| Literature DB >> 25120162 |
Jeong Su Lee1, Jeong Heo2, Won Kyu Lee3, Yong Gyu Lim4, Youn Ho Kim5, Kwang Suk Park6.
Abstract
This study proposes the use of flexible capacitive electrodes for reducing motion artifacts in a wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) device. The capacitive electrodes have conductive foam on their surface, a shield, an optimal input bias resistor, and guarding feedback. The electrodes are integrated in a chest belt, and the acquired signals are transmitted wirelessly for ambulatory heart rate monitoring. We experimentally validated the electrode performance with subjects standing and walking on a treadmill at speeds of up to 7 km/h. The results confirmed the highly accurate heart rate detection capacity of the developed system and its feasibility for daily-life ECG monitoring.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25120162 PMCID: PMC4179047 DOI: 10.3390/s140814732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Configuration of the flexible electrode: (a) Top view; (b) side view; (c) photograph of actual electrode; (d) overall design; (e) person with the system around the waist.
Figure 2.(a) A conventional flexible electrode bends along the body curvature as shown in the left diagram, whereas a flexible electrode with conductive foam also covers the air gaps as shown in the right diagram; (b) Lifting of electrode caused by motion artifacts; (c) Sliding of electrode surface in the direction of motion artifacts (clothing is omitted in this figure).
Figure 3.Overall equivalent circuit of the electrode.
Figure 4.Frequency responses for different resistances: (a) Using 100% cotton as insulator; (b) using 100% polyester as insulator.
Figure 5.Schematic of the overall system.
Figure 6.Signals acquired at different walking speeds: (a) 4 km/h; (b) 5 km/h; (c) 6 km/h; (d) 7 km/h (top: proposed system, bottom: reference system).
Statistical results for QRS complex detection.
| Subject 1 | Standing | 361 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 km/h | 377 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 5 km/h | 469 | 2 | 3 | 99.36 | 98.95 | |
| 6 km/h | 422 | 9 | 15 | 96.59 | 94.62 | |
| 7 km/h | 464 | 30 | 54 | 89.58 | 84.67 | |
|
| ||||||
| Subject 2 | Standing | 280 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 km/h | 315 | 3 | 3 | 99.06 | 98.13 | |
| 5 km/h | 325 | 5 | 4 | 98.78 | 97.31 | |
| 6 km/h | 341 | 8 | 7 | 97.99 | 95.79 | |
| 7 km/h | 400 | 12 | 15 | 96.39 | 93.68 | |
|
| ||||||
| Subject 3 | Standing | 479 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 km/h | 375 | 3 | 0 | 100 | 99.21 | |
| 5 km/h | 406 | 8 | 5 | 98.78 | 96.90 | |
| 6 km/h | 434 | 16 | 11 | 97.53 | 94.55 | |
| 7 km/h | 350 | 10 | 6 | 98.31 | 95.62 | |
|
| ||||||
| Subject 4 | Standing | 239 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 km/h | 277 | 3 | 1 | 99.74 | 98.58 | |
| 5 km/h | 288 | 5 | 14 | 95.36 | 93.81 | |
| 6 km/h | 304 | 9 | 17 | 94.70 | 92.12 | |
| 7 km/h | 347 | 15 | 18 | 95.07 | 91.32 | |
|
| ||||||
| Mean | Standing | 339.75 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4 km/h | 336 | 2.25 | 1 | |||
| 5 km/h | 372 | 5 | 6.5 | |||
| 6 km/h | 375.25 | 10.5 | 12.5 | |||
| 7 km/h | 390.25 | 16.75 | 23.25 | |||