| Literature DB >> 33142899 |
Abreha Bayrau Nigusse1,2, Benny Malengier1, Desalegn Alemu Mengistie2,3, Granch Berhe Tseghai1,2,4, Lieva Van Langenhove1.
Abstract
Long-term electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring is very essential for the early detection and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. However, commercially used silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrodes have drawbacks, and these become more obvious during long-term signal monitoring, making them inconvenient for this use. In this study, we developed silver printed textile electrodes from knitted cotton and polyester fabric for ECG monitoring. The surface resistance of printed electrodes was 1.64 Ω/sq for cotton and 1.78 Ω/sq for polyester electrodes. The ECG detection performance of the electrodes was studied by placing three electrodes around the wrist where the electrodes were embedded on an elastic strap with Velcro. The ECG signals collected using textile electrodes had a comparable waveform to those acquired using standard Ag/AgCl electrodes with a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 33.10, 30.17, and 33.52 dB for signals collected from cotton, polyester, and Ag/AgCl electrodes, respectively. The signal quality increased as the tightness of the elastic strap increased. Signals acquired at 15 mmHg pressure level with the textile electrodes provided a similar quality to those acquired using standard electrodes. Interestingly, the textile electrodes gave acceptable signal quality even after ten washing cycles.Entities:
Keywords: ECG; conductive textiles; textile electrodes; washable electrodes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33142899 PMCID: PMC7663435 DOI: 10.3390/s20216233
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Block diagram for screen printing process; (b) Front view of the developed electrode; (c) Component placement setup for ECG measurement.
Figure 2SEM image of (a,c) silver printed cotton fabric and (b,d) silver printed polyester fabric at different resolutions. Insets in the upper right part of (a,b) show the non-printed plain knitted fabrics, while the inset of (c) shows a high magnification of the silver particles on cotton.
Figure 3ECG signals collected using: (a) silver printed cotton; (b) silver printed polyester fabric; and (c) Ag/AgCl gel electrode.
Comparison of signals acquired using textile and gelled electrodes, mean and SD over 25 consecutive cycles.
| Waveforms and Intervals | Electrode Type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Silver Printed Cotton | Silver Printed Polyester | Ag/AgCl | |
| P (mV) | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.01 |
| R-peak amplitude (mV) | 1.28 ± 0.05 | 1.26 ± 0.04 | 1.29 ± 0.05 |
| T (mV) | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.35 ± 03 | 0.35 ± 0.03 |
| PR (ms) | 158 ± 4 | 154 ± 4 | 158 ± 4 |
| QRS (ms) | 93 ± 1 | 93 ± 1 | 93 ± 1 |
| QT (ms) | 346 ± 8 | 336 ± 8 | 348 ± 8 |
| SNR (dB) | 33.10 ± 1.31 | 30.17 ± 1.43 | 33.52 ± 1.30 |
| Hear rate (bpm) | 75 ± 1 | 73 ± 2 | 76 ± 1 |
HR and R-R interval of textile and gelled electrodes of each subject, mean and SD over 25 consecutive cycles.
| Subject | HR (bpm) | R-R Interval (ms) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver Printed Cotton | Silver Printed Polyester | Ag/AgCl | Silver Printed Cotton | Silver Printed Polyester | Ag/AgCl | |
| 1 | 73 | 75 | 76 | 736 ± 18 | 756 ± 20 | 762 ± 16 |
| 2 | 80 | 79 | 79 | 760 ± 23 | 712 ± 40 | 736 ± 16 |
| 3 | 82 | 84 | 82 | 761 ± 27 | 720 ± 27 | 727 ± 39 |
| 4 | 80 | 80 | 82 | 763 ± 20 | 768 ± 28 | 736 ± 20 |
| 5 | 90 | 92 | 93 | 643 ± 12 | 653 ± 14 | 641 ± 15 |
| 6 | 78 | 77 | 77 | 797 ± 49 | 782 ± 53 | 807 ± 45 |
Figure 4ECG signals collected using silver printed cotton electrode at different pressure levels.
Figure 5Boxplot of the R-peak amplitude of signals obtained from silver printed cotton electrodes with different holding pressure, and Ag/AgCl electrode as a control.
Figure 6ECG signals acquired when the body is in motion using different electrodes: (a) silver printed cotton at 15 mmHg; (b) silver printed polyester at 15 mmHg and (c) Ag/AgCl electrodes.
Figure 7(a) Change of surface resistance of silver printed textile electrodes with multiple washing cycles; (b) Effect of stretching on-resistance of printed fabric.
Figure 8ECG signals collected using silver printed cotton and polyester electrode after (a) one washing; (b) five washing and (c) ten washing cycles.
Figure 9ECG signals collected after six months using; (a) silver printed cotton and; (b) polyester electrodes.