| Literature DB >> 33141838 |
Matthew I Jackson1, Christopher Waldy1, Dennis E Jewell1.
Abstract
Dietary digestion-resistant starch (RS) provides health benefits to the host via gut microbiome-mediated metabolism. The degree to which cats manifest beneficial changes in response to RS intake was examined. Healthy cats (N = 36) were fed identically formulated foods processed under high (n = 17) or low (n = 19) shear extrusion conditions (low and high RS levels [LRS and HRS], respectively). Fecal samples collected after 3 and 6 weeks' feeding were assayed for stool firmness score, short-chain fatty acids, ammonia, and changes to the global metabolome and microbiome; fecal immunoglobulin A (IgA) was analyzed at week 6. Few differences were seen in proximate analyses of the foods; stool firmness scores did not differ. In cats consuming HRS food, concentrations of fecal butyrate and the straight chain:branched chain fatty acid ratio were significantly greater in feces at both weeks 3 and 6, while fecal ammonia was reduced at week 6 relative to feces from LRS-fed cats. Fecal IgA concentrations were significantly higher at week 6 with HRS food. RS consumption altered 47% of the fecal metabolome; RS-derived sugars and metabolites associated with greater gut health, including indoles and polyamines, increased in the cats consuming HRS food relative to those fed the LS food, while endocannabinoid N-acylethanolamines decreased. Consumption of HRS food increased concentrations of the ketone body 3-hydroxybutyrate in feces and elevated concentrations of reduced members of NADH-coupled redox congeners and NADH precursors. At the microbiome genus-level, 21% of operational taxonomic units were significantly different between food types; many involved taxa with known saccharolytic or proteolytic proclivities. Microbiome taxa richness and Shannon and Simpson alpha diversity were significantly higher in the HRS group at both weeks. These data show that feline consumption of grain-derived RS produces potentially beneficial shifts in microbiota-mediated metabolism and increases IgA production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33141838 PMCID: PMC7608938 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Study food formulation, proximate analysis, and digestibility.
| LRS | HRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredient, % dry matter | Formulation | |
| Poultry by-product meal (low ash) | 37.3 | |
| Brewer's rice | 18.5 | |
| Corn gluten meal | 11.8 | |
| Whole grain corn | 10.3 | |
| Pork fat | 9.9 | |
| Cellulose | 2.8 | |
| Palatant (spray-dried chicken) | 2.0 | |
| Lactic acid | 1.2 | |
| Palatant (liver digest) | 1.2 | |
| Potassium chloride | 1.1 | |
| Choline chloride | 0.9 | |
| Calcium sulfate | 0.8 | |
| Beet pulp | 0.7 | |
| Methionine, dL | 0.5 | |
| Vitamin E oil | 0.3 | |
| Palatant (dried yeast) | 0.2 | |
| Sodium chloride, iodized | 0.2 | |
| Vitamin mix | 0.2 | |
| Mineral mix | 0.1 | |
| Taurine | 0.1 | |
| Phosphoric acid | < 0.1 | |
| Moisture | 4.9 | 5.4 |
| Fat | 18.9 | 19.0 |
| Protein | 37.6 | 38.0 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Ash | 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Crude fiber | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| Non-gelatinized starch (putative RS) | 0.5 | 7.9 |
| Apparent dry matter digestibility, % | 85.2 | 82.5 |
| Apparent protein digestibility, % | 86.8 | 83.0 |
| Apparent fat digestibility, % | 94.0 | 93.2 |
| Apparent fiber digestibility, % | 22.6 | 20.1 |
| Apparent NFE digestibility, % | 91.0 | 89.0 |
| Diet metabolic energy-AAFCO tested, kcal/kg | 4371 | 4286 |
AAFCO, Association of American Feed Control Officials; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch; NFE, nitrogen-free extract.
