| Literature DB >> 28750737 |
Robert P Howlin1, Katrina Cathie2, Luanne Hall-Stoodley3, Victoria Cornelius4, Caroline Duignan5, Raymond N Allan6, Bernadette O Fernandez7, Nicolas Barraud8, Ken D Bruce9, Johanna Jefferies10, Michael Kelso11, Staffan Kjelleberg12, Scott A Rice12, Geraint B Rogers13, Sandra Pink14, Caroline Smith14, Priya S Sukhtankar15, Rami Salib16, Julian Legg14, Mary Carroll14, Thomas Daniels14, Martin Feelisch16, Paul Stoodley17, Stuart C Clarke10, Gary Connett14, Saul N Faust18, Jeremy S Webb1.
Abstract
Despite aggressive antibiotic therapy, bronchopulmonary colonization by Species">Pseudomonas aeruginosa causes persistent morbidity and mortality inEntities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; cystic fibrosis; nitric oxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28750737 PMCID: PMC5589160 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.06.021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther ISSN: 1525-0016 Impact factor: 11.454
Figure 1Role of NO in Disrupting Antibiotic Tolerance Mechanisms Associated with the Biofilm Structure
(1) Biofilm tolerance mechanisms include reduced antibiotic diffusion, release of protective enzymes capable of destroying or inactivating antibiotics in the biofilm matrix, and formation of physiologically distinct bacterial subpopulations (e.g., persister cells) resulting from nutrient and oxygen gradients. (2) Low-dose NO diffuses into the biofilm and interacts with cell receptors that upregulate cellular phosphodiesterases (PDEs), which accelerate c-di-GMP degradation. This prevents c-di-GMP from interacting with proteins at the transcriptional, translational, or post-translational level and leads to cell surface and physiological changes associated with dispersal and motility (red circle inset). (3) Dispersal is accompanied by reversion of the bacteria to a planktonic phenotype that renders them more susceptible to antibiotic-mediated killing.18, 19
Figure 2NO Disperses P. aeruginosa Biofilms In Vitro and In Cystic Fibrosis Sputum
(A) Direct measurement of NO-induced P. aeruginosa biofilm dispersal in expectorated CF sputum samples. Image analysis shows a significant reduction in mean P. aeruginosa biofilm thickness following treatment of CF sputum samples from three different patients (samples 1, 2, and 3) with 450 nM NO compared with buffer alone (untreated) (*p = 0.02, representing a statistically significant difference between data medians). P. aeruginosa was identified using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with both a Cy3-labeled P. aeruginosa-specific 16S rRNA probe (green) and a Cy5-labeled eubacterial 16S probe (red). Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) images show a reduction of P. aeruginosa (yellow because of hybridization with both probes) in biofilms. Images show horizontal xy (top-down view) sections, and flanking images show vertical z (side view) CSLM sections of untreated (left) and NO-treated (right) CF sputum samples. Scale bars, 25 μm. (B) Nitric oxide (NO) disperses in vitro biofilms grown from biofilm-forming P. aeruginosa CF clinical isolates. Dispersal of biofilm bacteria into the planktonic phase (measured by mean OD of overlying planktonic suspensions) following treatment of a clinical P. aeruginosa biofilm isolate with low-dose NO (9 pM to 4.5 μM) derived from the spontaneous NO donor SNP. The depicted recordings are from a single isolate and representative of qualitatively identical data from 12 P. aeruginosa isolates studied. (C) Biofilm dispersal is NO-dependent. Mean OD measurements of planktonic bacteria following 15-hr treatment of P. aeruginosa biofilms with SNP alone, SNP in the presence of the NO scavenger PTIO, or with potassium ferricyanide alone (PFc). *p = 0.02, representing a statistically significant difference between data medians). Data are from three experiments with four wells per experiment. (D) Dispersal causes biofilm detachment from the base of tissue culture plate wells, indicated by loss of fluorescence after NO treatment, compared with untreated controls. Residual biofilms were fluorescently labeled with the nucleic acid probe Syto9. The scale indicates fluorescence intensity, with red corresponding to the highest concentration of surface-attached P. aeruginosa and blue-purple corresponding to the fewest remaining attached bacteria. (E) NO induces dispersal of P. aeruginosa biofilms in vitro. Representative CSLM images indicate reduced P. aeruginosa in biofilms from CF isolates following NO treatment compared with untreated biofilms. Each image shows horizontal xy (top-down view) CLSM sections (square), and flanking images show vertical z (side view) CLSM sections after staining biofilms with the BacLight Live (green)/Dead (red) kit. Scale bars, 25 μm.
