hyper-phosphorylation of tau can cause its detachment from the axonal microtubules and induce aggregation [86]. In AD patient samples, CHIP levels were found to be inversely proportional to sarkosyl-insoluble tau accumulation, and CHIP knockout mice were found to have increased levels of insoluble tau accumulation [85] and soluble phosphorylated tau [87], indicating that CHIP may protect against neurofibrillary tangle formation in AD. Indeed, overexpressing chaperones, such as Hsp70 or Hsp90, has also been shown to reduce tau aggregation [88], and CHIP levels in brains of both AD patients and healthy controls have been found to be highly correlated with Hsp90 protein levels [85]. CHIP co-immunoprecipitated with tau and Hsp70, and CHIP has been shown to ubiquitinate tau to target it to the proteasome for degradation [26]. Hsp90 and CHIP have also been shown to work in concert to refold or degrade aberrant tau [89]. Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) is a deacetylase of Hsp90, which reduced Hsp90-mediated refolding activity, promoting degradation of Hsp90 substrate proteins [90, 91]. Overexpression of HDAC6 has been shown to promote tau accumulation in HeLa cells. Conversely, decreased HDAC6 increased Hsp90-mediated clearance of tau in primary mouse neurons [92]. CHIP has been shown to bind, ubiquitinate, and regulate the expression of HDAC6 [92]. Brain homogenates from CHIP knockout mice exhibited both increased tau accumulation and levels of HDAC6 92]. Thus, HDAC appears to be involved in the interplay between Hsp90 and CHIP in regulating tau accumulation. Tau phosphorylation by microtubule affinity regulating kinase 2 (MARK2) prevents its recognition by CHIP or Hsp90 [93]. Protein Kinase B (Akt), which can be degraded by Hsp90, has been shown to enhance the activity of MARK2 [89]. Akt knockout mice have decreased levels of CHIP, indicating that CHIP expression may be tied to Akt levels [93]. Interestingly, a reduction in Akt levels still enhanced CHIP-mediated degradation of tau, due to Akt having a higher binding affinity for tau than CHIP [93]. The understanding of CHIP’s regulation of tau requires further investigation and presents an interesting avenue to explore how co-chaperones regulate this protein. Aβ is formed from its precursor protein, amyloid precursor protein (APP), which is a transmembrane protein enriched at neuronal synapses [94, 95]. Functional roles for APP include signalling, gene transduction, neurite growth, and synaptogenesis [96]. APP has multiple cleavage sites, including sites recognized by α-, β-, and γ-secretases. Cleavage of APP by β-secretase 1 (BACE1) leads to the production of the pathogenic 42 amino acid form of Aβ (Aβ42), an insoluble product that can aggregate to form Aβ plaques [96]. Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that CHIP can reduce Aβ aggregation either by regulating levels of APP or BACE1. Evidence for the effects of CHIP on APP includes a demonstration that CHIP co-immunoprecipitated with APP from human brain lysates, indicating a possible in vivo interaction [97, 98]. This interaction was shown to either be direct or in a complex with Hsp70 [97]. The ubiquitination of APP by CHIP was shown to target it to the proteasome for degradation [97]. Depletion of CHIP or Hsp70 was associated with an increase in cellular APP levels [97], whereas overexpression of CHIP in an inducible Aβ-producing cell line was found to decrease Aβ accumulation. When primary cortical neurons were challenged with Aβ accumulation, CHIP overexpression increased their survival, supporting a role for CHIP in mitigating Aβ-mediated cytotoxicity [97]. Regulation of BACE1 by CHIP is suggested by the finding of increased expression of BACE1 under CHIP knockdown conditions [98] and potentially indicated by the reduced expression of CHIP in neurons in human AD brains [99]. CHIP knockdown and overexpression have been shown to be associated with increased and decreased BACE1 expression, respectively [98]. Deletion constructs of CHIP lacking either the TPR or U-box domain did not affect BACE1 expression [98], indicating that full-length CHIP protein is required for regulation of BACE1 levels. Similarly, CHIP can ubiquitinate BACE1 but requires both the TPR and U-box domain for this action [98]. Furthermore, CHIP is capable of stabilizing p53, a transcription factor that negatively regulates BACE1, in an active conformation and thereby reduces BACE1 expression [98]. Overall, these findings indicate that CHIP plays a protective role in modulating AD through its interactions with tau, HDAC6, APP, BACE1, and Akt (Fig. ).

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

ALS is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that causes muscle weakness, disability, and, ultimately death due to selective loss of motor neurons. Pathological protein inclusions, frequently containing TAP DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43), are found in upper and lower motor neurons as well as glial cells [100]. Patients typically present with a combination of upper and lower motor neuron signs and symptoms, which progress to life-threatening respiratory failure and dysphagia [100]. The median survival from the time of diagnosis is 3 to 5 years [101]. While most cases of ALS are sporadic with no identified cause, approximately 5 to 10 percent of cases are familial with an underlying genetic cause, including mutations in genes such as TDP-43, C9orf72, NIMA-related kinase 1(NEK1), Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), and ubiquilin-2 (UBQLN2). At the time of writing this review, there were no reports of an association between CHIP and these ALS-associated genes. However, an interaction between CHIP and superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) has been identified. Mutations in SOD1 account for up to 2 percent of ALS cases [102, 103]. SOD1 is a Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase which prevents damage caused by free radical oxygen molecules. Hsp70 has been shown to interact with SOD1 and to favour interaction with mutant forms over wild-type SOD1 [104]. CHIP expression reduced SOD1 levels, and this effect was attenuated by a proteasome inhibitor, suggesting that CHIP may be mediating proteasomal degradation of SOD1 [104]. Indeed, CHIP has been shown to interact with mutant SOD1 indirectly through Hsp70, which promoted UPS-mediated degradation of mutant SOD1 [104]. Aggregated mutant SOD1 may impair the normal function of the proteasome [104, 105]. In this scenario, SOD1 aggregates can be cleared by Heat Shock Protein beta-8 (HSPB8), a chaperone molecule that can be induced in response to proteasomal inhibition, resulting in reduced size and number of aggregates [105]. HSPB8, together with the co-chaperone BCL2 Associated Athanogene 3 (BAG3), was reported to induce the creation of an autophagosome around the SOD1 aggregate, promoting ALP- mediated degradation [105]. When HSPB8-linked autophagosomes were co-immunoprecipitated, Hsp70, BAG3, and CHIP were present within the protein complex [106]. A CHIP-Hsp70-BAG3-HSPB8 complex has been shown to recruit p62, an autophagy scaffolding protein, promoting autophagosome development around misfolded proteins (Fig. ), highlighting a possible role for CHIP in assisting in the clearance of SOD1 aggregates via both proteasomal and lysosomal mechanisms [106]. CHIP’s ability to degrade mutant SOD1 via two independent mechanisms suggests it could have a beneficial role in SOD1-mutant forms of ALS and has led to the investigation of CHIP as a potential ALS therapeutic. Dorfin is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that degrades mutant SOD1 and reduces mutant SOD1-mediated toxicity [107]. Because of its ability to degrade mutant SOD1, Dorfin has been of interest as a potential ALS therapeutic, but in vivo investigations have only shown modest benefit, and Dorfin has been found to have an extremely short half-life. To increase the efficacy of Dorfin as a therapeutic, engineered chimeric proteins have been generated, combining the substrate-binding domain of Dorfin and the U-box domain of CHIP [108]. This chimeric protein has been shown to have an increased half-life, to increase ubiquitination of mutant SOD1, to reduce aggregate formation, and to rescue neurons from mutant SOD1 toxicity. However, in vivo results have yet to be reported and will be required to support further development of this potential therapeutic approach. Necroptosis is a pro-inflammatory form of programmed cell death which has been implicated in neuroinflammation and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, most notably ALS, but also AD and PD [109-111]. Elevated levels of key necroptosis mediator proteins, receptor-interacting protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3), have been observed in ALS mouse models and patient samples [110, 111], raising the possibility of inhibition of these proteins as a potential treatment strategy for ALS. CHIP ubiquitinates and decreases levels of both RIPK1 and RIPK3 in vitro and in vivo, reducing necroptosis in response to various stressors [112, 113]. These findings indicate that CHIP could also provide therapeutic benefit for ALS treatment, and potentially other neurodegenerative diseases, through its ability to decrease RIPK1 and RIPK3 protein levels and reduce necroptosis.

