| Literature DB >> 33195983 |
Kristijan Bogdanovski1, Trisha Chau1, Chevalia J Robinson1, Sandra D MacDonald1, Ann M Peterson2, Christine M Mashek2, Windy A Wallin3, Mark Rimkus4, Frederick Montgomery4, Joas Lucas da Silva1, Shashank Gupta1, Abdi Ghaffari4, Adrian M Zelazny5, Kenneth N Olivier1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Mycobacterium abscessus is an emerging pulmonary pathogen with limited treatment options. Nitric oxide (NO) demonstrates antibacterial activity against various bacterial species, including mycobacteria. In this study, we evaluated the effect of adjunctive inhaled NO therapy, using a novel NO generator, in a CF patient with pulmonary M. abscessus disease, and examined heterogeneity of response to NO in vitro.Entities:
Keywords: Mycobacterium abscessus; antibacterial activity; drug discovery; nitric oxide; nontuberculous mycobacteria
Year: 2020 PMID: 33195983 PMCID: PMC7656188 DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000154
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Access Microbiol ISSN: 2516-8290
Clinical isolates tested for in vitro NO susceptibility
|
|
Subspecies |
Patient source |
Clinical time point |
Morphology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MAB-110917–1505 |
|
Current report |
Late infection prior to NO Rx |
Rough |
|
MAB-062600–1635 |
|
Outbreak [ |
Early infection, clinical stability |
Smooth |
|
MAB-030804–1651 |
|
Outbreak [ |
4 years after, clinical stability |
Smooth |
|
MAB-010708–1655 |
|
Outbreak [ |
8 years after initial isolate, post-rapid clinical decline |
Rough |
Fig. 1.Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire – Revised (CFQ-R). Selected domain scores from course #1 (a) and course #2 (b) of high-dose intermittent NO treatment are shown. Domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to higher quality of life. A minimal clinically important difference of 4.0 points has been determined in stable patients for the respiratory domain [26].
Selected efficacy measures – course #1 NO therapy
|
Course #1 |
Days |
FEV1 (%) |
FVC (%) |
DLCO |
6MWD (m) |
6MWT (preSpO |
6MWT (postSpO |
CRP (mg dl−1) |
ESR (mm h−1) |
AFB stain [ |
AFB culture [ |
Time to (+) culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen |
Baseline |
39 |
50 |
37 |
410 |
98 |
90 |
51 |
29 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/7 h |
|
iNO |
7 |
37 |
53 |
399 |
98 |
89 |
32 |
25 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/18 h | |
|
14 |
40 |
59 |
379 |
98 |
91 |
14 |
18 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/4 h | ||
|
21 |
42 |
58 |
34 |
426 |
99 |
93 |
37 |
22 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/7 h | |
|
Follow-up |
51 |
41 |
59 |
503 |
99 |
91 |
20 |
17 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/2 h | |
|
81 |
42 |
60 |
459 |
100 |
95 |
35 |
34 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/9 h | ||
|
111 |
41 |
56 |
471 |
99 |
97 |
17 |
26 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/0 h | ||
|
141 |
38 |
58 |
40 |
362 |
99 |
94 |
18 |
28 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/2 h |
FEV1, forced expiratory volume; FVC, forced vital capacity; DLCOadj, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; 6MWD, 6 min walk distance; 6MWT, 6 min walk test; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; AFB, acid-fast bacillus.
Fig. 2.Methemoglobin levels. MetHb levels by treatment day from treatment course #1 (a) and #2 (b) measured at the start and end of each NO inhalation cycle (depicted by dots) using a pulse oximeter. MetHb levels increased after each inhaled NO cycle but returned to baseline levels following the period between intermittent NO inhalations. Levels did not exceed safety limits of <10%.
Selected efficacy measures – course #2 NO therapy
|
Course #1 |
Days |
FEV1 (%) |
FVC (%) |
DLCO |
6MWD (m) |
6MWT (preSpO |
6MWT (postSpO |
CRP (mg dl−1) |
ESR (mm h−1) |
AFB stain [ |
AFB culture [ |
Time to (+) culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Screen |
Baseline |
38 |
58 |
40 |
362 |
99 |
94 |
18 |
28 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/2 h |
|
iNO |
7 |
39 |
54 |
UTC |
UTC |
UTC |
17 |
33 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/4 h | |
|
Follow-up |
51 |
40 |
57 |
427 |
96 |
90 |
30 |
38 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/6 h | |
|
81 |
42 |
57 |
479 |
98 |
92 |
25 |
29 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/9 h | ||
|
111 |
39 |
53 |
466 |
96 |
90 |
21 |
26 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/9 h | ||
|
141 |
40 |
57 |
471 |
95 |
90 |
5 |
26 |
4+ |
4+ |
2 days/3 h |
FEV1, forced expiratory volume; FVC, vorced vital capacity; DLCOadj, diffusion capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide; 6MWD, 6 min walk distance; 6MWT, 6 min walk test; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; AFB, acid-fast bacillus.
Fig. 3.Dose–response effect of NO against subspecies in artificial sputum. A time–kill assay was performed using MAB_062600_1635 (early clinical infection strain, smooth colony) cultured in artificial sputum and treated with different concentrations of NO (0, 160, 250, 300, 400 p.p.m.). The means and standard error of mean of at least three independent experiments are shown. Significant differences from control were observed at 4 h for 160 and 250 p.p.m. (P≤0.01), at 2 h for 300 p.p.m. (P≤0.01) and at 2 h for 400 p.p.m. (P≤0.001).
Fig. 4.Time–kill curves of clinical isolates treated with NO. Survival curves for the patient’s strain (a) and comparison serial clinical isolates (b–d) are shown (at least three replicates). Bacteria cultured in artificial sputum were treated with humidified air (control) or 250 p.p.m. NO continuously for up to 10 h. (e) Mean Hill’s slopes for NO-treated clinical isolates were calculated using a nonlinear regression sigmoidal dose–response model. The Mann–Whitney test was used to calculate the P value between the patient’s strain (1505) Hill’s slope and that for the most susceptible comparison strain (1635).