Literature DB >> 2459164

Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria.

T K Smith1, A J Hudson, R C Spencer.   

Abstract

Six screening methods for the successful detection of significant bacteriuria--electrical impedance (Malthus), automated acridine-orange staining (Autotrak), particle counting (Ramus), bioluminescence, nitrite and leucocyte test strip (BM Nephur), and microscopy--were evaluated. All had excellent predictive values for a negative result (97%-100%) but were less accurate in predicting a positive result (31%-83%). All methods had high sensitivities (83%-100%) but lower levels of specificity (68%-79%). Bioluminescence was the method with the highest specificity (79%) and the lowest rate of false positive results (15%). It would be inappropriate to decide on treatment and management on the basis of the positive results achieved with any of the methods evaluated, but all methods tested could be used for screening out negative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2459164      PMCID: PMC1141626          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.41.8.904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  21 in total

1.  Particle size distribution analysis for the rapid detection of microbial infection of urine.

Authors:  C S Dow; A D France; M S Khan; T Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Bacterial counts in urine. 1. The reliability of the loop technique.

Authors:  J Haugen; O Strom; B Ostervold
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1968

Review 3.  Automated methods for detection of bacteriuria.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of a urine screening device.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; C A Baum; A C Niles; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Use of leukocyte esterase-nitrate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  D L Smalley; A N Dittmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of bacterial growth by the Malthus conductance meter.

Authors:  N C Baynes; J Comrie; J H Prain
Journal:  Med Lab Sci       Date:  1983-04

7.  Evaluation of the Lumac kit for the detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence.

Authors:  D Mackett; S Kessock-Philip; S Bascomb; C S Easmon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; G L Tan; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid screening for bacteriuria using a particle counter, pulse-height analyser, and computer.

Authors:  M K Alexander; M S Khan; C S Dow
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIA IN LARGE GROUPS OF PATIENTS.

Authors:  D A LEIGH; J D WILLIAMS
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dipstick urinalysis for bacteriuria.

Authors:  J E Coia; G Wills
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Rapid screening for bacteriuria in pregnancy.

Authors:  W Graninger; D Fleischmann; B Schneeweiss; L Aram; F Stockenhuber
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Cost effectiveness of dipsticks.

Authors:  G Harvey; I M Gould
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Evaluation of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for screening urinary tract infection in elderly people.

Authors:  J R Michie; B Thakker; A Bowman; A C McCartney
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evaluation of Clinitek 200 and Rapimat II/T for screening for urinary tract infection.

Authors:  R A Bowman; T V Riley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Laboratory detection of leucocyte esterase and nitrite as an alternative to urine microscopy.

Authors:  B I Batchelor; A R Hunt; I C Bowler; D W Crook
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Two rapid urine screens for detection of bacteriuria: an evaluation.

Authors:  W F Nauschuetz; L S Harrison; S B Trevino; G R Becker; J Benton
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 8.  Controversies in the laboratory diagnosis of community-acquired urinary tract infection.

Authors:  M G Morgan; H McKenzie
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  Complicated catheter-associated urinary tract infections due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis.

Authors:  S M Jacobsen; D J Stickler; H L T Mobley; M E Shirtliff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Routine urinalysis in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  P Hashmi; C Ho; S Morgan; J R Stephenson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.