Lafora Disease (LD)

LD is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder, leading to defects in the development of cerebral cortical neurons and is most commonly associated with epileptic seizures [114, 115]. LD is caused by loss of function mutations in the genes encoding laforin, a phosphatase, and malin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is responsible for regulating laforin protein levels [116]. LD is characterized by the presence of Lafora bodies, which are cytoplasmic polyglucosan aggregates, not protein aggregates. Lafora bodies exist within both neuronal and non-neuronal tissues. Laforin and malin are both critical proteins involved in glycogen production whose loss of function results in hyperphosphorylated, insoluble glycogen [117, 118]. Overexpression of mutant or wild-type malin can lead to polyglucosan aggregation, proteasomal dysfunction, and cell death. CHIP does not associate with mutant or aggregated malin, but does interact with wild-type malin through Hsp70 and increases malin protein levels in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. ) [119]. The mechanism by which CHIP increases malin protein levels is currently unknown is independent of the U-box domain and thus could be due to the stabilisation of malin [119]. It is also unknown whether CHIP promotes malin aggregation or cellular dysfunction. While, the role of CHIP in LD is not well understood, current findings suggest CHIP could potentiate LD.

Huntington Disease (HD) and other Polyglutamine (PolyQ) Diseases

Polyglutamine (polyQ) diseases are inherited neurodegenerative disorders caused by the expansion of cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) in disease-causing genes. Currently, there are nine clinically described polyQ diseases: HD, spinal-bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), spinocerebellar ataxia 1 (SCA1), SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, SCA17, and dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA). Protein aggregation is present in all of these diseases, and none have therapies for prevention or cure [120, 121]. HD is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the progressive movement, behavioural, and psychiatric symptoms. HD is caused by polyQ expansion in the gene encoding the huntingtin protein (HTT) [122]. CHIP has been shown to reduce polyQ-HTT protein aggregation and toxicity [123, 124], but did not promote the degradation of wild- type HTT [125]. Knockdown of CHIP in mice overexpressing neuronal polyQ-HTT resulted in reduced lifespan, accelerated neuronal dysfunction, behavioural abnormalities, and increased cerebellar granular cell HTT inclusions [123]. It has also been shown that high levels of Hsp70 binding protein 1 (HSPBP1) expression in neurons inhibits CHIP activity, reducing CHIP-mediated elimination of neuronal polyQ-HTT, while HSPBP1 knockdown has been shown to increase CHIP activity (Fig. ). Using an AAV CRISPR/Cas9 to target and knockdown HSPBP1 in a HD mouse model prevented accumulation and aggregation of HTT protein, and decreased loss of striatal presynaptic neurons [124]. SBMA is an X-linked genetic neurodegenerative disease caused by polyQ expansion within the gene encoding AR. SMBA is only present in males and is characterized by muscle weakness and progressive muscular atrophy [126]. CHIP has been shown to preferentially target polyQ-AR mutant proteins for proteasomal degradation compared to wild-type AR (Fig. ) [127]. Overexpression of CHIP in neuronal cells reduced mutant AR monomers, and overexpression in a SBMA mouse model improved movement defects and reduced polyQ-AR nuclear accumulation [127]. PolyQ expansion of the protein ataxin-3, a deubiquitinating enzyme (DUB), causes SCA3, also known as Machado-Joseph disease [128]. SCA3 is an autosomal dominant form of inherited cerebellar ataxia (see below). CHIP has been shown to preferentially bind and degrade mutant or polyQ-ataxin-3, but not wild-type ataxin-3, in neuronal cell lines. CHIP-mediated protection was improved by Hsc70 overexpression [123]. Using SCA3 transgenic mouse models, knockout and/or knockdown of CHIP was shown to worsen SCA3 motor defects, increase neuronal ataxin-3 microaggregation, and result in early death in a concentration-dependent manner [129]. PolyQ-ataxin-3 interacts with both monoubiquitinated and non-ubiquitinated CHIP, but the monoubiquitylation of CHIP by UBE2W has been shown to stabilize CHIP’s interaction with ataxin-3 and to enhance ataxin-3 ubiquitination (Fig. ) [53]. It was also shown that ataxin-3, as a DUB, can cleave monoubiquitin from CHIP, reducing its ubiquitylation activity. SCA3 transgenic mice have significantly decreased CHIP levels, while ataxin-3 knockout mice have no difference in CHIP levels compared to wild-type mice [53]. These results suggest a complex interplay between CHIP and polyQ-ataxin-3. PolyQ expansion of ataxin-1 causes SCA1, another autosomal dominant form of inherited cerebellar ataxia [130]. CHIP associates with both wild-type and polyQ-ataxin-1 in a TPR domain-dependent manner [131]. Overexpression of CHIP in SCA1 mutant Drosophila results in decreased wild- type and polyQ-ataxin-1 protein levels (Fig. ) and significantly suppresses polyQ-ataxin-1 mediated toxicity within Drosophila eyes [132]. CHIP overexpression has also been shown to reduce wild-type ataxin-1 solubility, increasing aggregate formation [131]. CHIP has been shown to associate with and promote degradation of polyQ expanded but not wild-type forms of HTT, AR, ataxin-3, and CHIP is also able to promote degradation of polyQ expanded repeat short peptides [123, 133]. These results indicate that CHIP can specifically recognize polyQ expansions and warrants investigation into the role of CHIP in other polyQ diseases, including other SCAs (SCA 2, 6, 7, and 17) and DRPLA. CHIP appears to have a more complicated role in polyQ-ataxin-1 SCA1, as it may promote ataxin-1 aggregation, but has been shown to have a promising protective role in mouse models of HD, SBMA, and SCA3.

CHIP MUTATIONS IMPLICATED IN NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE

Inherited Cerebellar Ataxias

Inherited cerebellar ataxias are neurodegenerative diseases characterized by a progressive loss of cerebellar Purkinje neurons. Cerebellar neurodegeneration leads to a variety of symptoms, including decreased voluntary muscle control and incoordination, as well as clinical signs and symptoms that often reflect the anatomic site of damage. For example, damage to midline structures of the cerebellum often results in the development of gait ataxia, imbalance, truncal ataxia (inability to sit unsupported by their arms), vertigo, and nystagmus (rhythmic oscillations of the eyes). In contrast, damage to the cerebellar hemispheres is usually associated with limb ataxia, intention tremor (a tremor that increases in severity as the hand moves near its target), and ataxic dysarthria (difficulty articulating speech with a scanning quality) [134]. Increasingly, cerebellar lesions have also been suggested to have effects on cognitive and emotional processing [135]. Inherited cerebellar ataxias are phenotypically heterogenous and can demonstrate various modes of inheritance: autosomal dominant (such as the SCAs described above), autosomal recessive, X-linked, or even mitochondrial [136]. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias are estimated to have a prevalence of around 1-5 per 100,000 people and autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxias have a prevalence of around 3 per 100,000 people [137]. A subset of autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia includes Gordon Holmes syndrome (GHS), a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by progressive cerebellar ataxia and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Genetic testing of cerebellar ataxia patients of unknown cause has identified 132 patients with disease-associated STUB1 mutations. To date, 69 different disease-associated STUB1 mutations have been identified and confirmed. Of the identified disease-associated STUB1 mutations, 6 mutations map to intronic sequences, 21 mutations affect the TPR domain, 18 affect the coiled-coil domain, 23 map to the U-box domain, and 1 maps to the 3’ UTR (Fig. ). Thirty- eight of the identified mutations are associated with an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern of the disease, while 35 are associated with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. Our current understanding of autosomal recessive STUB1-associated disease and autosomal dominant STUB1-associated disease from these cases is described below.

