Literature DB >> 33151643

Quantitative analysis of treatments using real-time image gated spot-scanning with synchrotron-based proton beam therapy system log data.

Takaaki Yoshimura1,2, Shinichi Shimizu3,4, Takayuki Hashimoto3, Kentaro Nishioka3, Norio Katoh4,5, Hiroshi Taguchi4,5, Koichi Yasuda4,5, Taeko Matsuura6, Seishin Takao2, Masaya Tamura2, Sodai Tanaka6, Yoichi M Ito7, Yuto Matsuo2, Hiroshi Tamura2, Kenji Horita2, Kikuo Umegaki6, Hiroki Shirato4,8.   

Abstract

A synchrotron-based real-time image gated spot-scanning proton beam therapy (RGPT) system with inserted fiducial markers can irradiate a moving tumor with high accuracy. As gated treatments increase the beam delivery time, this study aimed to investigate the frequency of intra-field adjustments corresponding to the baseline shift or drift and the beam delivery efficiency of a synchrotron-based RGPT system. Data from 118 patients corresponding to 127 treatment plans and 2810 sessions between October 2016 and March 2019 were collected. We quantitatively analyzed the proton beam delivery time, the difference between the ideal beam delivery time based on a simulated synchrotron magnetic excitation pattern and the actual treatment beam delivery time, frequency corresponding to the baseline shift or drift, and the gating efficiency of the synchrotron-based RGPT system according to the proton beam delivery machine log data. The mean actual beam delivery time was 7.1 min, and the simulated beam delivery time in an ideal environment with the same treatment plan was 2.9 min. The average difference between the actual and simulated beam delivery time per session was 4.3 min. The average frequency of intra-field adjustments corresponding to baseline shift or drift and beam delivery efficiency were 21.7% and 61.8%, respectively. Based on our clinical experience with a synchrotron-based RGPT system, we determined the frequency corresponding to baseline shift or drift and the beam delivery efficiency using the beam delivery machine log data. To maintain treatment accuracy within ± 2.0 mm, intra-field adjustments corresponding to baseline shift or drift were required in approximately 20% of cases. Further improvements in beam delivery efficiency may be realized by shortening the beam delivery time.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beam delivery efficiency; organ motion; spot-scanning proton beam therapy; treatment time

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33151643      PMCID: PMC7769392          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  40 in total

1.  Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors.

Authors:  M F Moyers; D W Miller; D A Bush; J D Slater
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Real-time tumour-tracking radiotherapy.

Authors:  H Shirato; S Shimizu; T Shimizu; T Nishioka; K Miyasaka
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Respiratory liver motion estimation and its effect on scanned proton beam therapy.

Authors:  Ye Zhang; D Boye; C Tanner; A J Lomax; A Knopf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Intensity modulated proton therapy and its sensitivity to treatment uncertainties 1: the potential effects of calculational uncertainties.

Authors:  A J Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Reduction of the number of stacking layers in proton uniform scanning.

Authors:  Shinichiro Fujitaka; Taisuke Takayanagi; Rintaro Fujimoto; Yusuke Fujii; Hideaki Nishiuchi; Futaro Ebina; Takashi Okazaki; Kazuo Hiramoto; Takeji Sakae; Toshiyuki Terunuma
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system.

Authors:  Alfred Smith; Michael Gillin; Martin Bues; X Ronald Zhu; Kazumichi Suzuki; Radhe Mohan; Shiao Woo; Andrew Lee; Ritsko Komaki; James Cox; Kazuo Hiramoto; Hiroshi Akiyama; Takayuki Ishida; Toshie Sasaki; Koji Matsuda
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties.

Authors:  Peter C Park; X Ronald Zhu; Andrew K Lee; Narayan Sahoo; Adam D Melancon; Lifei Zhang; Lei Dong
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Integration of a real-time tumor monitoring system into gated proton spot-scanning beam therapy: an initial phantom study using patient tumor trajectory data.

Authors:  Taeko Matsuura; Naoki Miyamoto; Shinichi Shimizu; Yusuke Fujii; Masumi Umezawa; Seishin Takao; Hideaki Nihongi; Chie Toramatsu; Kenneth Sutherland; Ryusuke Suzuki; Masayori Ishikawa; Rumiko Kinoshita; Kenichiro Maeda; Kikuo Umegaki; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Exhale fluctuation in respiratory-gated radiotherapy of the lung: a pitfall of respiratory gating shown in a synchronized internal/external marker recording study.

Authors:  Seiko Nishioka; Takeshi Nishioka; Masaki Kawahara; Shigeru Tanaka; Tadao Hiromura; Kazuo Tomita; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Multiple energy extraction reduces beam delivery time for a synchrotron-based proton spot-scanning system.

Authors:  James E Younkin; Martin Bues; Terence T Sio; Wei Liu; Xiaoning Ding; Sameer R Keole; Joshua B Stoker; Jiajian Shen
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-23
View more
  1 in total

1.  A treatment planning study of urethra-sparing intensity-modulated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takaaki Yoshimura; Kentaro Nishioka; Takayuki Hashimoto; Kazuya Seki; Shouki Kogame; Sodai Tanaka; Takahiro Kanehira; Masaya Tamura; Seishin Takao; Taeko Matsuura; Keiji Kobashi; Fumi Kato; Hidefumi Aoyama; Shinichi Shimizu
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.