| Literature DB >> 30680493 |
Yayoi Tetsuou Tsukada1, Miwa Tokita2, Hiroshige Murata2, Yasuhiro Hirasawa2,3, Kenji Yodogawa2, Yu-Ki Iwasaki2, Kuniya Asai2, Wataru Shimizu2, Nahoko Kasai4, Hiroshi Nakashima4, Shingo Tsukada4.
Abstract
A highly conductive textile was woven from nano-fibers coated with the PEDOT-PSS polymer. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of textile electrodes for ECG recording as a smart garment. Electrode textile pads and lead wires were sewn to the lining of sportswear and their tolerability to repeated washings were tested up to 150 times. The electrical conductivity of the textile electrode remained functional for up to 50 machine washes. To assess the level of motion artifacts or noise during the daily monitoring of ECG, a single lead ECG with conventional or textile electrodes was recorded during supine rest, seated rest, upright trunk rotation (i.e., twisting), and stepping movement in 66 healthy adults. A Holter system was used for data storage and analysis. ECG patterns of P, QRS, and T waves were comparable between the conventional and textile electrodes. However, the signal-to-artifact-and/or-noise ratio (SAR) during twisting was larger in the textile electrodes than in the conventional electrodes. No skin irritation was seen in the textile electrodes. The single lead textile electrodes embedded in an inner garment were usable for continuous and/or repeated ECG monitoring in daily life except during vigorous trunk movement.Entities:
Keywords: Holter monitoring; Reusable; Textile electrode; Washable; Wearable device
Year: 2019 PMID: 30680493 PMCID: PMC6556171 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-019-01347-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 2.037
Fig. 1Wearable ECG of smart garment. The ECG sensor patches (5) were placed inside the undershirt (“1. 2.” outside and inside faces for men or the bra strap “3.4.” for women). (6) Cross-sectional view of the textile electrode (hitoe®). The cloth of polyester nanofiber (8) was coated by electroconductive polymer PEDOT-PSS (7, blue circles), which surface was directly placed on the skin (9). Back side of the electroconductive textile was fixed on the waterproof layer (12) and the cloth of the underwear (12). ECG signals were conducted through the textile electrodes (5. 10. 11) to electro-conductive yarn (15) and a snap hook button (14); then, these ECG electrodes and the lead wire were connected to the ECG transmitter (13)
Participant characteristics
| Gender | Overall ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male ( | Female ( | ||
| Age (years) | 34 ± 10 | 39 ± 10 | 35.5 ± 10.3 |
| Height (cm) | 171.2 ± 4.8 | 157.3 ± 5.5 | 167.2 ± 8.1 |
| BW (kg) | 62.1 ± 7.0 | 52.1 ± 5.4 | 58.2 ± 8.0 |
| BMI | 21.2 ± 1.9 | 21.0 ± 1.6 | 21.1 ± 1.8 |
| Chest Circumference (cm) | 87.0 ± 4.9 | 73.5 ± 3.9 | 82.1 ± 12.7 |
Values are reported as the mean ± SD
n number of participants, BW body weight, BMI body mass index
Fig. 2Signal voltage (QRS voltage)-to-artifact voltage ratio (SAR). The ratio of the QRS voltage to a baseline shift was quantified and termed the signal voltage (QRS voltage)-to-artifact voltage ratio or the extent of the drift level of the isoelectric line (SAR). In the present study, the SAR was calculated using a modification of Meziane’s method conditions
Electrode characteristics and ANSI/AAMI requirements for disposable ECG electrodes
| Textile | ANSI/AAMI | |
|---|---|---|
| DC resistance | < 0.1 KΩ | < 2 KΩ |
| AC impedance (12) | 1.26 ± 0.18 KΩ | < 3 KΩ |
| Internal noise | 1–3 μV | < 150 μV |
| Defibrillation discharge at 200 V | ||
| Recovery PV | 0.195 ± 0.80 mV | < 100 mV |
| Rate of change of PV | No change | < 1 mV/sec |
| AC impedance after test | 1.14 ± 0.07 KΩ | < 3 KΩ |
| DC offset voltage (12) | 0.0028 ± 0.0020 mV | < 100 mV |
Data are reported as the means ± SD
ANSI American National Standard Institute, AAMI Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, ANSI/AAMI standards: Ref. [14], PV depolarizing voltage, n: number of experiments
Fig. 3Washing durability of the textile electrodes
Fig. 4Representative tracings of the textile and conventional gel electrodes
Differences in the signal-to-artifact ratio between the textile and conventional electrodes
| Textile (66) | Conventional (66) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supine | 14.0 ± 8.6 | 19.5 ± 10.7 | 0.001 |
| Sitting | 12.0 ± 8.0 | 16.6 ± 8.2 | 0.001 |
| Twist | 2.5 ± 3.0 | 9.8 ± 6.7 | 0.001 |
| Stepping | 9.3 ± 8.8 | 13.2 ± 9.3 | 0.01 |
Values are reported as the means ± SD
n number of participants, including both men and women
Fig. 5Comparison of waveform recognition between the gel-type conventional electrode and the textile electrode at rest and during postural changes. a All volunteer subjects (n = 66). b Males (n = 47). c Females (n = 19)
Differences in the signal-to-artifact ratio between men and women for the textile and conventional gel electrodes
| Men (47) | Women (19) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supine | |||
| Textile | 14.5 ± 9.5 | 9.8 ± 4.5 | 0.05 |
| Conventional | 23.4 ± 10.0 | 12.6 ± 6.0 | 0.0001 |
| Sitting | |||
| Textile | 11.5 ± 8.7 | 9.6 ± 5.3 | NS |
| Conventional | 18.5 ± 7.9 | 11.5 ± 6.7 | 0.001 |
| Twist | |||
| Textile | 2.4 ± 3.0 | 2.9 ± 5.3 | NS |
| Conventional | 11.3 ± 7.2 | 5.7 ± 2.4 | 0.001 |
| Stepping | |||
| Textile | 11.3 ± 7.2 | 4.2 ± 5.9 | 0.01 |
| Conventional | 16.2 ± 9.3 | 5.7 ± 2.4 | 0.0001 |
Values are reported as the means ± SD
n number of participants