Literature DB >> 15792889

Evaluation of commercially available electrodes and gels for recording of slow EEG potentials.

P Tallgren1, S Vanhatalo, K Kaila, J Voipio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the applicability of different types of commercially available electrodes and electrode gels or pastes for recording of slow EEG potentials.
METHODS: Experiments were carried out on six types of reusable electrodes (silver, tin and gold cup electrodes, sintered silver-silver chloride (Ag|AgCl), platinum, stainless steel), six disposable Ag|AgCl electrode models, and nine gels or pastes. We studied the parameters, which are critical in slow-potential recording, such as polarization, initial and long-term stability and low-frequency noise.
RESULTS: The best results were obtained with the reusable sintered Ag|AgCl electrodes. The six disposable Ag|AgCl electrode models also proved to have appropriate electrical properties. Other types of reusable electrodes suffered from diverse degrees of polarization, baseline drift, low-frequency noise, high resistance, and changes in properties due to wear and tear. Seven out of nine gels or pastes contained a significant amount of chloride, which is a prerequisite for DC stability of Ag|AgCl electrodes, whereas the absolute concentration of chloride had little effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct current (DC) coupled recording of EEG is critically dependent on the choice of electrode and gel. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results provide rigorous criteria for choosing DC-stable electrodes and gels for DC-coupled or long time-constant AC-coupled recordings of slow EEG potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15792889     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  49 in total

1.  Preterm EEG: a multimodal neurophysiological protocol.

Authors:  Susanna Stjerna; Juha Voipio; Marjo Metsäranta; Kai Kaila; Sampsa Vanhatalo
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Clearly, Graphene is the New Gold.

Authors:  William Stacey
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.500

3.  Experimental and preliminary clinical evidence of an ischemic zone with prolonged negative DC shifts surrounded by a normally perfused tissue belt with persistent electrocorticographic depression.

Authors:  Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Denny Milakara; Mesbah Alam; Devi Jorks; Sebastian Major; Jed A Hartings; Janos Lückl; Peter Martus; Rudolf Graf; Christian Dohmen; Georg Bohner; Johannes Woitzik; Jens P Dreier
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Infraslow Electroencephalographic and Dynamic Resting State Network Activity.

Authors:  Joshua K Grooms; Garth J Thompson; Wen-Ju Pan; Jacob Billings; Eric H Schumacher; Charles M Epstein; Shella D Keilholz
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2017-06

5.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Brainstem stimulation increases functional connectivity of basal forebrain-paralimbic network in isoflurane-anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Siveshigan Pillay; Xiping Liu; Péter Baracskay; Anthony G Hudetz
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-09

Review 7.  Blending Electronics with the Human Body: A Pathway toward a Cybernetic Future.

Authors:  Mehdi Mehrali; Sara Bagherifard; Mohsen Akbari; Ashish Thakur; Bahram Mirani; Mohammad Mehrali; Masoud Hasany; Gorka Orive; Paramita Das; Jenny Emneus; Thomas L Andresen; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 16.806

8.  Motor cortex stimulation suppresses cortical responses to noxious hindpaw stimulation after spinal cord lesion in rats.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Yadong Ji; Pamela J Voulalas; Michael Keaser; Su Xu; Rao P Gullapalli; Joel Greenspan; Radi Masri
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Infraslow LFP correlates to resting-state fMRI BOLD signals.

Authors:  Wen-Ju Pan; Garth John Thompson; Matthew Evan Magnuson; Dieter Jaeger; Shella Keilholz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.