Shelley S Magill1, Jonathan R Edwards, Wendy Bamberg, Zintars G Beldavs, Ghinwa Dumyati, Marion A Kainer, Ruth Lynfield, Meghan Maloney, Laura McAllister-Hollod, Joelle Nadle, Susan M Ray, Deborah L Thompson, Lucy E Wilson, Scott K Fridkin. 1. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (S.S.M., J.R.E., L.M.-H., S.K.F.) and Emory University School of Medicine (S.M.R.) - both in Atlanta; Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver (W.B.); Oregon Public Health Authority, Portland (Z.G.B.); New York-Rochester Emerging Infections Program and University of Rochester, Rochester (G.D.); Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville (M.A.K.); Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul (R.L.); Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford (M.M.); California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland (J.N.); Georgia Emerging Infections Program and the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur (S.M.R.); New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe (D.L.T.); and Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Baltimore (L.E.W.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, no single U.S. surveillance system can provide estimates of the burden of all types of health care-associated infections across acute care patient populations. We conducted a prevalence survey in 10 geographically diverse states to determine the prevalence of health care-associated infections in acute care hospitals and generate updated estimates of the national burden of such infections. METHODS: We defined health care-associated infections with the use of National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. One-day surveys of randomly selected inpatients were performed in participating hospitals. Hospital personnel collected demographic and limited clinical data. Trained data collectors reviewed medical records retrospectively to identify health care-associated infections active at the time of the survey. Survey data and 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data, stratified according to patient age and length of hospital stay, were used to estimate the total numbers of health care-associated infections and of inpatients with such infections in U.S. acute care hospitals in 2011. RESULTS: Surveys were conducted in 183 hospitals. Of 11,282 patients, 452 had 1 or more health care-associated infections (4.0%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 4.4). Of 504 such infections, the most common types were pneumonia (21.8%), surgical-site infections (21.8%), and gastrointestinal infections (17.1%). Clostridium difficile was the most commonly reported pathogen (causing 12.1% of health care-associated infections). Device-associated infections (i.e., central-catheter-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia), which have traditionally been the focus of programs to prevent health care-associated infections, accounted for 25.6% of such infections. We estimated that there were 648,000 patients with 721,800 health care-associated infections in U.S. acute care hospitals in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this multistate prevalence survey of health care-associated infections indicate that public health surveillance and prevention activities should continue to address C. difficile infections. As device- and procedure-associated infections decrease, consideration should be given to expanding surveillance and prevention activities to include other health care-associated infections.
BACKGROUND: Currently, no single U.S. surveillance system can provide estimates of the burden of all types of health care-associated infections across acute care patient populations. We conducted a prevalence survey in 10 geographically diverse states to determine the prevalence of health care-associated infections in acute care hospitals and generate updated estimates of the national burden of such infections. METHODS: We defined health care-associated infections with the use of National Healthcare Safety Network criteria. One-day surveys of randomly selected inpatients were performed in participating hospitals. Hospital personnel collected demographic and limited clinical data. Trained data collectors reviewed medical records retrospectively to identify health care-associated infections active at the time of the survey. Survey data and 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data, stratified according to patient age and length of hospital stay, were used to estimate the total numbers of health care-associated infections and of inpatients with such infections in U.S. acute care hospitals in 2011. RESULTS: Surveys were conducted in 183 hospitals. Of 11,282 patients, 452 had 1 or more health care-associated infections (4.0%; 95% confidence interval, 3.7 to 4.4). Of 504 such infections, the most common types were pneumonia (21.8%), surgical-site infections (21.8%), and gastrointestinal infections (17.1%). Clostridium difficile was the most commonly reported pathogen (causing 12.1% of health care-associated infections). Device-associated infections (i.e., central-catheter-associated bloodstream infection, catheter-associated urinary tract infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia), which have traditionally been the focus of programs to prevent health care-associated infections, accounted for 25.6% of such infections. We estimated that there were 648,000 patients with 721,800 health care-associated infections in U.S. acute care hospitals in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this multistate prevalence survey of health care-associated infections indicate that public health surveillance and prevention activities should continue to address C. difficile infections. As device- and procedure-associated infections decrease, consideration should be given to expanding surveillance and prevention activities to include other health care-associated infections.
Authors: D Gravel; G Taylor; M Ofner; L Johnston; M Loeb; V R Roth; J Stegenga; E Bryce; Anne Matlow Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Jill A Marsteller; J Bryan Sexton; Yea-Jen Hsu; Chun-Ju Hsiao; Christine G Holzmueller; Peter J Pronovost; David A Thompson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Erik R Dubberke; Anne M Butler; Humaa A Nyazee; Kimberly A Reske; Deborah S Yokoe; Jeanmarie Mayer; Julie E Mangino; Yosef M Khan; Victoria J Fraser Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Denise Gravel; Anne Matlow; Marianna Ofner-Agostini; Mark Loeb; Lynn Johnston; Elizabeth Bryce; Mary Lu Sample; Virginia R Roth; Carol Goldman; Geoff Taylor Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: R Monina Klevens; Jonathan R Edwards; Chesley L Richards; Teresa C Horan; Robert P Gaynes; Daniel A Pollock; Denise M Cardo Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Katherine L Kahn; Peter Mendel; Daniel A Weinberg; Kristin J Leuschner; Elizabeth M Gall; Sari Siegel Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Marc Zerey; B Lauren Paton; Amy E Lincourt; Keith S Gersin; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: David M Faleck; Hojjat Salmasian; E Yoko Furuya; Elaine L Larson; Julian A Abrams; Daniel E Freedberg Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Lauren S Tufts; Emma D Jarnagin; Jessica R Flynn; Mithat Gonen; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Garrett M Nash; Joshua J Smith; Iris H Wei; Emmanouil Pappou; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; T Peter Kingham; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; William R Jarnagin; Martin R Weiser Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 3.647