| Literature DB >> 33143139 |
Felicia Adelina Stanford1,2, Kerstin Voigt1,2,3.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">Iron is a key transition <span class="Chemical">metal required by most microorganisms and is prominently utilised in the transfer of electrons during metabolic reactions. The acquisition of iron is essential and becomes a crucial pathogenic event for opportunistic fungi. Iron is not readily available in the natural environment as it exists in its insoluble ferric form, i.e., in oxides and hydroxides. During infection, the host iron is bound to proteins such as transferrin, ferritin, and haemoglobin. As such, access to iron is one of the major hurdles that fungal pathogens must overcome in an immunocompromised host. Thus, these opportunistic fungi utilise three major iron acquisition systems to overcome this limiting factor for growth and proliferation. To date, numerous iron acquisition pathways have been fully characterised, with key components of these systems having major roles in virulence. Most recently, proteins involved in these pathways have been linked to the development of antifungal resistance. Here, we provide a detailed review of our current knowledge of iron acquisition in opportunistic fungi, and the role iron may have on the development of resistance to antifungals with emphasis on species of the fungal basal lineage order Mucorales, the causative agents of mucormycosis.Entities:
Keywords: Lichtheimia; Mucor; Rhizopus; antifungal resistance; fungal infection; fungal pathogens; metal homeostasis; mucoromycetes; mucoromycotina; zygomycetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33143139 PMCID: PMC7693903 DOI: 10.3390/genes11111296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1General strategies for iron acquisition in pathogenic fungi. (A) the reductive system responsible for iron assimilation via reduction and oxidation followed by transport into the cytoplasm via specialised iron permeases; (B) haem -iron uptake and degradation, which facilitates iron chelation from haemoglobin and haem -proteins; (C) siderophore uptake system that allows for iron acquisition from a spectrum of siderophores and xenosiderophores (figure adapted from [40]).
Reductive iron acquisition system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and pathogenic Mucoralean species.
| Component | Species | Gene | Functions | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferric reductases |
|
| Ferric iron reduction at the cell surface | [ |
| Putative protein—ferric iron reduction at the cell surface | [ | |||
|
| Putative protein—ferric iron reduction at the cell surface | [ | ||
|
| Putative protein—ferric iron reduction at the cell surface | [ | ||
| Multicopper ferroxidase |
|
| Multicopper-oxidase Ferrous iron oxidation and high-affinity uptake coupled with Ftr1 (permease) | [ |
| Putative multicopper oxidase | [ | |||
|
|
| Ferrous iron oxidation and high-affinity iron uptake | [ | |
|
| Putative multicopper oxidase | [ | ||
| Iron permease |
|
| High-affinity iron uptake, coupled with FET3 (multicopper oxidase) | [ |
|
| High affinity iron permease | [ | ||
|
| Putative iron permease | [ | ||
|
| Putative iron permease | [ |
Figure 2Representative structures of the different classes of siderophores: the Hydroxamate class —desferrioxamine B, ferrichrome, ferrichrome A and TAFC; the Catecholate class—enterobactin; and the Carboxylate—rhizoferrin. All structures are illustrated in their iron-free forms.
Components of the siderophore transport system in S. cerevisiae and in pathogenic Mucoralean species.