Fig 1Orthogonal partial least squares analysis of whole fecal differences at weeks 3 and 6 between LRS and HRS food-fed cats for the metabolome (A,B) and microbiome (C,D). Shading indicates 95% confidence regions. Metabolome permutation statistics at week 3 were: Q2 = 0.38, P < 0.001; R2Y = 0.80, P = 0.014 and at week 6 were: Q2 = 0.86, P < 0.001; R2Y = 0.96, P < 0.001. Microbiome permutation statistics at week 3 were: Q2 P < 0.001; R2Y P = 0.059 and at week 6 were: Q2 P < 0.001; R2Y P = 0.056. HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Summary of metabolite class changes.
| Metabolism Type | Class | HRS/LRS |
|---|---|---|
| RS sugars | ||
| other sugars | ||
| Fermentation | SCFA | |
| lactate | ||
| dipeptides | ||
| amino acids | ||
| Putrefaction | ammonia | |
| beneficial indoles | ||
| detrimental indoles | ||
| biogenic tryptophan amine | ||
| kynurenine | ||
| serotonin | ||
| polyamines | ||
| 1-acylglycerols | ||
| lysophospholipids | ||
| fatty acids | ||
| ketone body metabolism | ||
| Bioactive lipids | N-acylethanolamines | |
| 2-acylglycerols | ||
| NAD(H) precursors |
HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch; NAD(H), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, oxidized or reduced form; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid.
Sugars derived from resistant starch and other sugars detected via metabolomic screening in fecal samples taken at weeks 3 and 6 from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Type | Metabolite | Week 3 | Week 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log2(FC) | Log2(FC) | ||
| glucose | |||
| maltose | |||
| maltotriose | |||
| maltotetraose | |||
| mannose | |||
| N-acetylglucosaminylasparagine | |||
| glucuronate | |||
| diacetylchitobiose | |||
| fucose | |||
| arabinose | |||
| erythrose | |||
| fructose | |||
| ribose | |||
| ribulose/xylulose | |||
| sedoheptulose | |||
| xylose | |||
| erythronate | |||
| threonate |
FC, fold-change of HRS/LRS; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Concentrations of a given metabolite in the HRS group versus the LRS group by independent t-test (week 3 or week 6) or mixed model (weeks 3 & 6) at P < 0.05 and q < 0.1 are shown as significantly higher (red), significantly lower (green), or unchanged (white). Full numerical data are available in S3 Table.
Short-chain fatty acids in fecal samples taken at weeks 3 and 6 from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Week 3 | Week 6 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRS | HRS | HRS-LRS | Independent t-test | LRS | HRS | HRS-LRS | Independent t-test | |
| Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | Delta | p | Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | Delta | p | |
| Fatty acid | ||||||||
| Acetate | 2781.2 (266.7) | 3456.8 (269.6) | 675.6 | 0.087 | 2378.8 (240.1) | 2681.9 (193.1) | 303.1 | 0.338 |
| Propionate | 1289.8 (107.8) | 1460.8 (114.8) | 171.0 | 0.288 | 1033.1 (112.6) | 1165.1 (92.4) | 132.0 | 0.377 |
| Butyrate | 1369.0 (120.9) | 2397.8 (183.7) | 1028.7 | < 0.001 | 1303.8 (93.2) | 1842.8 (171.6) | 539.0 | 0.013 |
| Isobutyrate | 282.0 (25.6) | 268.6 (20.2) | -13.4 | 0.685 | 281.6 (20.1) | 250.9 (17.7) | -30.7 | 0.265 |
| 2-methylbutyrate | 176.8 (17.4) | 169.4 (12.0) | -7.4 | 0.730 | 185.8 (17.5) | 165.8 (13.6) | -19.9 | 0.380 |
| Isovalerate | 342.7 (29.3) | 339.1 (22.8) | -3.6 | 0.923 | 350.4 (24.2) | 310.0 (20.2) | -40.4 | 0.216 |
| Total SCFA | 5440.0 (444.4) | 7315.4 (422.3) | 1875.4 | 0.005 | 4715.7 (396.8) | 5689.7 (359.2) | 974.1 | 0.084 |
| Total BCFA | 801.4 (71.9) | 777.0 (54.2) | -24.4 | 0.789 | 817.7 (61.4) | 726.8 (50.9) | -91.0 | 0.268 |
| SCFA/BCFA | 7.0 (0.5) | 9.9 (0.8) | 2.9 | 0.004 | 5.9 (0.5) | 8.2 (0.7) | 2.3 | 0.014 |
*Two subjects were removed from analysis as statistical outliers: values of 4229.4 (Subject 14) and 3107.2 ppm (Subject 35).