Figure 3Antibiotic Efficacy against P. aeruginosa Clinical Isolate Biofilms Is Enhanced in the Presence of Low-Dose NO
(A) Representative CLSM images showing surface-attached P. aeruginosa following treatment with buffer alone (untreated), NO alone, MBC antibiotics (5 μg ml−1 tobramycin with or without 5 μg ml−1 ceftazadime), or antibiotics combined with NO. Images show horizontal xy (top-down view) sections, and flanking images show vertical z (side view) CSLM sections. Biofilms were stained with the BacLight Live (green)/Dead (red) kit to indicate viable cells. Scale bars, 25 μm. (B and C) Image analysis of CLSM images of residual P. aeruginosa biofilms with adjunctive NO shows a reduction in mean total biomass (B) and biofilm thickness (C) following treatment with antibiotics (tobramycin alone and tobramycin [Tob]/ceftazidime [Ceft] combined), indicating that NO treatment reduces the amount of remaining biofilm bacteria (error bars represent SEM of five different microscopic fields). An increase in biofilm biomass and biofilm thickness is shown following tobramycin treatment alone (biofilm biomass: 243% increase compared with control, p = 0.028, B; mean biofilm thickness: 199% increase compared with control, p = 0.065, C) and the tobramycin/ceftazidime combination (biofilm biomass: 155% increase compared with control, p = 0.04, B; mean biofilm thickness: 174% increase compared with control, p = 0.04, C). (D) Viable P. aeruginosa in the dispersed population (planktonic suspension), determined by colony-forming unit (CFU) counts of P. aeruginosa following antibiotic treatment of biofilms with or without NO, indicate that combined NO treatment leads to killing of the bacteria released from the biofilm.
Figure 4Clinical Study CONSORT Diagram Depicting the Flow of Patients through the Study
For patients to be randomized, they had to be admitted during pulmonary exacerbation to receive trial therapy concurrently with i.v. antibiotics.
Figure 5Reduction in P. aeruginosa Biofilm with NO Adjunctive Therapy
Shown are representative FISH confocal images from a CF patient being treated with NO adjunctive to conventional antimicrobial agents (ceftazadime and tobramycin) compared with a patient on antibiotics alone (n = 6 in both the NO and placebo groups). Almost no P. aeruginosa biofilms were detectable in the treatment group compared with placebo. At follow-up, 10–13 days after NO adjunctive treatment stopped, pseudomonal biofilm was detected in sputum, having been reduced while on NO. Scale bars, 25 μm. The central panels show xy plan views of merged image stacks (total biofilm detected in 3D imaging), and the rectangular z axis side panels show representative single side views of the biofilm.
Primary Outcome Results Showing Mean Differences between the NO or Placebo Groups of Change from Baseline
| Change from Baseline, Mean (SD) | Treatment Effect: Mean Difference (95% CI), p Value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | 5 | 7 | 10 | 20 | Intervention Period (Days 5 and 7) | Study Period (Days 5, 7, 10, and 20) | ||
| Placebo | 0.11 (2.38) | 0.35 (1.44) | 0.38 (2.32) | NA | 3.49 (0.32, 6.67) | p = 0.031 | 1.35 (−0.58, 3.7) | p = 0.170 |
| NO | −4.33 (5.11) | −2.19 (3.93) | 0.98 (1.83) | NA | ||||
| Placebo | −0.16 (2.51) | −0.03 (1.54) | 0.21 (2.20) | NA | 4.47 (−0.40,8.98) | p = 0.052 | 2.35 (0.08, 4.63) | p = 0.043 |
| NO | −6.10 (7.50) | −3.03 (5.88) | 0.97 (2.02) | NA | ||||
| Placebo | 0.28 (2.09) | 0.26 (1.52) | 0.20 (2.04) | NA | 2.44 (0.25, 4.62) | p = 0.029 | 1.09 (−0.54, 2.72) | p = 0.118 |
| NO | −1.46 (1.08) | −2.71 (4.56) | 1.10 (1.19) | NA | ||||
| Placebo | 0.08 (2.33) | 0.05 (1.50) | −2.47 (2.12) | NA | 2.68 (-.052, 5.41) | p = 0.055 | 1.27 (−0.62, 3.16) | p = 0.188 |
| NO | −1.75 (1.14) | −3.37 (6.34) | 1.07 (1.50) | NA | ||||
CI, confidence interval; Ln, natural logarithm; NA, not analyzed.