Autosomal Recessive STUB1-associated Disease

Autosomal recessive spinocerebellar ataxia 16 (SCAR16) is a type of cerebellar ataxia caused by autosomal recessive mutations in the STUB1 gene. To date, 42 patients with autosomal recessive forms of STUB1-associated disease have been identified from 23 kindreds, 38 of which were diagnosed with cerebellar ataxia (20 male, 17 female, and 1 unspecified case) [55, 57, 138-150]. Four additional STUB1 patients were identified from a screen of patients with nervous system abnormalities [151]. In more than half of the cases, multiple siblings were affected. Out of all 42 patients identified, no generational family disease history was reported, as is typically observed in autosomal recessive conditions. Patients were ethnically diverse; of those kindreds for which ethnicity was specified, four families were of Chinese descent, two were Taiwanese, ten were European, three were Middle Eastern, and one was Sri Lankan. The age of onset for ataxia ranged from infancy to 57 years, with a mean of 22.3 years. All patients exhibited motor dysfunction and, for those who had neuroimaging, all demonstrated cerebellar atrophy Table (); however, there was large variation in the reported clinical phenotypes. For example, patients exhibited large differences in cognitive status ranging from no impairment to severe impairment/dementia. Additional neurological findings included epilepsy, eye movement abnormalities, chorea, dysarthria, urinary incontinence, and pyramidal symptoms, amongst others. Nerve conduction studies were abnormal in 3 out of 12 patients tested, hyperreflexia was observed in 15 of out 24 patients, and cognitive impairment was observed within 24 out of 35 patients. In addition, impaired sexual development/endocrine function was found in 5 out of 27 patients Table (). The diversity of symptoms exhibited by SCAR16 patients suggest involvement of multiple brain regions Table (). Indeed, one SCAR16 patient (Patient #25, Table ) was shown, with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), to have degeneration throughout the brain, not solely limited to the cerebellum [144]. Additionally, neuropathological analysis of another SCAR16 patient (Patient #21, Table ) displayed abnormalities that were not restricted to the cerebellum. Within this patient, dramatic cerebellar cortical, Purkinje, and granular cell loss with reactive Bergmann gliosis was observed. Within the frontal cortex, swollen axonal processed we observed, and CHIP staining within neurons was reported to be diffuse and cytoplasmic with intense nuclear staining in neurons within deep layers of the frontal cortex. Ubiquitin and p62 positive neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NII) were also observed within frontal cortex neurons [142]. Twenty-two of the patients with autosomal recessive forms of STUB1-associated disease carried homozygous mutations and 20 carried compound heterozygous mutations (Fig. ). Patients with compound heterozygous mutations had either two different missense mutations or one missense and one nonsense or frameshift mutation. In total, 37 different autosomal recessive associated STUB1 mutations have been identified, 4 map to an intronic region, 9 affect the TPR domain, 10 affect the coiled coil domain, 13 affect the U-box domain, and 1 was found within the 3’ UTR region. In silico prediction tools have mostly supported the STUB1 variants associated with autosomal recessive disease to date as being pathogenic (Fig. ). MutationTaster [152] predicted all identified mutations as disease-causing while SIFT [153] and PolyPhen2 [154] predicted that all but 10 and 2 of the reported mutations would be disease causing, respectively. Most SCAR16 patients tested have been reported to have reduced levels of steady-state CHIP protein [139, 147, 155]. Multiple in vitro studies have been conducted to examine 13 different autosomal recessive associated mutations: E28K, N65S, A79T, A79D, L123V, N130I, K145Q, W147C, L165F, M211I, S236T, M240T, and T246M. Multiple mutants were shown to have reduced cellular expression following transfection [156]. These mutations have also been shown to reduce CHIP’s ability to interact with Hsc70 to varying degrees in vitro, with TPR domain mutants showing the most significant defects [156]. U-box mutations have been found to have increased binding capacity, but not affinity, for Hsp70 [157]. All tested mutations, other than N65S, showed decreased thermal stability and increased propensity for oligomerization [155, 156, 158]. U-box mutations were significantly more likely to form dimers than TPR or coiled- coil mutants, which had a higher propensity to form higher order oligomers [155, 156, 158]. In addition, U-box mutants, as well as the N65S TPR mutation, were all shown to retain their ability to recruit E2s but lacked E3 ligase activity [156], while other TPR and coiled-coil mutants retained E3 ligase activity [157]. CHIP mutants that had more E3 ligase activity and normal tertiary structure were associated with worsened disease outcomes than CHIP mutations lacking E3 ligase activity, indicating that the inhibition of mutant CHIP activity may be beneficial to STUB1-associated disease patients [157]. Interestingly, an earlier report demonstrated that within SCAR16 patients, U-box domain mutations were associated with a higher incidence of cognitive impairment than TPR or coiled-coil domain mutations [157]. Since that report, additional SCAR16 cases have been published and the higher incidence of cognitive impairment with U-box domain mutations is still observed: 62.5% (10/16) of TPR mutated alleles, 59% (13/22) of coiled-coiled mutated alleles, and 92% (22/24) of U-box mutant alleles (P = 0.024, Fisher’s exact test). To date, the most intensively studied CHIP mutation associated with SCAR16 is T246M. This missense mutation occurs in CHIP’s U-box domain and has been identified in two homozygous patients with GHS [57]. T246M-CHIP has been shown in vitro to possess no E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and to have an increased propensity for oligomerization, but it maintains normal chaperone interaction. Rats and mice expressing homozygous T246M-CHIP exhibited Purkinje cell degeneration, decreased survival, cognitive defects, gonadal atrophy, and reduced body weight and brain mass [155]. Mutant mice also exhibited age-dependent progressive motor dysfunction. In contrast, Stub1 null mice display severe motor impairment at the time of weaning with little progression over time. Thus, the progression observed with T246M-CHIP mice more accurately models symptoms observed in STUB1-associated disease patients and also allows for the study of earlier or pre-clinical symptoms. Tissue lysates from the T246M-CHIP mouse cerebellum, whole brain, and testes, as well as embryonic fibroblasts, all displayed decreased CHIP protein levels compared to controls. Interestingly, proteomics analysis of T246M-CHIP rat cerebella and whole brain, compared to controls, showed increased levels of tau and decreased levels of both α-syn and PINK1 [155]. While whole-brain lysates from Stub1 null mice also showed increased levels of tau, there was no difference in α-syn protein levels [87] and increased PINK1 levels [56], compared to controls. The differences between CHIP mutant and null animal phenotypes support the observation that STUB1-associated disease is not solely the result of the loss of E3 ligase function. Further study is still required to confirm that all of the STUB1-disease associated mutations are indeed disease-causing and not just variants of unknown significance, but the rodent model recapitulation of STUB1-associated disease symptoms, as well as in vitro studies and in silico predictions, provide convincing evidence that CHIP mutations can cause multisystemic symptoms including neurodegeneration and hypogonadism. The specific molecular pathways affected by CHIP mutations in SCAR16 remain an area open for investigation. SCAR16 patients have been shown to exhibit cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling dysregulation [159]. cAMP is an ATP derivative involved in intracellular signaling [160, 161]. cAMP signaling involves activation of various protein kinases, including protein kinase A (PKA), and can function to regulate ion channels [162, 163]. Dysregulation of cAMP-PKA signaling has been observed in many other neurodegenerative diseases, including PD [164], AD [165], HD [166], and SCA1 [167-169]. CHIP has been shown to attenuate cAMP-PKA signaling through Hsp70-mediated interaction with the catalytic subunit PKAc, leading to its proteasomal degradation [159, 170]. Further research is necessary to determine how mutant CHIP may lead to cAMP-PKA signaling dysregulation observed within SCAR16 patients. Understanding how this pathway could contribute to disease pathogenesis may provide insights into the development of treatments for SCAR16 as well as into the role of CHIP in other neurodegenerative diseases.

