Literature DB >> 21703781

A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties.

Peter C Park1, X Ronald Zhu, Andrew K Lee, Narayan Sahoo, Adam D Melancon, Lifei Zhang, Lei Dong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report a method for explicitly designing a planning target volume (PTV) for treatment planning and evaluation in heterogeneous media for passively scattered proton therapy and scanning beam proton therapy using single-field optimization (SFO). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A beam-specific PTV (bsPTV) for proton beams was derived by ray-tracing and shifting ray lines to account for tissue misalignment in the presence of setup error or organ motion. Range uncertainties resulting from inaccuracies in computed tomography-based range estimation were calculated for proximal and distal surfaces of the target in the beam direction. The bsPTV was then constructed based on local heterogeneity. The bsPTV thus can be used directly as a planning target as if it were in photon therapy. To test the robustness of the bsPTV, we generated a single-field proton plan in a virtual phantom. Intentional setup and range errors were introduced. Dose coverage to the clinical target volume (CTV) under various simulation conditions was compared between plans designed based on the bsPTV and a conventional PTV.
RESULTS: The simulated treatment using the bsPTV design performed significantly better than the plan using the conventional PTV in maintaining dose coverage to the CTV. With conventional PTV plans, the minimum coverage to the CTV dropped from 99% to 67% in the presence of setup error, internal motion, and range uncertainty. However, plans using the bsPTV showed minimal drop of target coverage from 99% to 94%.
CONCLUSIONS: The conventional geometry-based PTV concept used in photon therapy does not work well for proton therapy. We investigated and validated a beam-specific PTV method for designing and evaluating proton plans.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21703781      PMCID: PMC3183263          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  20 in total

1.  The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy.

Authors:  M van Herk; P Remeijer; C Rasch; J V Lebesque
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability.

Authors:  J C Stroom; H C de Boer; H Huizenga; A G Visser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  The effect of set-up uncertainties, contour changes, and tissue inhomogeneities on target dose-volume histograms.

Authors:  B C John Cho; Marcel van Herk; Ben J Mijnheer; Harry Bartelink
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Calculation of stopping power ratios for carbon ion dosimetry.

Authors:  Oksana Geithner; P Andreo; N Sobolevsky; G Hartmann; O Jäkel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  U Schneider; E Pedroni; A Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  The precision of proton range calculations in proton radiotherapy treatment planning: experimental verification of the relation between CT-HU and proton stopping power.

Authors:  B Schaffner; E Pedroni
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Urie; M Goitein; M Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Target volume dose considerations in proton beam treatment planning for lung tumors.

Authors:  Martijn Engelsman; Hanne M Kooy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Spot scanning proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: treatment planning technique and analysis of consequences of rotational and translational alignment errors.

Authors:  Jeff Meyer; Jaques Bluett; Richard Amos; Larry Levy; Seungtaek Choi; Quynh-Nhu Nguyen; X Ron Zhu; Michael Gillin; Andrew Lee
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  45 in total

1.  Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Daniel O'Connor; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Min-Yu Tsai; Xun Jia; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Promise and pitfalls of heavy-particle therapy.

Authors:  Timur Mitin; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives.

Authors:  Gyu Sang Yoo; Jeong Il Yu; Hee Chul Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Radhe Mohan; Peter Park; Zhong Liu; Heng Li; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; Richard Wu; Narayan Sahoo; Lei Dong; X Ronald Zhu; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14

5.  Multifield optimization intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck tumors: a translation to practice.

Authors:  Steven J Frank; James D Cox; Michael Gillin; Radhe Mohan; Adam S Garden; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Randal S Weber; Merrill S Kies; Jan S Lewin; Mark F Munsell; Matthew B Palmer; Narayan Sahoo; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Liu; X Ronald Zhu
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Acute toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Koichiro Nakajima; Hiromitsu Iwata; Hiroyuki Ogino; Yukiko Hattori; Shingo Hashimoto; Mikiko Nakanishi; Toshiyuki Toshito; Yukihiro Umemoto; Shoichiro Iwatsuki; Yuta Shibamoto; Jun-Etsu Mizoe
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Practice Patterns Among Radiation Oncologists Treating Pediatric Patients With Proton Craniospinal Irradiation.

Authors:  Sara Medek; Brian De; Luke Pater; John Breneman; Anita Mahajan; Suzanne Wolden; Ralph E Vatner
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-07-04

8.  Robust Planning for a Patient Treated in Decubitus Position with Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Shikui Tang; Limin Song; Jared D Sturgeon; Chang Chang
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-09-20

9.  A novel dose-based positioning method for CT image-guided proton therapy.

Authors:  Joey P Cheung; Peter C Park; Laurence E Court; X Ronald Zhu; Rajat J Kudchadker; Steven J Frank; Lei Dong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Steven J Frank; Xiaoqiang Li; Yupeng Li; Peter C Park; Lei Dong; X Ronald Zhu; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.