| Literature DB >> 33178282 |
Abeer Babiker Idris1, Hadeel Gassim Hassan1, Maryam Atif Salaheldin Ali1, Sulafa Mohamed Eltaher2, Leena Babiker Idris3, Hisham N Altayb4, Amin Mohamed Abass5, Mustafa Mohammed Ahmed Ibrahim6, El-Amin Mohamed Ibrahim1, Mohamed A Hassan7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is ubiquitous among humans and one of the best-studied examples of an intimate association between bacteria and humans. Phylogeny and Phylogeography of H. pylori strains are known to mirror human migration patterns and reflect significant demographic events in human prehistory. In this study, we analyzed the molecular evolution of H. pylori strains detected from different tribes and regions of Sudan using 16S rRNA gene and the phylogenetic approach. Materials and methods. A total of 75 gastric biopsies were taken from patients who had been referred for endoscopy from different regions of Sudan. The DNA extraction was performed by using the guanidine chloride method. Two sets of primers (universal and specific for H. pylori) were used to amplify the 16S ribosomal gene. Sanger sequencing was applied, and the resulted sequences were matched with the sequences of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database. The evolutionary aspects were analyzed using MEGA7 software.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33178282 PMCID: PMC7609147 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8825718
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Microbiol
Sociodemographic characteristic of patients.
| Variables | Total |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) ± std. deviation (range) | 45.11 ± 17.45 (15–85) | 41.39 ± 17.57 (15–85) | 47.32 ± 17.18 (21–80) | 0.1170 | |
| Gender | Male | 41 (54.67%) | 15 (53.57%) | 26 (55.32%) | 1.0000 |
| Female | 34 (45.33%) | 13 (46.43%) | 21 (44.68%) | ||
| Residence | Urban | 42 (56%) | 15 (53.57%) | 27 (57.45%) | 0.8122 |
| Rural | 33 (44%) | 13 (46.43%) | 20 (42.55%) | ||
| Hospital | Public | 51 (68%) | 20 (71.43%) | 31 (65.96%) | 0.7986 |
| Private | 24 (32%) | 8 (28.57%) | 16 (34.04%) | ||
| History of previous infection | Yes | 42 (56%) | 15 (53.57%) | 27 (57.45%) | 0.8122 |
| No | 33 (44%) | 13 (46.43%) | 20 (42.55%) | ||
| The frequency of recurrence (if yes | One time | 32 (76.19%) | 10 (66.67%) | 22 (81.49%) | 0.4508 |
| More than one time | 10 (23.81%) | 5 (33.3%) | 5 (18.52%) | ||
| Family history of infection | Yes | 36 (48%) | 15 (53.58%) | 21 (44.68%) | 0.4833 |
| No | 39 (52%) | 13 (46.43%) | 26 (55.32%) | ||
| Smoking | Yes | 16 (21.33%) | 5 (17.86%) | 11 (23.4%) | 0.7718 |
| No | 59 (78.67%) | 23 (82.14%) | 36 (76.6%) | ||
| Tribe | Shagia | 10 (13.33%) | 4 (14.29%) | 6 (12.77%) | 0.5733 |
| Jalyeen | 9 (12%) | 4 (14.29%) | 5 (10.64%) | ||
| Mahas | 8 (10.67%) | 3 (10.71%) | 5 (10.64%) | ||
| Rezaigat | 4 (5.33%) | 1 (3.57%) | 3 (6.38%) | ||
| Zaghawa | 4 (5.33%) | 3 (10.71%) | 1 (2.13%) | ||
| Kawahla | 4 (5.33%) | 2 (7.14%) | 2 (4.26%) | ||
| Masalamyia | 3 (4%) | 2 (7.14%) | 1 (2.13%) | ||
| Other | 33 (44%) | 9 (32.14%) | 24 (51.06%) | ||
| Region | Northern Sudan | 15 (20%) | 6 (21.43%) | 9 (19.15%) | 0.2697 |
| Central Sudan | 31 (41.33) | 12 (42.86%) | 19 (40.43%) | ||
| Eastern Sudan | 3 (4%) | 2 (7.14%) | 1 (2.13%) | ||
| Western Sudan | 12 (16%) | 6 (21.43%) | 6 (12.77%) | ||
| Southern Sudan | 14 (18.67%) | 2 (7.14%) | 12 (25.53%) | ||
Distribution of participants according to endoscopy series and status of H. pylori infection.