Autosomal Dominant STUB1-associated Disease

Spinocerebellar ataxia 48 (SCA48) is an autosomal dominant form of cerebellar ataxia caused by a heterozygous STUB1 mutation. At the time of this review, 90 patients (26 male, 55 female, and 9 unspecified) from 43 kindreds with autosomal dominant STUB-associated mutations have been described in the literature [150, 171-176]. Interestingly, when sex is specified, 67.9% of identified SCA48 patients are female, while a difference in sex-based prevalence of SCAR16 is not apparent. Sex-based differences in disease prevalence, onset, and outcome have been observed in a number of neurodegenerative diseases [177, 178]. It has been reported that cerebellar CHIP protein levels are lower in females than males, which may play a role in the observed sex-based difference in SCA48 prevalence [150]. Out of the 43 reported kindreds, 34 had a positive family history of disease. An absence of family history may be explained by spontaneous mutations, incomplete penetrance, or later onset of disease with some family members with a STUB1 mutation not living long enough to display symptoms. For cases in which ethnicity was indicated, all patients were of European descent. The age of symptom onset among SCA48 patients varied from age 5 to 74 years; the mean age of onset for these patients was 44.6 years, which was older than the average age at onset of SCAR16 patients. Symptom onset typically begins during mid-adulthood and includes cognitive impairment, including cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS), and/or motor disturbances. Patients presenting with primarily cognitive impairment may not display motor features for years after the age of initial disease onset, but most patients eventually develop both cognitive and motor impairments. All but five patients were described as having ataxia. Two non-ataxic patients had no symptoms (Patient #41 & 136, Table ). Two other non-ataxic patients (Patient #36 & 38, Table ) presented with CCAS without motor dysfunction. As mentioned previously, cognitive impairment precedes movement abnormalities for many SCA48 patients, so these patients may go on to develop ataxia. The last non-ataxia patient (Patient #81, Table ) presented with parkinsonism without ataxia. Of the patients reported, 15 out of 22 displayed hyperreflexia, 63 out of 86 presented with cognitive impairment, and 2 out of 11 displayed sexual development disturbances. Additional reported symptoms included but were not limited to anxiety, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, chorea, parkinsonism, dystonia, chorea, and urinary incontinence, among others. One patient had been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (Patient #71, Table ). Among patient who had neuroimaging, all showed significant cerebellar atrophy, including an asymptomatic patient. Some patients also exhibited hypoperfusion to various brain regions including the cerebellum as well as frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes. One patient displayed severe frontal lobe atrophy and some displayed additional cortical atrophy. Additionally, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) revealed bilateral dentate nuclei hyperintensity in 9/10 SCA48 patients [179]. Dentate nuclei hyperintensity by T2WI is not typical of other SCAs [180], and this hyperintensity combined with atrophy of the postero-lateral portions of the cerebellar hemisphere has been termed the “crab sign” [179]. Thirty-two different autosomal dominant mutations were observed in these patients and were reported to segregate with the disease: 12 affected the TPR domain, 8 affected the coiled-coil domain, and 10 mapped to the U-box, and 2 were intronic. Twenty mutations were missense, 3 were nonsense, 8 caused frameshift mutations, and 1 was an in-frame deletion. The most common mutation reported to date is a dominant heterozygous frameshift truncation mutations located within the U-box domain (ENST00000219548: c.823_824delCT, ENSP00000219548: p.L275Dfs*16). This mutation has been identified within 3 unrelated kindreds of 3 different ethnicities. In silico prediction tools for identifying disease causing mutations were preformed using all described autosomal dominant STUB1 mutations (Fig. ). MutationTaster predicted all identified mutations would be disease-causing while SIFT and PolyPhen2 predicted that all but 2 of the reported mutations would be disease causing. To date, no further in vitro or in vivo analysis has been performed to further investigate any of the identified autosomal dominant STUB1 mutations. Neuropathologic examination of 5 SCA48 patients with missense mutations located within the TPR domain exhibited significant loss of cerebellar Purkinje cells with increased astrogliosis and Bergmann gliosis [150, 175]. One patient displayed mild frontal lobe atrophy. Chen et al. found ubiquitinated inclusions within the cerebellum which were negative for p62, TDP-43, and α-syn [175]. Neurofibrillary tangles were present but Braak staging was low and consistent with the age of the patient. No signs of basal ganglia abnormalities were observed in their 4 cases, despite one patient presenting with mild parkinsonism. Roux et al., 2020 reported one SCA48 case with mild neuronal loss within the SNpc [150]. This case demonstrated only infrequent pretangles and neuropil threads with tau immunostaining in the hippocampus, as well as rare p62 nuclear inclusions in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. No inclusions were seen with immunostaining for ubiquitin, TDP-43, α-syn, polyQ, or prion protein (PrP). Confocal microscopy of healthy controls showed CHIP expression to be prominent within Purkinje cells and localised within the cell bodies and proximal dendrites, with little staining in distal dendritic compartments. In contrast, CHIP localised throughout somatodendritic and distal dendritic regions of Purkinje cells in the brains of SCA48 patients. This may suggest that the mislocalisation of CHIP, not the absolute level of CHIP, is relevant to disease pathogenesis. Purkinje cells from SCA3 and SCA5 patients displayed CHIP localisation consistent with healthy controls, while SCA7 patients showed CHIP mislocalisation consistent with SCA48 patients [175], indicating that the CHIP mislocalisation is not solely due to CHIP mutations and may be attributed to other aspects of Purkinje neurodegeneration. Neuropathological examinations of 3 related SCA48 patients with a U-box frameshift mutation displayed an almost complete loss of cerebellar Purkinje cells in all cases and Bergmann gliosis. Braak staging was low and consistent with the age of the patient [176]. Significant neuronal loss was also observed within the mesencephalon, medulla oblongata, and subthalamic nucleus. NIIs positive for ubiquitin and p62 were present within the cerebellum, SNpc, and deep pontine nucleus. p62 positive inclusions were also observed within the hippocampus. CHIP staining within neurons was observed to be diffuse throughout but not different from controls. Within one patient with atypical parkinsonism (Patient #81, Table ), tau pathology was observed within many brain regions, including the temporal cortex, hippocampus, SNpc, locus coeruleus, cerebellar dentate nucleus, and spinal motor neurons. None of the patients displayed α-syn or TDP-43 positive inclusions. Some faint diffuse nuclear polyglutamine immunoreactivity was observed within the cerebellum of the 2 brains tested [176]. How CHIP mutations cause disease and the multitude of complex variable symptoms observed within SCAR16 and SCA48 patients still require further elucidation. Variability between patients, even those carrying the same mutation, indicates that other genetic or environmental factors may play a role in the pathophysiology of the disease. Sex-based differences in the prevalence of SCA48 but not SCAR16 may be due to differences in cerebellar CHIP expression between males and females but could also point to additional mechanisms underlying disease pathology, such as microglia function, which has been implicated in sex-based differences in the prevalence of many neurodegenerative diseases [177, 178]. In vitro and in vivo analysis of multiple SCAR16 mutations have reported that mutations result in decreased CHIP protein expression [139, 147, 155, 156]. However, differences between the T246M mouse model and Stub1 null mice suggest that the effects of CHIP mutations are the result of more than solely loss of function. Additionally, post- mortem brain tissue from SCA48 patients were absent of tau pathology [175], aside from one patient with atypical parkinsonism, while Stub1 knockout mice and C. elegans showed substantial levels of tau pathology [93], indicating that mutant forms of CHIP may still be able to eliminate tau, further suggesting the cause of the disease is more than merely CHIP loss of function. Furthermore, the association between cognitive impairment and U-box domain mutations suggests that there may be different mechanisms contributing to specific STUB1-associated disease symptoms. Interestingly, other causative mutations identified in patients with GHS affect Ring Finger Protein 216 (RNF216), which is an E3 ubiquitin ligase, Patatin Like Phospholipase Domain Containing 6 (PNPLA6), which is a phospholipase [181, 182], and OTU Deubiquitinase 4 (OTUD4), which is a DUB [135], all of which play important roles in proteostasis, like CHIP, and may point to a converging molecular pathway. Additionally, multiple genes associated with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias, including ataxin-1 and ataxin-3, are known interactors of CHIP (described above), which may also point to the converging pathway among autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias.

THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL OF CHIP

As discussed above, CHIP has the potential to promote the degradation of proteins associated with multiple neurodegenerative disorders, including PD, AD, ALS, HD, SBMA, SCA1 and SCA3. Thus, increasing CHIP levels or activity could present a promising treatment strategy for these diseases. To date, a limited number of compounds have been found to increase CHIP protein levels in vitro, which include trehalose, anisomycin, and YL-109. Trehalose, a disaccharide of glucose and known autophagy enhancer, has been implicated as a potential STUB1-associated disease therapeutic requiring further investigation. Treatment of SCAR16 patient fibroblasts with trehalose was shown to increase CHIP and Hsp70 protein levels, increase autophagy [183], and reduce oxidative stress [184]. It has also been shown that anisomycin treatment increases CHIP protein levels and protects cells against OGD-induced necroptosis in in vitro models of cerebellar ischemia [112]. The agent 2-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-benzothiazole (YL-109) has been shown to suppress triple-negative breast cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo [185]. YL-109 was also shown to increase CHIP transcription through aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) recruitment upstream of the STUB1 gene. YL-109 treatment of cells with knockdown of AhR or CHIP rescued proliferation [185]. While evidence to date suggests that increasing CHIP expression or activity could be beneficial for various neurodegenerative diseases, there may be undesirable effects that need to be considered. For instance, as discussed above, CHIP can promote degradation of polyQ-ataxin-1, but it can also promote degradation and decreased solubility of wild-type ataxin-1. Additionally, while CHIP may reduce α-syn aggregation, reduce Pael-R levels, and protect against LRRK2 mutations in PD models, one of the substrates of CHIP may be tyrosine hydroxylase [63], an enzyme critical in the production of dopamine, which could make non-specifically increasing CHIP expression or activity unsuitable as a therapy for PD. For each neurodegenerative disease, taking different approaches to CHIP modulation may be necessary to optimise efficacy and limit side effects. One interesting avenue warranting investigation is the use of protein-protein interaction (PPI) modulators. Certain small molecules have been shown to stabilise specific PPIs [186], including E3 ligase-substrate interactions [187]. PPI modulators, which could stabilise the interaction between CHIP and specific aggregated, overexpressed, or mutated disease-associated proteins, could be employed to enhance the removal of specific proteins without broadly increasing CHIP-mediated protein degradation. Influencing PTMs of CHIP could also provide another interesting therapeutic treatment avenue that may reduce unwanted effects. For instance, increasing CHIP monoubiquitylation via UBE2W increases degradation of polyQ-ataxin-3, and could potentially be useful for SCA3 treatment. To date, PTMs of CHIP are not well understood and warrant further research, as they may provide insight into improving the therapeutic benefit or target specificity of CHIP. High-throughput mutagenesis of E3 ubiquitin ligases has been used to determine activity enhancing mutations, including mutations that enhance U-box domain interaction with specific E2s, allowing for the enhancement of degradation of certain proteins and not others [188]. High-throughput mutagenesis could also be used to identify mutations that could enhance specific interactions between CHIP and disease-associated proteins. The generation of chimeric proteins utilising either the TPR or U-box domain CHIP could present another method for developing the therapeutic potential of CHIP, potentially increasing disease-associated protein degradation while decreasing undesirable interactions. As described above, CHIP is able to promote proteasomal degradation of mutant SOD1 through an indirect interaction mediated by Hsp70 [104]. To improve on the therapeutic potential, a Dorfin-CHIP chimeric protein [108] described above, was generated utilised the E3 activity of the U-box domain of CHIP linked to the substrate-binding domain of Dorfin, which is able to interact directly with mutant SOD1. This Dorfin-CHIP chimeric protein was shown to increase mutant SOD1 degradation. The TPR domain of CHIP is able to interact with many different substrates, including polyQ expanded proteins, and may also be useful for the generation of chimeric protein therapeutics. The utility of a chimeric protein containing either the TPR or U-box domain would likely depend on the specific disease and protein being targeted. For the treatment of STUB1-associated diseases, it is currently unknown how CHIP modulation may impact disease symptoms and progression. Increasing expression of CHIP via trehalose treatment in SCAR16 patient fibroblasts showed benefits in vitro [184], but multiple lines of evidence suggest that STUB1-associated disease may be due to more than just loss of CHIP function. Several SCAR16 mutations have been shown to have increased propensity to form higher-order oligomers in vitro, so increasing CHIP expression may exacerbate disease in these patients. Further investigation is required to determine whether upregulating or downregulating CHIP within STUB1-associated diseases may provide therapeutic benefit for patients. As with other genetic diseases, major therapeutic breakthroughs for STUB1-associated diseases will likely require precision or personalised medicine in which the intervention targets the individual patient’s CHIP defect. And, as with all neurodegenerative disorders, the timing of the intervention during the disease course will be an important consideration.

CONCLUSION

The co-chaperone CHIP plays a major role in proteostasis and hence is emerging as an important regulator of neurodegeneration. Direct evidence for its importance in neurodegenerative disease comes from the identification of disease-associated STUB1 mutations in individuals with both autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant forms of cerebellar ataxia. Multiple lines of evidence also demonstrate that CHIP can reduce protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases characterised as proteinopathies, including PD, AD, HD, SBMA, SCA1, SCA3 and ALS, and could be a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of these diseases. Future research will need to elucidate how CHIP levels, CHIP functions, and CHIP interactions and networks are affected in these diseases. Understanding the interplay between CHIP and other contributors to disease pathogenesis, such as genetic and environmental factors, will be needed to explain how CHIP dysfunction may manifest as different neurodegenerative diseases in different individuals. This will also be important in informing disease-specific treatment strategies. Such insights will assist in deciphering how CHIP can most effectively be modified in vivo to enhance its specific degradation of disease-associated proteins.
Table 1

Summary of all reported individuals with STUB1-associated disease.

