Literature DB >> 16188545

Bone substitutes: an update.

Peter V Giannoudis1, Haralambos Dinopoulos, Eleftherios Tsiridis.   

Abstract

Autograft is considered ideal for grafting procedures, providing osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and an osteoconductive scaffold. Limitations, however, exist regarding donor site morbidity and graft availability. Allograft on the other hand, posses the risk of disease transmission. Synthetic graft substitutes lack osteoinductive or osteogenic properties. Composite grafts combine scaffolding properties with biological elements to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation and eventually osteogenesis. We present here an overview of bone grafts and graft substitutes available for clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16188545     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  400 in total

1.  Comparing variable-length polyglutamate domains to anchor an osteoinductive collagen-mimetic peptide to diverse bone grafting materials.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bain; Bonnie K Culpepper; Michael S Reddy; Susan L Bellis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  [Platelet-rich plasma combined with autologous cancellous bone : An alternative therapy for persistent non-union?].

Authors:  M Hakimi; P Jungbluth; S Thelen; M Betsch; W Linhart; S Flohé; J Windolf; M Wild
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The bio-functional role of calcium in mesoporous silica xerogels on the responses of osteoblasts in vitro.

Authors:  Huanjun Zhou; Jie Wei; Xiaohui Wu; Jianlin Shi; Changsheng Liu; Junfeng Jia; Chenglong Dai; Qi Gan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells synergistically enhanced by biomimetic peptide amphiphiles combined with conditioned medium.

Authors:  Joel M Anderson; Jeremy B Vines; Jessica L Patterson; Haiyan Chen; Amjad Javed; Ho-Wook Jun
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  3D fibre deposition and stereolithography techniques for the design of multifunctional nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds.

Authors:  Roberto De Santis; Ugo D'Amora; Teresa Russo; Alfredo Ronca; Antonio Gloria; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Adipose mesenchymal stem cells in the field of bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Cecilia Romagnoli; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Local protective effects of oral 45S5 bioactive glass on gastric ulcers in experimental animals.

Authors:  Ai-niu Ma; Nian Gong; Jin-miao Lu; Jin-lu Huang; Bin Hao; Yang Guo; Jipin Zhong; Yuhong Xu; Jiang Chang; Yong-xiang Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Bone regeneration with low dose BMP-2 amplified by biomimetic supramolecular nanofibers within collagen scaffolds.

Authors:  Sungsoo S Lee; Brian J Huang; Stuart R Kaltz; Shantanu Sur; Christina J Newcomb; Stuart R Stock; Ramille N Shah; Samuel I Stupp
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Drug delivery using composite scaffolds in the context of bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Cecilia Romagnoli; Federica D'Asta; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-09

10.  Non-invasive diffuse correlation tomography reveals spatial and temporal blood flow differences in murine bone grafting approaches.

Authors:  Songfeng Han; Ashley R Proctor; Joseph B Vella; Danielle S W Benoit; Regine Choe
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.732

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.