Literature DB >> 26635337

Positron Emission Mammography Image Interpretation for Reduced Image Count Levels.

Lawrence R MacDonald1, Daniel S Hippe2, Leila C Bender3, Elizabeth W Cotter3, Pooja R Voria3, Paula S Hallam3, Carolyn L Wang4, David R Haseley3, Mary M Kelly3, Jay R Parikh3, J David Beatty3, James V Rogers3.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We studied the effects of reduced (18)F-FDG injection activity on interpretation of positron emission mammography (PEM) images and compared image interpretation between 2 postinjection imaging times.
METHODS: We performed a receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) study using PEM images reconstructed with different count levels expected from injected activities between 23 and 185 MBq. Thirty patients received 2 PEM scans at postinjection times of 60 and 120 min. Half of the patients were scanned with a standard protocol; the others received one-half of the standard activity. Images were reconstructed using 100%, 50%, and 25% of the total counts acquired. Eight radiologists used a 5-point confidence scale to score 232 PEM images for the presence of up to 3 malignant lesions. Paired images were analyzed with conditional logistic regression and ROC analysis to investigate changes in interpretation.
RESULTS: There was a trend for increasing lesion detection sensitivity with increased image counts: odds ratios were 2.2 (P = 0.01) and 1.9 (P = 0.04) per doubling of image counts for 60- and 120-min uptake images, respectively, without significant difference between time points (P = 0.7). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was highest for the 100%-count, 60-min images (0.83 vs. 0.75 for 50%-counts, P = 0.02). The 120-min images had a similar trend but did not reach statistical significance (AUC = 0.79 vs. 0.73, P = 0.1). Our data did not yield significant trends between specificity and image counts. Lesion-to-background ratios increased between 60- and 120-min scans (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Reducing the image counts relative to the standard protocol decreased diagnostic accuracy. The increase in lesion-to-background ratio between 60- and 120-min uptake times was not enough to improve detection sensitivity in this study, perhaps in part due to fewer counts in the later scan.
© 2016 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  free-response ROC; injected activity; low-dose PET; positron emission mammography (PEM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26635337     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.165787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  4 in total

Review 1.  Use of Breast-Specific PET Scanners and Comparison with MR Imaging.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Impact of Using Uniform Attenuation Coefficients for Heterogeneously Dense Breasts in a Dedicated Breast PET/X-ray Scanner.

Authors:  Lawrence R MacDonald; Joseph Y Lo; Gregory M Sturgeon; Chengeng Zeng; Robert L Harrison; Paul E Kinahan; William Paul Segars
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 3.  Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-07

4.  Evaluation of a High-Sensitivity Organ-Targeted PET Camera.

Authors:  Justin Stiles; Brandon Baldassi; Oleksandr Bubon; Harutyun Poladyan; Vivianne Freitas; Anabel Scaranelo; Anna Marie Mulligan; Michael Waterston; Alla Reznik
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.847

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.