Literature DB >> 12209680

Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.

Savitri Krishnamurthy1, Nour Sneige, Deepak G Bedi, Beth S Edieken, Bruno D Fornage, Henry M Kuerer, S Eva Singletary, Kelly K Hunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is more sensitive than physical examination alone in determining axillary lymph node involvement during preliminary staging of breast carcinoma. Due to occasional overlap of sonographic features of benign and indeterminate lymph nodes, fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of sonographically indeterminate/suspicious lymph nodes can provide a more definitive diagnosis than US alone. This study was undertaken to determine the diagnostic accuracy of US-guided FNA of indeterminate/suspicious/metastatic-appearing axillary lymph nodes during the initial staging of breast carcinoma.
METHODS: The cytology of 103 cases of US-guided FNA of nonpalpable indeterminate/suspicious/metastatic-appearing lymph nodes was compared with the final histopathologic status of the entire axilla after axillary dissection. The final axillary lymph node status was categorized as either negative when all lymph nodes were negative for metastasis or positive when there was evidence of metastasis in one or more lymph nodes. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and false-negative rate of US-guided FNA of nonpalpable axillary lymph nodes in the preliminary staging process were calculated.
RESULTS: In 51 of 103 cases (49.5%), the US-guided FNA and histopathology were both positive for metastasis. In 24 of 103 cases (23.3%), both were negative. The apparent false-positive FNA in 16 (15.5%) cases was explained by the complete response of the metastatic lymph nodes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the interval between FNA and axillary dissection. In 12 cases (11.6%), US-guided FNA was negative, but metastasis was seen in histologic sections. All cases with three or more lymph nodes with metastatic disease and 93% of those with metastatic deposit measuring more than 0.5 mm were detected by US-guided FNA. The probability of detecting lymph nodes with smaller metastatic deposit measuring less than 0.5 cm was 44%. The overall sensitivity of US-guided FNA was 86.4%, the specificity was 100%, the diagnostic accuracy was 79.0%, the positive predictive value was 100%, and the negative predictive value was 67%.
CONCLUSIONS: US-guided FNA of nonpalpable indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes is a simple, minimally invasive, and reliable technique for the initial determination of axillary lymph node status in breast carcinoma. The common causes of discrepancy between the initial and final axillary lymph node status include failure to visualize all lymph nodes during US examination, small-sized metastases, and preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12209680     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  64 in total

1.  [Non-invasive imaging modalities for preoperative axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer].

Authors:  K Wasser; A Schnitzer; J Brade; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Differential diagnosis of axillary inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes in rabbit models by using diffusion-weighted imaging: compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Junping Wang; Qian Liao; Yunting Zhang; Chunshui Yu; Renju Bai; Haoran Sun
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Noninvasive photoacoustic identification of sentinel lymph nodes containing methylene blue in vivo in a rat model.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Song; Erich W Stein; Julie A Margenthaler; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Usefulness of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging with a dedicated axillary sequence for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Hye Shin Ahn; Mijung Jang; Sun Mi Kim; Bo La Yun; Soo Hyun Lee
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Axillary lymph node echo-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology enables breast cancer patients to avoid a sentinel lymph node biopsy. Preliminary experience and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Vittorio Altomare; Gabriella Guerriero; Rita Carino; Cleonice Battista; Angelo Primavera; Annamaria Altomare; Donata Vaccaro; Alessandro Esposito; Anna Maria Ferri; Carla Rabitti
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Predictive value of fine needle aspiration biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in preoperative breast cancer staging.

Authors:  Muzaffer Akıncı; Serap Pamak Bulut; Fazilet Erözgen; Mihriban Gürbüzel; Gökçe Gülşen; Ahmet Kocakuşak; Mehmet Gülen; Rafet Kaplan
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

7.  The safety and efficiency of the ultrasound-guided large needle core biopsy of axilla lymph nodes.

Authors:  Ki Hong Kim; Eun Ju Son; Eun-Kyung Kim; Kyung Hee Ko; Haeyoun Kang; Ki Keun Oh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Residual nodal disease in biopsy proven n1/n2 breast cancer following neoadjuvant systemic therapy.

Authors:  Fatema Al Mushawah; Marcus C Tan; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Feasibility of fine-needle aspiration for assessing responses to chemotherapy in metastatic nodes marked with clips in breast cancer: A prospective registry study.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Henry M Kuerer; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Kyungmin Shin; Brian P Hobbs; Junsheng Ma; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Ashley C Washington; Sarah M DeSnyder; Dalliah M Black; Kelly K Hunt; Wei T Yang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011: impact on surgeon practice patterns.

Authors:  Abigail S Caudle; Kelly K Hunt; Susan L Tucker; Karen Hoffman; Sarah M Gainer; Anthony Lucci; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ruchita Shah; Gildy V Babiera; Aysegul A Sahin; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.