BCFA, branched -chain fatty acid; FC, fold change; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid; SE, standard error.
Assays were performed as previously described [28].
Dipeptides and amino acids detected via metabolomic screening in fecal samples taken at weeks 3 and 6 from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Type | Metabolite | Week 3 | Week 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log2(FC) | Log2(FC) | ||
| alanylleucine | |||
| cysteinylglycine | |||
| glutaminylleucine | |||
| glycylisoleucine | |||
| glycylleucine | |||
| glycylvaline | |||
| histidylalanine | |||
| isoleucylglycine | |||
| leucylalanine | |||
| leucylglutamine | |||
| leucylglycine | |||
| lysylleucine | |||
| phenylalanylalanine | |||
| phenylalanylglycine | |||
| prolylglycine | |||
| prolylhydroxyproline | |||
| threonylphenylalanine | |||
| tryptophylglycine | |||
| tyrosylglycine | |||
| valerylphenylalanine | |||
| valeryltryptophan | |||
| valylglutamine | |||
| valylglycine | |||
| valylleucine | |||
| alanine | |||
| arginine | |||
| asparagine | |||
| aspartate | |||
| cysteine | |||
| glutamate | |||
| glutamine | |||
| glycine | |||
| histidine | |||
| isoleucine | |||
| leucine | |||
| lysine | |||
| methionine | |||
| phenylalanine | |||
| proline | |||
| serine | |||
| taurine | |||
| threonine | |||
| tryptophan | |||
| tyrosine | |||
| valine |
FC, fold change; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Concentrations of a given metabolite in the HRS group versus the LRS group by independent t-test (week 3 or week 6) or mixed model (weeks 3 & 6) at P < 0.05 and q < 0.1 are shown as significantly higher (red), significantly lower (green), or unchanged (white). Full numerical data are available in S3 Table.
Indoles and polyamines detected via metabolomic screening in fecal samples taken at weeks 3 and 6 from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Type | Metabolite | Week 3 | Week 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log2(FC) | Log2(FC) | ||
| 2-oxindole-3-acetate | |||
| 3-hydroxyindolin-2-one | |||
| 3-hydroxyindolin-2-one sulfate | |||
| 3-indoxyl sulfate | |||
| 5-hydroxyindoleacetate | |||
| indole | |||
| indoleacetate | |||
| indoleacetylglycine | |||
| indolelactate | |||
| indolepropionate | |||
| indolin-2-one | |||
| methyl indole-3-acetate | |||
| cadaverine | |||
| N-acetyl-cadaverine | |||
| putrescine | |||
| N-acetylputrescine | |||
| N-acetyl-isoputreanine | |||
| spermidine | |||
| diacetylspermidine | |||
| (N(1) + N(8))-acetylspermidine | |||
| N(1)-acetylspermine | |||
| N1,N12-diacetylspermine | |||
| carboxyethyl-GABA |
FC, fold change; GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Concentrations of a given metabolite in the HRS group versus the LRS group by independent t-test (week 3 or week 6) or mixed model (weeks 3 & 6) at P < 0.05 and q < 0.1 are shown as significantly higher (red), significantly lower (green), or unchanged (white). Full numerical data are available in S3 Table.
