Literature DB >> 33194198

Post-radiotherapy hysterectomy does not benefit females with cervical adenocarcinoma.

Elen Cristiane Augusto Souza1, Daniel Zaidan Santos1, Jose Carlos Campos Torres1, Diama Bhadra Vale1, Joana Froes Bragança1, Julio Cesar Teixeira1.   

Abstract

Cervical adenocarcinoma is associated with a poor prognosis, which may be caused by the infiltrative growth pattern and metastasis of tumor cells. There is a lack of consensus on hysterectomy after radiotherapy for the improvement of selected cases. The present study aimed to assess the oncological outcome of post-radiotherapy hysterectomy in females with cervical adenocarcinoma. A total of 39 females with cervical adenocarcinoma at stages IB1 to IIIB, managed primarily with radiotherapy with complete response, and underwent extrafascial hysterectomy as consolidation therapy between 1988 to 2015 were studied. Surgery complications and residual disease were evaluated. A comparison group was constructed, comprising 41 females with cervical adenocarcinoma managed with exclusive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy demonstrating complete response, without surgery. Descriptive and survival analysis was performed. The groups were comparable in terms of age, cancer stage, radiotherapy (dose and duration) and follow-up, although 67% of hysterectomies were performed prior to 2002 and 46% of the radiotherapy group received chemoradiation. Late complications were similar. There were nine recurrences (23%) in the case series and 10 recurrences (24%) in the radiotherapy group. Residual disease was detected in 56% (22/39) of uterine specimens, of which 12 were up to 10 mm. Residual disease was associated with recurrence (31% vs. 6%, P=0.028). The overall survival rate was 75% for the case series vs. 88% for the radiotherapy group (P=0.579), and the disease-free survival rate was 79-80% for both. Removal of residual disease by hysterectomy did not improve the overall survival rate (P=0.283) and disease-free survival rate (P=0.072). Post-radiotherapy hysterectomy in cervical adenocarcinoma is a feasible procedure with acceptable complications, however, it did not bring relevant benefits in recurrences, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates.
Copyright © 2020, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adenocarcinoma; cervical cancer; hysterectomy; radiotherapy; survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 33194198      PMCID: PMC7657080          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2020.2162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  16 in total

1.  FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and corpus uteri.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Post radiation hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Outcomes and dosimetric impact.

Authors:  Renaud Mazeron; Sébastien Gouy; Cyrus Chargari; Eleonor Rivin Del Campo; Isabelle Dumas; Augustin Mervoyer; Catherine Genestie; Enrica Bentivegna; Corinne Balleyguier; Patricia Pautier; Philippe Morice; Christine Haie-Meder
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Completion surgery or not after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer?

Authors:  Pierre Lèguevaque; Stéphanie Motton; Martine Delannes; Denis Querleu; Marc Soulé-Tholy; Gerard Tap; Gilles Houvenaeghel
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Long-term outcome and prognostic factors for adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of cervix after definitive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yi-Ting Huang; Chun-Chieh Wang; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Chyong-Huey Lai; Ting-Chang Chang; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Swei Hsueh; Chien-Kuang Chen; Steve P Lee; Ji-Hong Hong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; San-Gang Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Qiong-Hua Chen; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  History of the FIGO cancer staging system.

Authors:  Franco Odicino; Sergio Pecorelli; Lucia Zigliani; William T Creasman
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.561

7.  Adenocarcinoma histology is a poor prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Joanna Jonska-Gmyrek; Leszek Gmyrek; Agnieszka Zolciak-Siwinska; Maria Kowalska; Beata Kotowicz
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 2.580

8.  Radiation therapy with and without extrafascial hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  Henry M Keys; Brian N Bundy; Frederick B Stehman; Takashi Okagaki; Donald G Gallup; Alexander F Burnett; Marvin Z Rotman; Wesley C Fowler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Cervical Cancer Registered in Two Developed Regions from Brazil: Upper Limit of Reachable Results from Opportunistic Screening.

Authors:  Julio Cesar Teixeira; Carlos Afonso Maestri; Helymar da Costa Machado; Luiz Carlos Zeferino; Newton Sérgio de Carvalho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet       Date:  2018-06-20

10.  The effect of surgery on the survival status of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Shi; Zhenzhen Liang; Cheng Zhang; Huaiyu Zhang; Xiaodong Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.