| Endoscopy results | No. (%) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal gastric findings | 9 (12%) | 4 (14.29%) | 5 (10.64%) | 0.5259 |
| Esophagitis | 4 (5.33%) | 3 (10.71%) | 1 (2.13%) | |
| Esophageal varices | 6 (8%) | 1 (3.57%) | 5 (10.64%) | |
| Gastritis | 26 (34.67%) | 8 (28.57%) | 18 (38.3%) | |
| Duodenitis | 6 (8%) | 3 (10.71%) | 3 (6.38%) | |
| Peptic ulcer | 6 (8%) | 3 (10.71%) | 3 (6.38%) | |
| Cancer | 18 (24%) | 6 (21.43%) | 12 (25.53%) | |
| Total | 75 (100%) | 28 (37.33%) | 47 (62.67%) |
Figure 1(a) and (b) PCR amplification results of universal and specific H. pylori 16S rRNA gene, respectively, examined on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. (c) Sequencing result of Acinetobacter radioresistens chromatogram using Finch TV software. The nucleotide sequence was deposited in the GenBank database under the accession number MN845952.
Description of Sudanese H. pylori strains.
| Strain | Age of the patient (in range) | Clinical origin | Ethnic origin | Province | Region | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strain 12 | [ | Antral gastritis | Rezaigat | Eastern Darfur | West of Sudan | MN845953 |
| Strain 17 | [ | Distal esophagitis and antral gastritis | Halawyeen | Khartoum | Middle of Sudan | MN845187 |
| Strain 21 | [ | Antral gastritis | Kawahla | Sinnar | Southeast of Sudan | MN845181 |
| Strain 23 | [ | GRED | Manaseer | Kartoum | Middle of Sudan | MN845188 |
| Strain 39 | [ | Antral gastritis | Masalamyia | Eastern Darfur | West of Sudan | MN845189 |
| Strain 40 | >60 | Duodenitis | — | Khartoum | Middle of Sudan | MN845182 |
| Strain 44 | [ | Normal gastric finding | Jalyeen | Khartoum | Middle of Sudan | MN845183 |
| Strain 46 | [ | Duodenitis | Shagia | Northern State | North of Sudan | MN845184 |
| Strain 47 | [ | GRED | Shagia | Northern State | North of Sudan | MN845954 |
| Strain 59 | [ | Normal gastric finding | Shagia | Northern State | North of Sudan | MN845190 |
| Strain 101 | [ | Gastric cancer | Zaghawa | North Kordofan | South of Sudan | MN845185 |
| Strain 102 | [ | Gastric cancer | Zaghawa | Northern Darfur | East of Sudan | MN845186 |
Figure 2(a) and (c) Sequencing results of chromatograms using Finch TV software show nucleotide variations in the 16S rRNA gene of H. pylori illustrated by squares. (b) Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) of 16S rRNA sequences of 12 Sudanese H. pylori strains compared with the rrnA gene of H. pylori strain 26695 (NC_000915) and other selected strains obtained from GenBank databases using Clustal W2.
Figure 3Distribution and evolutionary relationships of Sudanese H. pylori strains. (a) Map of the regional origin of strains in Sudan. (b) The Neighbor-Joining Phylogenetic tree. The percentage of replicate trees (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. The evolutionary distance was computed using the JC method and is in the units of the number of base substitution per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted using MEGA7.