Literature DB >> 22207051

Prognostic value of number of removed lymph nodes, number of involved lymph nodes, and lymph node ratio in 7502 breast cancer patients enrolled onto trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG).

Christoph Tausch1, Susanne Taucher, Peter Dubsky, Michael Seifert, Roland Reitsamer, Werner Kwasny, Raimund Jakesz, Florian Fitzal, Lidija Filipcic, Michael Fridrik, Richard Greil, Michael Gnant.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The number of removed axillary lymph nodes and the ratio of involved to removed lymph nodes are described as independent prognostic factors beside the absolute number of involved lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. The correlation between these factors and prognosis were investigated in trials of the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG).
METHODS: This retrospective analysis is based on the data of 7052 patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer who were randomized in four trials of the ABCSG in the years 1990-2006 and underwent axillary lymph node dissection. The prognostic value of number of removed nodes (NRN), number of involved nodes (NIN), and ratio of involved to removed nodes (lymph node ratio, LNR) concerning recurrence-free survival and overall survival was analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 2718 patients had node-positive disease. No correlation was found between NRN and prognosis. Increasing NIN and LNR were significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and overall survival in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < .001). Only in the subgroup of patients with one to three positive lymph nodes and treated with mastectomy (n = 728) was LNR an additional prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: For breast cancer patients stringently medicated in the framework of prospective adjuvant clinical trials and requiring a mandatory minimum of removed nodes, NRN does not influence prognosis, and LNR is not superior to NIN as prognostic factor. In patients with one to three positive lymph nodes and mastectomy, LNR could play a role as an additional prognostic factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22207051     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2189-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  21 in total

1.  Preparing for prospective clinical trials: a national initiative of an excellence registry for consecutive pancreatic cancer resections.

Authors:  Odo Gangl; Klaus Sahora; Peter Kornprat; Christian Margreiter; Florian Primavesi; Evelyne Bareck; Martin Schindl; Friedrich Längle; Dietmar Öfner; Hans-Jörg Mischinger; Johann Pratschke; Michael Gnant; Reinhold Függer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Staging the axilla in breast cancer patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET: how small are the metastases that we can detect with new generation clinical PET systems?

Authors:  Dimitri Bellevre; Cécile Blanc Fournier; Odile Switsers; Audrey Emmanuelle Dugué; Christelle Levy; Djelila Allouache; Cédric Desmonts; Hubert Crouet; Jean-Marc Guilloit; Jean-Michel Grellard; Nicolas Aide
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Number of negative lymph nodes should be considered for incorporation into staging for breast cancer.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Yan Wang; Juan Zhou; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  Consensus on the regional lymph nodes irradiation in breast cancer.

Authors:  E Bayo; I Herruzo; M Arenas; M Algara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Mastectomy alone for pT1-2 pN0-1 breast cancer patients: when postmastectomy radiotherapy is indicated.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Leonardi; Ida Rosalia Scognamiglio; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Giovanni Corso; Patrick Maisonneuve; Samantha Dicuonzo; Damaris Patricia Rojas; Maria Alessia Zerella; Anna Morra; Marianna Alessandra Gerardi; Mattia Zaffaroni; Alessandra De Scalzi; Antonia Girardi; Francesca Magnoni; Emilia Montagna; Cristiana Iuliana Fodor; Viviana Enrica Galimberti; Paolo Veronesi; Roberto Orecchia; Roberto Pacelli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Does the axillary lymph node ratio have any added prognostic value over pN staging for South East Asian breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Nakul Saxena; Mikael Hartman; Cheng-Har Yip; Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy; Lay Wai Khin; Nur Aishah Taib; Lai-Meng Looi; Siew-Eng Lim; Soo-Chin Lee; Helena M Verkooijen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Prognostic value of metastatic axillary lymph node ratio for Chinese breast cancer patients.

Authors:  San-Gang Wu; Zhen-Yu He; Qun Li; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Qin Lin; Huan-Xin Lin; Xun-Xing Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Comparison of the Diagnostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Ultrasound for the Detection of Metastatic Axillary Nodal Disease in Treatment-Naive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Viet T Le; Franklin C Wong; Roland L Bassett; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.462

9.  Lymph Node Ratio (LNR): Predicting Prognosis after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Atilla Soran; Tolga Ozmen; Arsalan Salamat; Gürsel Soybir; Ronald Johnson
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-10-01

10.  Clinical relevance of lymph node ratio in breast cancer patients with one to three positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  S I Kim; S-H Cho; J S Lee; H-G Moon; W C Noh; H J Youn; B K Ko; B-W Park
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.