Microbiological and Clinical Safety Monitoring Showing Mean Differences between the NO or Placebo Groups of Change from Baseline
| Change from Baseline, Mean (SD) | Treatment Effect, Mean (95% CI), p Value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | 5 | 7 | 10 | 20 | Intervention Period (Days 5 and 7) | Total Study Period (Days 5, 7, 10, and 20) | ||
| Placebo | −1.62 (2.34) | −2 (3.77) | −0.89 (4.08) | NA | −0.19 (−2.95, 2.56) | p = 0.891 | 0.03 (−2.53, 2.59) | p = 0.980 |
| NO | −1.97 (2.20) | −1.25 (2.76) | −1.30 (1.64) | NA | ||||
| Placebo | −2.16 (1.73) | −4.33 (2.44) | −4.32 (1.92) | NA | −0.47 (−1.91, 0.97) | p = 0.519 | −0.37 (−1.44, 0.71) | p = 0.504 |
| NO | −1.86 (1.60) | −3.67 (1.81) | −3.09 (1.74) | NA | ||||
| Day | 5 | 7 | 10 | 20 | Intervention Period (Day 7 Only) | Study Period (Day 20 Only) | ||
| Placebo | NA | 6.67 (4.46) | 9.00 (2.52) | 6.17 (3.49) | −8.93 (−25.3, 7.42) | p = 0.248 | 1.95 (−7.31, 11.20) | p = 0.645 |
| NO | NA | 15.6 (17.2) | 5.01 (14.2) | 4.22 (9.35) | ||||
| Placebo | NA | 4.83 (6.74) | 9.17 (5.46) | 6.33 (4.46) | −11.6 (−30.7, 8.42) | p = 0.229 | 8.03 (−4.10, 20.2) | p = 0.168 |
| NO | NA | 16.0 (20.1) | 3.75 (14.6) | −1.70 (12.3) | ||||
Baseline Clinical Characteristics of Groups
| Treatment Group | n | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | A | 6 | 30.0 | 13.99 |
| B | 6 | 29.3 | 15.60 | |
| Height (cm) | A | 6 | 162.8 | 9.45 |
| B | 6 | 166.0 | 9.27 | |
| Weight (kg) | A | 6 | 56.4 | 9.61 |
| B | 6 | 63.0 | 8.32 | |
| Heart rate (bpm) | A | 6 | 89.3 | 18.62 |
| B | 6 | 91.2 | 17.19 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | A | 6 | 107.3 | 13.84 |
| B | 6 | 121.0 | 14.97 | |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | A | 6 | 64.2 | 9.37 |
| B | 6 | 75.8 | 13.73 | |
| Oxygen saturation (% in air) | A | 6 | 95.2 | 2.23 |
| B | 6 | 95.2 | 3.25 | |
| Respiratory rate (per minute) | A | 6 | 20.0 | 1.10 |
| B | 6 | 18.5 | 2.17 | |
| Temperature (°C) | A | 5 | 36.8 | .31 |
| B | 6 | 36.9 | .48 | |
| FEV1 % of predicted (l) | A | 6 | 40.2 | 20.14 |
| B | 6 | 45.7 | 18.28 | |
| FVC % of predicted (l) | A | 6 | 54.4 | 17.60 |
| B | 6 | 71.5 | 21.11 | |
| Average exhaled NO levels (ppb) | A | 6 | 12.7 | 9.46 |
| B | 6 | 9.3 | 8.86 |
A, NO group; B, placebo group.