Literature DB >> 28271130

H-G Kempf1,2, A Büchner3, T Stöver3.   

Abstract

From the technical point of view, cochlear implant (CI) surgery in adults is a well established procedure. Pre- and postoperative evaluation, surgical approach and rehabilitation programs are standardized, presenting CI as a low risk procedure with rare complications similar to those of middle ear surgery. Modern advanced CI devices offer technical reliability and multiple speech encoding strategies and recently, even small processors which are worn behind the ear. Further technical advances are continuously available, even for implanted patients. Upgrading is usually easy because the outer parts of the implant are exchangeable and software upgrades can be transmitted transcutaneously to the implant. Assuming that medical and rehabilitation requirements are available, there are only very few indications against CI in adults. Candidate patients should therefore be transferred to CI-centres where a decision can be taken depending on presurgical evaluation results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult; Cochlear implant; Complication; Indication; Technique

Year:  2003        PMID: 28271130     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-003-0893-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  35 in total

1.  Safe electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve at the promontory during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Obler; H Köstler; B P Weber; K F Mack; H Becker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  [Where should rehabilitation after cochlear implant management take place? Ambulatory vs. inpatient care].

Authors:  R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  The results in patients implanted with the nucleus double array cochlear implant: pitch discrimination and auditory performance.

Authors:  Th Lenarz; A Büchner; C Tasche; T Cristofoli; A Lesinski-Schiedat; E V Wallenberg; R D Battmer; P A Busby; C Frohne
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [Auditory prosthesis by means of a distant electrical stimulation of the sensory nerve with the use of an indwelt coiling].

Authors:  A DJOURNO; C EYRIES
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1957-08-31       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  B S Wilson; C C Finley; D T Lawson; R D Wolford; D K Eddington; W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  [Ionomer cement in cochlear implant surgery--applications and long-term outcome].

Authors:  H G Kempf; P R Issing; T Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.057

7.  Speech perception abilities of adults using a multichannel cochlear implant and frequency transposition hearing aid.

Authors:  P M Chute; J S Gravel; A L Popp
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

8.  [Cochlear implant in inner ear abnormalities and footplate malformation].

Authors:  B P Weber; T Lenarz; B Dietrich; W Dillo
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.057

9.  [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].

Authors:  T Lenarz; B P Weber; P R Issing; D Gnadeberg; K Ambjørnsen; K F Mack; M Winter
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.057

10.  Facial nerve stimulation produced by cochlear implants in patients with cochlear otosclerosis.

Authors:  R P Muckle; S C Levine
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1994-05
View more
  6 in total

1.  [Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible?].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; A Aschendorff; I Arapakis; G J Ridder; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [A multicentre comparative study of the ESPrit and the Nucleus 22].

Authors:  K Berger; H Bagus; H Michels; J Roth; B Voss; T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3. 

Authors:  H-G Kempf; A Büchner; T Stöver
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Postoperative legal disputes involving patients with cochlear implants].

Authors:  A Lottner; H Iro; A Schützenberger; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Quality of life and vertigo after bilateral cochlear implantation : Questionnaires as tools for quality assurance].

Authors:  T Rader; M Haerterich; B P Ernst; T Stöver; S Strieth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  [Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S Haumann; R Mühler; M Ziese; H von Specht
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.284

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.