| Literature DB >> 33154428 |
Catarina C Coelho1,2,3,4, Tatiana Padrão5,6,7, Laura Costa5,6,8, Marta T Pinto5,9, Paulo C Costa10, Valentina F Domingues11, Paulo A Quadros12, Fernando J Monteiro5,6,8, Susana R Sousa5,6,7.
Abstract
Bone graft infections are serious complications in orthopaedics and the growing resistance to antibiotics is increasing the need for antibacterial strategies. The use of magnesium oxide (MgO) is an interesting alternative since it possesses broad-spectrum antibacterial activity. Additionally, magnesium ions also play a role in bone regeneration, which makes MgO more appealing than other metal oxides. Therefore, a bone substitute composed of hydroxyapatite and MgO (HAp/MgO) spherical granules was developed using different sintering heat-treatment cycles to optimize its features. Depending on the sintering temperature, HAp/MgO spherical granules exhibited distinct surface topographies, mechanical strength and degradation profiles, that influenced the in vitro antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility. A proper balance between antibacterial activity and cytocompatibility was achieved with HAp/MgO spherical granules sintered at 1100 ºC. The presence of MgO in these granules was able to significantly reduce bacterial proliferation and simultaneously provide a suitable environment for osteoblasts growth. The angiogenic and inflammation potentials were also assessed using the in vivo chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model and the spherical granules containing MgO stimulated angiogenesis without increasing inflammation. The outcomes of this study evidence a dual effect of MgO for bone regenerative applications making this material a promising antibacterial bone substitute.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33154428 PMCID: PMC7645747 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76063-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Morphology and surface of the spherical granules. (A) Macroscopic view of the spherical granules; (B) General view of the granules acquired with SEM evidencing their spherical morphology and size; and (C) SEM images showing the surface details of HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules sintered at 900, 1100 and 1300 °C. Arrows point out the MgO particles enclosed in the middle of the HAp ones.
Figure 2XRD spectra obtained for HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules sintered at 1100 °C. *Represents a peak at 43° that corresponds to MgO.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules sintered at 900, 1100 and 1300 °C. * Indicates the vibration of Mg-O.
Figure 4Mechanical properties of the HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules. (A) Force–time curves obtained for each material and compressive strength calculated from the parameters obtained by force–time curves; (B) Friability results expressed in terms of weight loss.
Figure 5Chemical degradation and biodegradation assays performed with HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules for 28 days. A) Mg2+ release, pH variation and weight loss over time for the different materials; B) SEM images illustrating apatite formation on granules surface after 28 days of immersion in SBF (black arrows) (Scale bar = 2 µm; 50,000 × magnification).
Figure 6Antibacterial activity of the HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules. A) Planktonic growth after 24 h incubation with the spherical granules; B) Initial bacterial adhesion onto the surface after 1 h incubation with the spherical granules. ****Indicates a statistical significant difference (p < 0.0001).
Figure 7Cytocompatibility assay with MC3T3-E1 cells cultured with HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules. (A) Metabolic activity of the MC3T3-E1 cells after 3, 7 and 14 days of culture. TCPS were used as a control (data not shown); (B) SEM images of the cells adhered on the materials, with a general view of the materials on the left side and a detailed of the surface on the right side. ****Indicates a statistical significant difference (p < 0.0001).
Figure 8In vivo CAM assay performed with HAp and HAp/MgO spherical granules sintered at 1100 and 1300 °C. (A) Representative images used to determine the angiogenic response of the materials and the quantification of neovessels; (B) Inflammation score analysis made on macroscopic images of excised CAMs [Score 0 = no inflammatory reaction. Score 1 = with inflammatory reaction. Score 2 = with inflammatory reaction, bigger than the counterpart (in the same egg)]. Histological images of the CAM stained with H&E validated the inflammation scores, with an inflammatory response characterized by dilation of the CAM (Scale bar = 100 µm; 10 × magnification). * represents a statistically significant difference with p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 and ****p < 0.0001.