Kindred Patient AAO (y)/ Sex Ethnicity Clinical diagnosis STUB1 mutation CHIP mutation Ataxia Cognitive status Eye movement abnormalities Upper motor neuron features Other movement disorders Sexual development Additional clinical features Neuroimaging Nerve conduction studies
A [55]117/FChineseSCAR16c.493C>Tc.493C>TL165FL165FSevere truncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaSevere impairmentOphthalmoplegiaNormal tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
217/FSCAR16c.493C>Tc.493C>TL165FL165FModerate truncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaNormalNystagmusIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophySlowed NCV (motor and sensory)
314/FSCAR16c.493C>Tc.493C>TL165FL165FModerate truncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaModerate impairmentOphthalmoplegiaIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophySlowed NCV (motor and sensory)
419/MSCAR16c.493C>Tc.493C>TL165FL165FModerate truncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaNormalNystagmusIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophySlowed NCV (motor and sensory)
B [55]520/MChineseSCAR16c.389A>Tc.441G>TN130IW147CSubtle/mild truncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaNormalNormalNormal tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophyNot reported
C[55]616/FChineseSCAR16c.621C>Gc.707G>CY207*S236TModerate /severe truncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaNormalNormalIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophyNot reported
D [57]719/FChineseSCAR16c.737C>Tc.737C>TT246MT246MSevere ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNystagmusNormal tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedHypogonadismNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNormal
817/Fc.737C>Tc.737C>TT246MT246MSevere ataxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesTremorHypogonadismNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
E [138]92/MGermanSCAR16c.367C>Gc.367C>GL123VL123VAtaxiaNormalNo abnormalities reportedPyramidal featuresNo abnormalities reportedNormalUICerebellar atrophyNormal
F [138]1016/FTurkishSCAR16c.719T>Cc.719T>CM240TM240TAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedPyramidal featuresNo abnormalities reportedNormalUICerebellar atrophyNormal
G [138]1129/MSaudi ArabianSCAR16c.235G>Ac.236C>AA79TA79DAtaxiaNormalNo abnormalities reportedPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
1249/MSCAR16c.235G>Ac.236C>AA79TA79DAtaxiaNormalNo abnormalities reportedPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalUICerebellar atrophyNot reported
H [139]132/MSaudi ArabianSCAR16c.194A>Gc.194A>GN65SN65SAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, delayed development, dyspraxiaNystagmusNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNormalAged appearance, alopecia, T1DCerebellar hypoplasiaNot reported
140/MSCAR16c.194A>Gc.194A>GN65SN65SAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentChronic iridocyclitis with secondary glaucoma, oculomotor dyspraxia with saccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedTremorNormalDysphagia, aged appearance, ulcerative colitisSevere cerebellar atrophyNot reported
150.67/FSCAR16c.194A>Gc.194A>GN65SN65SAtaxiaCognitive impairment, delayed development, dyspraxiaNystagmusNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNormalEpilepsy (until 2 yrs), aged appearance, facial dysmorphismCerebellar hypoplasiaNot reported
I [139]1633/FSri LankanSCAR16c.82G>Ac.430A>TE28KK144*Gait ataxia, dysarthriaNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedOligomenorrhea, secondary infertilityDysphagiaCerebellar hypoplasiaNot reported
J [140]1723/MBelgianSCAR16c.433A>Cc.687-690delCTACK145QI227PGait/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalDysphagiaCerebellar atrophyNormal
1825/Mc.433A>Cc.687-690delCTACK145QI227PGait/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalDysphagiaCerebellar atrophyNot reported
K [141]1915/MNot reportedSCAR16c.612+1G>Cc.823C>GIntronicL275VTruncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, attention failures, executive dysfunctionNystagmus, fractionated pursuit, hypometric saccadesPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesMyoclonusNormalDysphagiaCerebellar atrophyNormal
L [142]2020/FSpanishSCAR16c.633G>Ac.712G>TM211IE238*Generalized ataxia, dysarthriaSevere impairment/dementiaSaccadic ocular pursuitPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesMyoclonusNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNormal
2122/Mc.633G>Ac.712G>TM211IE238*Generalized ataxia, dysarthriaSevere impairment/dementiaNo abnormalities reportedSpasticity, increased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNormal
M [143]2215/FNot reportedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentOculomotor dysfunctionSpastic equinovarus deformityMyoclonic and tremulous movementNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
2319/MSCAR16c.724G>Ac.724G>AE242KE242KTruncal/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNystagmusNo abnormalities reportedChoreoathetosis, dystonia, myoclonusNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophyNot reported
2424/Mc.724G>Ac.724G>AE242KE242KAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentVertical ocular flutterNo abnormalities reportedDystonia, myoclonic and tremulous movementNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedSevere cerebellar atrophyNot reported
N [144]2512/MGermanSCAR16c.355C>Tc.880A>TR119*I294FAtaxiaSevere impairment/ dementiaNystagmusSpastic tetraparesis, increased tendon reflexes, Babinski signDystoniaHypogonadismGeneralized tonic-clonic seizures, hypomimia, UICerebellar atrophy, atrophy of mesencephalon and parieto-occipital cortexNormal
O [144]2612/MBelgianSCAR16c.433A>Cc.728C>TK145QP243LAtaxiaSevere impairment/ dementia, mutismNo abnormalities reportedSpastic tetraparesis, increased tendon reflexes, Babinski signDystoniaNormalGeneralized tonic-clonic seizures, UICerebellar atrophyNormal
2720/Fc.433A>Cc.728C>TK145QP243LAtaxiaSevere impairment/ dementia, mutismNystagmusSpastic tetraparesis, increased tendon reflexes, Babinski signNo abnormalities reportedNormalGeneralized tonic-clonic seizures, UICerebellar atrophyNormal
P [151]28--Not reporterNervous system abnormalityc.268G>Tc.268G>TD90YD90YNot reported -WES study
Q [151]29--Not reportedNervous system abnormalityc.358+2T>Gc.358+2T>GIntronicIntronicNot reported -WES study
R [151]30--Not reporterNervous system abnormalityc.670-11_670-10delCTc.670-11_670-10delCTIntronicIntronicNot reported -WES study
S [151]31--Not reportedNervous system abnormalityc.844C>Gc.844C>GP282AP282ANot reported -WES study
T [145]32--EuropeanSCAR16c.433A>Cc.502C>TK145QL168FAtaxiaNot reported -WES study
U [171]3353/FSpanishSCA48c.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Ataxia, dysarthriaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedAnxiety, dysphagia, cachexia, UICerebellar atrophyNot reported
3452/Fc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Ataxia, dysarthriaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedAnxiety, dysphagia, cachexia, UICerebellar atrophyNot reported
3541/Fc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Ataxia, dysarthriaCCAS, aphasiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedAnxiety, dysphagia, strokeCerebellar atrophy, cerebellar and left cerebral hemisphere hypoperfusionNot reported
3653/Mc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16No ataxiaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophy, preserved cerebral perfusionNot reported
3742/Fc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Ataxia, dysarthriaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedAnxiety, organic personality disorder, dysphagia, UICerebellar atrophy, atrophy of frontal lobe, cerebellar hypoperfusionNot reported
3856/Mc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16No ataxiaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophy, preserved cerebral perfusionNot reported
39Fc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Ataxia, dysarthriaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedAnxietyCerebellar atrophyNot reported
4042/Fc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Ataxia, dysarthriaCCASNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedOrganic personality disorder, dysphagiaCerebellar atrophyNot reported
4133/Mc.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16No ataxiaNormalNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
V [146]4254/FNot reportedSCAR16c.103C>Ac.678_679delR35SI227Pfs*11Ataxia, dysarthriaSevere impairmentNystagmus, abnormal ocular pursuitNo abnormalities reportedChoreaNormal blood hormone levelsNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophy, hypoperfusion of fronto-parietal cortexNot reported
W [147]4357/MNot reportedSCAR16c.*204T>Cc.*204T>C3’UTR3’UTRAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalNormalPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
4437/Fc.*204T>Cc.*204T>C3’UTR3’UTRAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalNormalPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
4531/Fc.*204T>Cc.*204T>C3’UTR3’UTRAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNystagmusPyramidal features, increased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalDepressionCerebellar atrophyNot reported
X [172]4650/FItalianSCA48c.97G>AG33SAtaxia, dysarthriaMild cognitive impairment, memory impairment, executive dysfunctionNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedChorea, parkinsonismNot reportedPsychiatric symptoms, UINot reportedNot reported
4712/Fc.97G>AG33SAtaxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairment, memory impairment, executive dysfunctionNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesParkinsonismNot reportedGeneralized tonic-clonic seizures, dysphagia, psychiatric symptoms, UICerebellar atrophyNot reported
485/Mc.97G>AG33SAtaxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairment, memory impairment, executive dysfunctionNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesChorea, dystonia, parkinsonismNot reportedGeneralized tonic-clonic seizures, dysphagia, psychiatric symptomsCerebellar atrophyNot reported
4928/Fc.97G>AG33SAtaxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairment, memory impairment, executive dysfunctionNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesChorea, dystonia, parkinsonism, tremorNot reportedSeizures, dysphagia, psychiatric symptomsCerebellar atrophyNot reported
5045/Mc.97G>AG33SAtaxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairment, memory impairment, executive dysfunctionNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesDystonia, parkinsonism, tremorNot reportedGeneralized tonic-clonic seizures, dysphagia, psychiatric symptomsCerebellar atrophyNormal
5144/Mc.97G>AG33SAtaxia, dysarthriaMild cognitive impairment, memory impairment, executive dysfunctionNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedSeizures, dysphagia, hearing loss, psychiatric symptoms, UICerebellar atrophyNormal
Y [172]5255/MItalianSCA48c.682C>TP228SAtaxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedBlepharospasm, chorea, tongue tremorNot reportedDysphagia, psychiatric symptomsCerebellar atrophyNormal
5335/Mc.682C>TP228SAtaxia, dysarthriaMild cognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesTremorNot reportedDysphagia, hearing lossCerebellar atrophyNot reported
Z [173]5431/MItalianSCA48c.689_692delACCTY230Cfs*9Gait ataxia, dysarthriaNormalNystagmus, broken smooth pursuitIncreased tendon reflexesDystoniaLow testosteroneNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNormal
5548/Fc.689_692delACCTY230Cfs*9Gait ataxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairmentBroken smooth pursuitNormalChorea, dystonia, parkinsonismNormalDepression, UICerebellar atrophyNot reported
AA [173]5642/FItalianSCA48c.818_819dupGCP274Afs*3Gait ataxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairmentNormalNormalAnxiety, chorea, dystoniaNormalDysphagia, diabetes mellitus, UICerebellar atrophyNot reported
5734/Fc.818_819dupGCP274Afs*3Gait ataxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairmentBroken smooth pursuitIncreased tendon reflexesChoreaNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
AB [173]5856/MItalianSCA48c.791_792delTGV264Gfs*4Gait ataxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairmentBroken smooth pursuit, impersistenceNormalParkinsonismNormalDysphagiaCerebellar atrophyNormal
5940/Fc.791_792delTGV264Gfs*4Gait ataxia, dysarthriaModerate cognitive impairmentBroken smooth pursuit, slow saccadesNormalChoreaNormalFrontal meningiomaNot reportedNot reported
AC [173]6037/FItalianSCA48c.199G>AA67TGait ataxia, dysarthriaNormalImpersistenceIncreased tendon reflexesChorea, dystoniaNormalThyroid cancer, UICerebellar atrophyNormal
AD [173]6150/FItalianSCA48c.673C>TR225*Gait ataxia, dysarthriaNormalImpersistenceNormalNo abnormalities reportedNormalDysphagiaCerebellar atrophyNormal
AE [173]6246/FItalianSCA48c.721C>TR241WMild ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentAbnormalitiesNormalNo abnormalities reportedHypogonadismHashimoto’s thyroiditisCerebellar atrophyNormal
AF [173]6330/FItalianSCA48c.823_824delCTL275Dfs*16Gait ataxia, dysarthriaNormalNystagmusIncreased tendon reflexesChorea, parkinsonismNormalAnxiety, depression, dysphagia, UICerebellar atrophyNot reported
AG [173]6443/MItalianSCA48c.170C>TP57LGait ataxia, dysarthriaNo abnormalities reportedBroken smooth pursuit, hypometric saccadesIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNormalSelf-harm, dysphagia, tongue atrophyCerebellar atrophyNormal
AH [174]6551/FTurkishSCA48c.823_24delCTL275Dfs*16frameshiftGait ataxia, dysarthriaCCAS, apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedPyramidal features, Babinski signChorea, dystonia,parkinsonismNot reportedAnxiety, palilalia, dysphagia, cachexia, UICerebellar atrophy,hypoperfusion in frontal, parietal and temporal lobesNot reported