| Organism | Transporter | Function | Siderophore Substrate | Publication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Arn1 | Ferrichrome and Ferrichrome A transporter | Ferrichrome and Ferrichrome A | [ |
| Arn2/Taf1p | Triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC) transporter | TAFC | [ | |
| Arn3/Sit1p | Ferrichrome and Ferrichrome A transporter | Ferrioxamine B, Ferrichrome A, Ferrichromes, Ferricrocin, Ferrichrycin, Ferrirhodin and Ferrirubin | [ | |
| Arn4p/Enb1p | Enterobactin transporter | Enterobactin | [ | |
| Fob1, Fob2 | Ferrioxamine binding | Ferrioxamine B | [ | |
|
| Fob1 (putative protein) | Ferrioxamine binding | Ferrioxamine B | [ |
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of characterised siderophore transporters from S. cerevisiae (Sc, brown), S. pombe (Sp, pink), C. albicans (Ca, blue), C. neoformans (Cn, red), A. fumigatus (Af, torquoise), and A. nidulans (An, green). Putative siderophore transporters from L. corymbifera (Lc, purple) are also included. CnTri12 is a major facilitator not belonging to the SIT-family of proteins and serves as an outgroup. All sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (v.3.8.31, Marceille, France). Phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the maximum likelihood method implemented in the PhyML program (v3.1/3/0 aLRT, Marceille, France). The WAG substitution model was selected assuming an estimated proportion of invariant sites (0.011) and 4 gamma-distribution rate categories to account for rate heterogeneity across sites. The gamma shape parameters were estimated directly from the data (gamma = 2.830). Reliability for internal branch was assessed using the aLRT test (SH-Like) [127,128,129,130,131,132,133].
Figure 4Schematic organisation of the fungal cell wall of opportunistic fungi. This illustration shows the major components of the cell wall based on current knowledge of the fungal model. Most fungi have chitin, branched β-1,3-glucan and β-1,6-glucan with notable differences in their architecture and attachments to these basal components. In the yeast, C. albicans, there is an inner layer of chitin, followed by a β-1,3- glucan and β-1,6-glucan foundation that anchors glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked (GPI) glycoproteins. In the conidia of A. fumigatus, the basal layer consists of β-1,3- and β-1,4-glucans which are attached to a linear α-1,3 and α-1,6-glucan layer. The mannan chains in A. fumigatus are low molecular weight β-1,5-galactofurans. The cell wall of A. fumigatus conidia possesses a hydrophobic layer known as the hydrophobin rodlet layer and a melanin layer; the hyphae consists of α-1,3-glucans, galactomannan (GM), galactosaminoglycan (GAG) and a few glycosylated proteins (no illustrated). The cell wall of the Basidiomycetous yeast C. neoformans, consists of a β-1,3-glucan and β-1,6-glucan foundation, a mixture of chitin/chitosan. This is followed by the α-1,3 glucans anchor, the capsule outer layer which consists of glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) and galactoxylomannan (GalXM). The precise structure of the Mucorales cell wall is yet to be fully characterised for both the sporangiospores and hyphal form. Illustrated here is the partially known component of the Mucorales sporangiospore. To date, the cell wall has been shown to consist of chitin/chitosan, β-1,3-glucans, mannan, mannose, extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) and other polysaccharides, e.g., mucoran and mucoric acid (hyphae); figure adapted from [170,171].
Techniques used for diagnosis of fungal infections.
| Method | Organism | Comment | Publications | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microscopy | Direct histology and cytology | Gold standard, demonstration of tissue invasion | [ | |
| Cultures | Mycological culture | Slow turn-around time | [ | |
| Blood cultures | Gold standard for candidemia; | [ | ||
| Serological methods | 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG) * | Exceptions: Mucorales and | [ | |
| Galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay * | [ | |||
| Molecular approaches | PCR | - | [ | |
| Imaging technologies | X-rays, CT and CTPA | - | [ | |
| MRI and PET scan | - |
* Fungal cell wall component; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; ITS: internal transcribed spacer region; mtDNA: mitochondrial DNA; CT: computerised tomography; CTPA: CT pulmonary angiography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; PET: positron emission tomography.
Figure 5Azoles and echinocandin antifungal drugs and their mechanism of actions: An illustration of two main classes of antifungal drugs used clinically and how they affect the fungal cell of C. albicans. (A) Echinocandins, e.g., caspofungin, inhibit β-(1-3)-D-glucan synthase in the cell membrane, which leads to disruption in cell wall integrity. (B) Azoles, e.g., fluconazole, inhibit Erg11/CYP51 F5, which blocks the production of ergosterol, leading to the accumulation of toxic sterol intermediates. Δ indicates where iron starvation or depletion may contribute to increased susceptibility to azole antifungals.