Literature DB >> 27492204

Post radiation hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: Outcomes and dosimetric impact.

Renaud Mazeron1, Sébastien Gouy2, Cyrus Chargari3, Eleonor Rivin Del Campo3, Isabelle Dumas4, Augustin Mervoyer5, Catherine Genestie6, Enrica Bentivegna2, Corinne Balleyguier7, Patricia Pautier8, Philippe Morice2, Christine Haie-Meder3.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: Firstly, to evaluate the impact of completion hysterectomy after chemoradiation and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer. Secondly, to assess a potential differential dose-effect relationship for the rectum and bladder according to the realization of hysterectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients were identified, differing by the realization of completion hysterectomy. Inclusions were limited to FIGO stage I-II, with no para-aortic involvement. All patients received a combination of pelvic chemoradiation followed by IGABT. Their outcomes and morbidity were reviewed. Log-rank tests were used to compare survivals. Probit analyses were performed to study dose-volume effect relationships.
RESULTS: The two cohorts comprised 54 patients in the completion surgery group and 157 patients in the definitive radiotherapy group. They were well balanced, except for the mean follow-up, significantly longer in the post hysterectomy cohort and the use of PET-CT in the work-up, more frequent in the definitive radiotherapy cohort. Although less local relapses were reported in the hysterectomy group, the 5-year disease-free and overall survival did not differ between groups. The cumulative incidence of severe late morbidity was significantly increased in the hysterectomy cohort: 22.5% versus 6.5% at 5years (p=0.016). Dose-volume effects were observed for the bladder, with the D2cm3 corresponding with a 10% probability of late severe morbidity urinary events (ED10) of 67.8Gy and 91.9Gy in the hysterectomy and definitive radiotherapy cohorts, respectively. A D90 CTVHR of 85Gy (planning aim) corresponded with a 93.3% rate of local control in the definitive radiotherapy cohort whereas it corresponded with a 77.3% chance to have a good histologic response (complete response or microscopic residual disease) in the hysterectomy group.
CONCLUSION: No benefit from completion hysterectomy in terms of overall or disease-free survival rates was observed, which was moreover responsible for an increase of the severe late morbidity. The realization of post-radiation hysterectomy resulted in a shift of the ED10 of 24.1Gy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervix cancer; Chemoradiation; Hysterectomy; Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy; Late morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27492204     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current Standards in the Management of Early and Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Update on the Benefit of Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Strategies.

Authors:  Yuedan Zhou; Elie Rassy; Alexandre Coutte; Samir Achkar; Sophie Espenel; Catherine Genestie; Patricia Pautier; Philippe Morice; Sébastien Gouy; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Post-radiotherapy hysterectomy does not benefit females with cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Elen Cristiane Augusto Souza; Daniel Zaidan Santos; Jose Carlos Campos Torres; Diama Bhadra Vale; Joana Froes Bragança; Julio Cesar Teixeira
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

3.  Indocyanine Green-Based Theranostic Nanoplatform for NIR Fluorescence Image-Guided Chemo/Photothermal Therapy of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Rong Ma; Nuernisha Alifu; Zhong Du; Shuang Chen; Youqiang Heng; Jing Wang; Lijun Zhu; Cailing Ma; Xueliang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-07-17

4.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

5.  Chemoradiotherapy alone vs. chemoradiotherapy and hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weijia Lu; Canxiong Lu; Zhiwu Yu; Lei Gao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  The effect of surgery on the survival status of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer after radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dan Shi; Zhenzhen Liang; Cheng Zhang; Huaiyu Zhang; Xiaodong Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Surgery of primary sites for stage IVB cervical cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Haoran Li; Yangyang Pang; Xi Cheng
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.