Literature DB >> 3318305

The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant.

G M Clark1, P J Blamey, A M Brown, P A Gusby, R C Dowell, B K Franz, B C Pyman, R K Shepherd, Y C Tong, R L Webb.   

Abstract

To summarize, our preliminary results indicate that some prelingually deaf patients may get worthwhile help from a multiple-electrode cochlear implant which extracts formants. They can understand words and running speech better when using the cochlear implant with lip-reading compared to lip-reading alone. It has been encouraging that these improvements can occur in young adults and teenagers. It has also been encouraging that some can recognize place pitch as well as rate pitch. There are, however, considerable variations in performance and this may be due to the following factors: whether they have had some hearing after birth, the method of education used, the motivation of the patient and age at implantation. In conclusion it is important to emphasize that deaf children are severely disadvantaged however good their teacher of the deaf. Research on cochlear implants offers hope for profoundly-totally deaf children. These developments will not replace the caring, competent educators but complement their skills. There is also a greater need than ever for an interdisciplinary approach to these children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3318305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  7 in total

Review 1.  The multiple-channel cochlear implant: the interface between sound and the central nervous system for hearing, speech, and language in deaf people-a personal perspective.

Authors:  Graeme M Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

3. 

Authors:  H-G Kempf; A Büchner; T Stöver
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.284

4. 

Authors:  H-G Kempf; A Büchner; T Stöver
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

Review 6.  Fundamental frequency and speech intelligibility in background noise.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Comparison of the In Vitro and In Vivo Electrochemical Performance of Bionic Electrodes.

Authors:  Alexander R Harris; Carrie Newbold; Dimitra Stathopoulos; Paul Carter; Robert Cowan; Gordon G Wallace
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.