6660/FUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedAtaxiaCCAS, apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedChorea, dystonia, parkinsonismNot reportedPalilalia, cachexia, UINot reportedNot reported
6760/FUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedAtaxiaCCAS, apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedChorea, dystonia, parkinsonismNot reportedPalilalia, cachexia, UINot reportedNot reported
AI [175] 6841/MNot reportedSCA48c.158T>CI53TGait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment/dementiaSaccadic eye movementsIncreased tendon reflexesParkinsonismNot reportedDiabetes mellitus, sleep apneaCerebellar atrophy, mild cortical atrophyNot reported
6963/Mc.158T>CI53TGait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentSaccadic eye movementsIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophy at superior vermis and dorsal regionNot reported
7026/Mc.158T>CI53TGait ataxia, dysarthriaDementiaSaccadic smooth pursuit, hypermetric saccadesIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedDrug and alcohol abuseMarked cerebellar atrophyNot reported
71-/Fc.158T>CI53TGait ataxiaSevere cognitive impairment, childlike affectOccasional saccadic interruptionsIncreased tendon reflexesNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedAutism spectrum disorder, UISevere cerebellar atrophy, moderate cortical atrophyNot reported
AJ [175] 7241/FNot reportedSCA48c.111C>GF37LGait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, confusion, personality changeNystagmusNormalUnusual wing-beating tremorNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedMarked cerebellar atrophy, basis pontis flatteningNot reported
73-/MUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedAtaxiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
74-/FUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedPsychosisNot reportedNot reported
AK [148] 7545/FEuropeanSCAR16c.358+1G>Ac.566A>C--D189AAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalMild pursuit abnormalitiesIncreased tendon reflexesDystoniaNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar hemisphere and vermis atrophy, normal basal gangliaNormal
7646/FUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedNot reportedMemory impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedDysarthriaNot reportedNot reported
AL [176] 7771/-DutchSCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait ataxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedChoreaNot reportedSocial withdrawalNot reportedNot reported
7866/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
7972/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, memory defectsSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophy, generalized atrophyNot reported
8069/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, memory defects, apraxiaSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
8165/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24No ataxiaCognitive impairment, memory defects, impulsivitySaccadic pursuit, gaze palsyNo abnormalities reportedParkinsonismNot reportedDysarthriaCerebellar atrophy, generalized atrophyNot reported
8267/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, apraxiaNormalNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedGeneralized atrophyNot reported
8361/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, memory defectsGaze palsyNo abnormalities reportedChorea, parkinsonismNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
8450/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, aggressiveness, childish behaviorGaze palsyNo abnormalities reportedChoreaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
8567/-SCA48c.731_732delGCC244Yfs*24Gait/limb ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, impulsivity, memory defectsSaccadic pursuit, gaze palsyNo abnormalities reportedChorea, parkinsonismNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedGeneralized atrophyNot reported
86--UnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedMotor abnormalitiesCognitive abnormalitiesNot reported
87
88
89
90
91
AM [149] 9229/MTaiwaneseSCAR16c.433A>CC.721C>TK145QR241WGait ataxia, dysarthriaNormalCogwheel pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
AN [149] 9322/MTaiwaneseSCAR16C.433A>CC.694T>GK145QC232GGait ataxia, dysarthriaMild cognitive impairmentCogwheel pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNormal
9439/MSCAR16C.433A>CC.694T>GK145QC232GGait unsteadiness, dysarthriaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNormalNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
95-/MUnconfirmedUnconfirmedUnconfirmedGait difficultiesNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AO [150] 9644/MEuropeanSCA48c.338 C>AA113DAtaxiaNormalSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedMyoclonusNot reportedWeight lossNot reportedNot reported
9740/FSCA48c.338 C>AA113DAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNot reportedPyramidal featuresChoreaNot reportedLower limb wastingNot reportedNot reported
AP [150] 9830/MEuropeanSCA48c.728C>TP243LAtaxiaNormalNystagmus, saccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedLower limb wastingNot reportedNot reported
AQ [150] 9927/FEuropeanSCA48c.787-1G>CSplice acceptorAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, apathyNo abnormalities reportedBabinski signMyoclonusNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AR [150] 10051/FEuropeanSCA48c.194A>GN65SAtaxiaNormalNystagmus, ophthalmoplegiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedHearing lossNot reportedNot reported
10155/FSCA48c.194A>GN65SAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
10230/FSCA48c.194A>GN65SAtaxiaNormalNystagmus, saccadic pursuitBabinski signDystonia, retrocollisNot reportedScoliosisNot reportedNot reported
AS [150] 10329/FEuropeanSCA48c.596G>T*c.635A>G*C199FD212GAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNystagmus, saccadic pursuitPyramidal features, Babinski signNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
10423/FSCA48c.596G>T*c.635A>G*C199FD212GAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNystagmus, saccadic pursuitPyramidal features, Babinski signNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedDecreased vibration senseNot reportedNot reported
10529/MSCA48c.596G>T*c.635A>G*C199FD212GAtaxiaNormalSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedTremorNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AT [150] 10660/FEuropeanSCA48c.136G>CA46PAtaxiaNormalNystagmusNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
10738/FSCA48c.136G>CA46PAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedHypokinesia, facial choreaNot reportedScoliosisCerebellar, cortical, and pons atrophyNot reported
10847/FSCA48c.136G>CA46PAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, aggressiveNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedChorea, facial dystoniaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AU [150] 10930/FEuropeanSCA48c.460C>TR154CAtaxiaCognitive impairment, frontal syndrome, pseudobulbar affectSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedHypokinesiaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AV [150] 11030/MEuropeanSCA48c.358+2T>CSplice donorAtaxia, spastic gaitCognitive impairment, frontal syndromeNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedChoreaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AW [150] 11152/FEuropeanSCA48c.426_428delK143delAtaxiaCCAS, FTD- likeNystagmusNo abnormalities reportedHypokinesia, myokymiaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AX [150] 11227/FEuropeanSCA48c.194A>GN65SAtaxiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AY [150] 11353/FEuropeanSCA48c.440G>AW147*Ataxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedBabinski signAxial hypertonusNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
AZ [150] 11440/MEuropeanSCA48c.136G>CY49CAtaxia, dysarthria, dysmetriaCognitive impairment, FTD-like, apraxiaSaccadic pursuit, nystagmusNo abnormalities reportedDystoniaNot reportedWeight loss, lower limb wastingCerebellar atrophyNot reported
11551/FSCA48c.136G>CY49CAtaxia, dysarthriaCCAS, pseudobulbar affectNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedDysphoniaNot reportedNot reported
11638/FSCA48c.136G>CY49CAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, frontal syndromeDiplopia, ptosisNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedCerebellar atrophyNot reported
BA [150] 11741/FEuropeanSCA48c.194A>GN65SAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, frontal syndromeOculomotor apraxia, slow saccadesNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BB [150] 118-/FEuropeanSCA48c.301G>CG101RAtaxiaNormalSlow saccadesNo abnormalities reportedNeck and shoulder dystoniaNot reportedFasciculationsNot reportedNot reported
11925/MSCA48c.301G>CG101RAtaxiaNormalDiplopia, nystagmus, saccadic pursuitBabinski signNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
12030/MSCA48c.301G>CG101RAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalNystagmus, saccadic pursuits, ophthalmoplegiaPyramidal featuresHead tremorNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
12150/FSCA48c.301G>CG101RAtaxiaCognitive impairment, apathySlow saccades, saccadic pursuitBabinski signTremor, hypokinesiaNot reportedEpilepsyNot reportedNot reported
122-/FSCA48c.301G>CG101RAtaxiaNormalSaccadic pursuit, ophthalmoplegiaBabinski signNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedDecreased vibration senseNot reportedNot reported
BC [150] 123-/FEuropeanSCA48c.824delTL275Rfs*11AtaxiaNormalSlow saccades, oculomotor apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedTremorNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BD [150] 12440/FEuropeanSCA48c.235G>CA79PAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedBabinski signNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedEpilepsyNot reportedNot reported
BE [150] 12533/FEuropeanSCA48c.728C>TP243LAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalNystagmusPyramidal featuresFacial dystoniaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BF [150] 12650/MEuropeanSCA48c.665G>AR222KAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalSlow saccades, saccadic pursuitBabinski signTremorNot reportedOrthostatic hypotensionNot reportedNot reported
BG [150] 12748/FEuropeanSCA48c.849C>GN283KAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BH [150] 12865/FEuropeanSCA48c.544C>TR182*AtaxiaCCAS, frontal syndromeNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedCJD-likeNot reportedNot reported
BI [150] 12965/FEuropeanSCA48c.221A>CQ74PAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentOculomotor apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedFacial dysmorphismNot reportedNot reported
BJ [150] 13044/MEuropeanSCA48c.206G>AC69YAtaxiaCognitive impairmentSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedCataractNot reportedNot reported
BK [150] 13167/FEuropeanSCA48c.794G>AG265DAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairmentSlow saccades, saccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedFXTAS-likeNot reportedCataractNot reportedNot reported
BL [150] 13260/MEuropeanSCA48c.170C>TP57LAtaxiaCognitive impairment, impulsive, aggressiveDiplopia, ptosisBabinski signTremor, rigidityNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
13340/FSCA48c.170C>TP57LAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalDiplopia, ptosisNo abnormalities reportedHypokinesiaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
13440/FSCA48c.170C>TP57LAtaxia, dysarthriaNormalNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BM [150] 13527/FEuropeanSCA48c.426_428delK143delAtaxiaNormalNystagmus, saccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedCervical dystoniaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
136MSCA48c.426_428delK143delNo ataxiaNormalSaccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BN [150] 13751/WEuropeanSCA48c.146A>GY49CAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, frontal syndromeNo abnormalities reportedIncreased tendon reflexesChorea, dystonia, rigidityNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
13837/MSCA48c.146A>GY49CAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, behavior changeSlow saccades, saccadic pursuit, oculomotor apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedChorea, myoclonusNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
13937/FSCA48c.146A>GY49CAtaxia, dysarthriaCognitive impairment, behavior changeSlow saccades, saccadic pursuit, oculomotor apraxiaNo abnormalities reportedChorea, myoclonus, rigidityNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
140-/WSCA48c.146A>GY49CAtaxiaNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BO [150] 14174/WEuropeanSCA48c.206G>AC69YAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNystagmus, slow saccades, ophthalmoplegiaNo abnormalities reportedTremor, hypokinesiaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BP [150] 142-/WEuropeanSCA48c.502C>TL168FAtaxiaMild cognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BQ [150] 14320/MEuropeanSCAR16c.359C>Tc.632T>CA120VM211TAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNystagmus, saccadic pursuitNo abnormalities reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
14421/FSCAR16c.359C>Tc.632T>CA120VM211TAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedBabinski signVoice and neck dystoniaNot reportedNo abnormalities reportedNot reportedNot reported
BR [150] 14517/MEuropeanSCAR16c.691C>Gc.691C>GL231VL231VAtaxiaCognitive impairmentNo abnormalities reportedBabinski signNo abnormalities reportedHypogonadismDysphagia, UINot reportedNot reported

