Literature DB >> 26211882

Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis.

Kemal Ozgur1, Murat Berkkanoglu2, Hasan Bulut2, Peter Humaidan3, Kevin Coetzee2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the possible effect of controlled ovarian stimulation on the perinatal outcomes of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies, by comparing the outcomes from fresh ET with frozen ET (FET) with blastocysts of similar quality.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
SETTING: Private fertility center. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred eighty-four fresh transfers and 382 vitrified-warmed double blastocyst transfers. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Miscarriage, perinatal mortality, preterm delivery, live birth, live-birth weights, and gestational age of live births. RESULT(S): FET resulted in higher implantation rates (51.5% vs. 40.6%), higher live-birth rates per transfer (56.8% vs. 44.3%), and lower ectopic pregnancy rates (0.32% vs. 1.80%). FET pregnancies also had higher day 14 βhCG levels per implantation (148.2 vs. 176.2 IU/L) and higher infant birth weights (singletons Δ109.4 g, twins Δ124 g). Female infants benefitted the most in terms of birth weight. Miscarriage, premature delivery, perinatal morbidity, and live birth per pregnancy were all nonsignificantly different between fresh ET and FET. CONCLUSION(S): Clinically significant differences between the peri-implantation and perinatal outcomes of fresh ET and FET suggest better endometrial receptivity and placentation in FET cycles.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COS; HRT-FET; blastocysts; fresh ET; perinatal outcomes; pregnancy; vitrification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26211882     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  20 in total

1.  Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Sub-endometrial contractility or computer-enhanced 3-D modeling scoring of the endometrium before embryo transfer: are they better than measuring endometrial thickness?

Authors:  Nivin Samara; Robert F Casper; Rawad Bassil; Mahvash Shere; Eran Barzilay; Raoul Orvieto; Jigal Haas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy rates after pre-implantation genetic screening for aneuploidy are only superior when trophectoderm biopsy is performed on hatching embryos.

Authors:  Sonali Singh; Elie Hobeika; Eric S Knochenhauer; Michael L Traub
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Effect of Embryo Developmental Stage, Morphological Grading, and Ploidy Status on Live Birth Rate in Frozen Cycles of Single Blastocyst Transfer.

Authors:  Hui Ji; Yuxi Zhou; Shanren Cao; Junqiang Zhang; Xiufeng Ling; Chun Zhao; Rong Shen
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 5.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  MeiFang Zeng; SuQin Su; LiuMing Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Frozen embryo transfer can be performed in the cycle immediately following the freeze-all cycle.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Hasan Bulut; Murat Berkkanoglu; Peter Humaidan; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Effect of frozen/thawed embryo transfer on birthweight, macrosomia, and low birthweight rates in US singleton infants.

Authors:  Julia F Litzky; Sheree L Boulet; Navid Esfandiari; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Regan N Theiler; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 8.  Epigenetic changes and assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Sneha Mani; Jayashri Ghosh; Christos Coutifaris; Carmen Sapienza; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 4.528

9.  Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer?

Authors:  Rawad Bassil; Robert Casper; Nivin Samara; Tzu-Bou Hsieh; Eran Barzilay; Raoul Orvieto; Jigal Haas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Single best euploid versus single best unknown-ploidy blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Gonul Didem Akay Yoruk; Nevrah Nal Candurmaz; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.