Literature DB >> 33186270

A Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for the Detection of Metastatic Axillary Nodal Disease in Treatment-Naive Breast Cancer.

Viet T Le1, Franklin C Wong2, Roland L Bassett3, Gary J Whitman.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to describe the diagnostic value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and ultrasound (US) for identifying metastatic axillary disease in primary breast cancer. This is a retrospective review of 240 patients with treatment-naive unilateral primary breast cancer of at least stage T2. Eighty-five patients met our inclusion criteria. Initial whole-body PET/CT and axillary US examinations were reviewed and compared with the criterion standard of fine-needle aspiration cytology. Sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive value (PPV) for each modality were computed. Because of all positive US cases, specificity and negative predictive value of US were not determined. Sensitivity and accuracy between modalities were compared using McNemar test. The majority of the patients were White women with clinical inflammatory breast cancer and with histologically invasive ductal carcinoma. The most common tumor and nodal stage was T4N3. The tumors were predominantly estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative. The sensitivities of PET/CT and US were 96.2% and 100%, respectively. The accuracies for PET/CT and US were 91.8% and 94.1%, respectively. The PPV for PET/CT was 95.1%, and for US, the PPV was 94.1%. No significant difference in sensitivity or accuracy was shown between PET/CT and US for the diagnosis of metastatic axillary nodal disease. Three of 85 cases showed discordance between negative PET/CT and positive US and fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33186270      PMCID: PMC7933074          DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Q        ISSN: 0894-8771            Impact factor:   1.462


  23 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up after primary treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  G H Sakorafas; A G Tsiotou; G Pavlakis
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Savitri Krishnamurthy; Nour Sneige; Deepak G Bedi; Beth S Edieken; Bruno D Fornage; Henry M Kuerer; S Eva Singletary; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Proceedings of the consensus conference on the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast, April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Gordon F Schwartz; Armando E Giuliano; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Armando E Giuliano; Mark R Somerfield; Al B Benson; Diane C Bodurka; Harold J Burstein; Alistair J Cochran; Hiram S Cody; Stephen B Edge; Sharon Galper; James A Hayman; Theodore Y Kim; Cheryl L Perkins; Donald A Podoloff; Visa Haran Sivasubramaniam; Roderick R Turner; Richard Wahl; Donald L Weaver; Antonio C Wolff; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  PET/CT: form and function.

Authors:  Todd M Blodgett; Carolyn C Meltzer; David W Townsend
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Evaluation in Breast Cancer: Current Issues and Literature Review.

Authors:  Hee Young Choi; Minho Park; Mirinae Seo; Eunjee Song; So Youn Shin; Yu-Mee Sohn
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.657

7.  Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG).

Authors:  Christoph Tausch; Susanne Taucher; Peter Dubsky; Michael Seifert; Roland Reitsamer; Werner Kwasny; Raimund Jakesz; Florian Fitzal; Lidija Filipcic; Michael Fridrik; Richard Greil; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Patients with breast cancer: differences in color Doppler flow and gray-scale US features of benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes.

Authors:  W T Yang; J Chang; C Metreweli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Stage I Breast Cancer: Initial Workup and Surveillance for Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases in Asymptomatic Women.

Authors:  Alana A Lewin; Linda Moy; Paul Baron; Aarati D Didwania; Roberta M diFlorio-Alexander; Jessica H Hayward; Huong T Le-Petross; Mary S Newell; Amar Rewari; John R Scheel; Ashley R Stuckey; W Warren Suh; Gary A Ulaner; Nina S Vincoff; Susan P Weinstein; Priscilla J Slanetz
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Carolin Riegger; Angela Koeninger; Verena Hartung; Friedrich Otterbach; Rainer Kimmig; Michael Forsting; Andreas Bockisch; Gerald Antoch; Till A Heusner
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 1.990

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.