Grey boxes indicate patients with disease symptoms who did not have genetic testing. These patients without a confirmed genotype were not included in patient numbers indicated within the manuscript text. Where only one STUB1 mutation/CHIP mutation is indicated, the patient is heterozygous with one mutant allele and one wild-type allele. AAO: age at disease onset; CCAS: cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome; CJD: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; FTD: frontotemporal dementia; FXTAS: fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome; NCV: nerve conduction velocity; SCA48: spinocerebellar ataxia autosomal dominant type 48; SCAR16: spinocerebellar ataxia autosomal recessive type 16; T1D: type 1 diabetes; UI: urinary incontinence; UTR: untranslated region; WES: whole exome sequencing. *Variants in cis.

  188 in total

1.  SIFT missense predictions for genomes.

Authors:  Robert Vaser; Swarnaseetha Adusumalli; Sim Ngak Leng; Mile Sikic; Pauline C Ng
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Most mutations that cause spinocerebellar ataxia autosomal recessive type 16 (SCAR16) destabilize the protein quality-control E3 ligase CHIP.

Authors:  Adam J Kanack; Oliver J Newsom; Kenneth Matthew Scaglione
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 acetylates and disrupts the chaperone function of heat shock protein 90: a novel basis for antileukemia activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Purva Bali; Michael Pranpat; James Bradner; Maria Balasis; Warren Fiskus; Fei Guo; Kathy Rocha; Sandhya Kumaraswamy; Sandhya Boyapalle; Peter Atadja; Edward Seto; Kapil Bhalla
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  CHIP Is an Essential Determinant of Neuronal Mitochondrial Stress Signaling.

Authors:  Amy M Palubinsky; Jeannette N Stankowski; Alixandra C Kale; Simona G Codreanu; Robert J Singer; Daniel C Liebler; Gregg D Stanwood; BethAnn McLaughlin
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 8.401

5.  Reduction of protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation of ATXN1-S776 in Purkinje cells delays onset of Ataxia in a SCA1 mouse model.

Authors:  Judit M Pérez Ortiz; Nissa Mollema; Nicholas Toker; Carolyn J Adamski; Brennon O'Callaghan; Lisa Duvick; Jillian Friedrich; Michael A Walters; Jessica Strasser; Jon E Hawkinson; Huda Y Zoghbi; Christine Henzler; Harry T Orr; Sarita Lagalwar
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.996

6.  Expression of a ubiquitous, cross-reactive homologue of the mouse beta-amyloid precursor protein (APP).

Authors:  H H Slunt; G Thinakaran; C Von Koch; A C Lo; R E Tanzi; S S Sisodia
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Loss of HDAC6, a novel CHIP substrate, alleviates abnormal tau accumulation.

Authors:  Casey Cook; Tania F Gendron; Kristyn Scheffel; Yari Carlomagno; Judy Dunmore; Michael DeTure; Leonard Petrucelli
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  K63 linked ubiquitin chain formation is a signal for HIF1A degradation by Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy.

Authors:  Joao Vasco Ferreira; Ana Rosa Soares; Jose Silva Ramalho; Paulo Pereira; Henrique Girao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Regulation of LRRK2 stability by the E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP.

Authors:  Xiaodong Ding; Matthew S Goldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interactions between the quality control ubiquitin ligase CHIP and ubiquitin conjugating enzymes.

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Ekta Kohli; Karl I Devlin; Michael Bold; Jay C Nix; Saurav Misra
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2008-05-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Severe Dementia Syndrome Caused by Intron Retention and Cryptic Splice Site Activation in STUB1 and Exacerbated by TBP Repeat Expansions.

Authors:  Marlen Colleen Reis; Julia Patrun; Nibal Ackl; Pia Winter; Maximilian Scheifele; Adrian Danek; Dagmar Nolte
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.