Ketogenic metabolites, ethanolamides, and bile acids detected via metabolomic screening in fecal samples taken at weeks 3 and 6 from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Type | Metabolite | Week 3 | Week 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log2(FC) | Log2(FC) | ||
| 3-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) | |||
| 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate (HMG) | |||
| caproate (6:0) | |||
| 3-hydroxyhexanoate | |||
| palmitoyl ethanolamide | |||
| palmitoleoyl ethanolamide | |||
| margaroyl ethanolamide | |||
| stearoyl ethanolamide | |||
| oleoyl ethanolamide | |||
| linoleoyl ethanolamide | |||
| dihomo-linolenoyl ethanolamide | |||
| arachidoyl ethanolamide (20:0) | |||
| arachidonoyl ethanolamide | |||
| behenoyl ethanolamide (22:0) | |||
| erucoyl ethanolamide (22:1) | |||
| lignoceroyl ethanolamide (24:0) | |||
| nervonoyl ethanolamide (24:1) | |||
| chenodeoxycholate | |||
| cholate | |||
| cholate sulfate | |||
| glycochenodeoxycholate | |||
| hyocholate | |||
| taurochenodeoxycholate | |||
| taurocholate | |||
| taurocholenate sulfate | |||
| ursocholate | |||
| 12-dehydrocholate | |||
| 3-dehydrocholate | |||
| 6-oxolithocholate | |||
| 7-ketodeoxycholate | |||
| 7-ketolithocholate | |||
| dehydrolithocholate | |||
| deoxycholate | |||
| glycodeoxycholate | |||
| glycolithocholate | |||
| isohyodeoxycholate | |||
| isoursodeoxycholate | |||
| lithocholate | |||
| taurodeoxycholate | |||
| taurolithocholate 3-sulfate |
FC, fold change; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Concentrations of a given metabolite in the HRS group versus the LRS group by independent t-test (week 3 or week 6) or mixed model (weeks 3 & 6) at P < 0.05 and q < 0.1 are shown as significantly higher (red), significantly lower (green), or unchanged (white). Full numerical data are available in S3 Table.
Redox-coupled congeners detected via metabolomic screening in fecal samples taken at weeks 3 and 6 from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Source | Redox Ratios and Congeners | Week 3 | Week 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log2(FC) | Log2(FC) | ||
| Sugar | lactate/pyruvate | ||
| lactate | |||
| pyruvate | |||
| Isoleucine | 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate/3-methyl-2-oxovalerate | ||
| 2-hydroxy-3-methylvalerate | |||
| 3-methyl-2-oxovalerate | |||
| Leucine | alpha-hydroxyisocaproate/4-methyl-2-oxopentanoate | ||
| alpha-hydroxyisocaproate | |||
| 4-methyl-2-oxopentanoate | |||
| Valine | alpha-hydroxyisovalerate/3-methyl-2-oxobutyrate | ||
| alpha-hydroxyisovalerate | |||
| 3-methyl-2-oxobutyrate | |||
| Phenylalanine | phenyllactate/phenylpyruvate | ||
| phenyllactate (PLA) | |||
| phenylpyruvate |
*Derived ratios were not included in q value estimation.
FC, fold change; HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Concentrations of a given metabolite in the HRS versus the LRS group by independent t-test (week 3 or week 6) or mixed model (weeks 3 & 6) at P < 0.05 and q < 0.1 are shown as significantly higher (red), significantly lower (green), or unchanged (white). Full numerical data are available in S3 Table.
Fig 2Significant genus-level taxa differences in the fecal microbiome from consumption of HRS or LRS food using a mixed model of weeks 3 and 6.
Subject and collection number were random factors. Operational taxonomic unit number, family, and genus are shown for those with the greatest differences; full data are available in S3 Table. HRS, high resistant starch; LRS, low resistant starch.
Alpha diversity metrics from fecal samples from cats fed LRS or HRS food.
| Alpha Diversity Index | Week 3 | Week 6 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRS | HRS | HRS-LRS | Mixed Model | LRS | HRS | HRS-LRS | Mixed Model | |
| Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | Delta | p value | Mean (SE) | Mean (SE) | Delta | p value | |
| S | 104.63 (2.44) | 109.42 (1.90) | 4.78 | 0.004 | 102.85 (3.21) | 110.66 (2.76) | 7.81 | 0.004 |
| expH | 16.92 (0.79) | 21.06 (0.84) | 4.15 | 0.027 | 16.98 (0.67) | 20.50 (0.66) | 3.52 | 0.034 |
| invSimp | 10.04 (0.51) | 12.34 (0.68) | 2.30 | 0.003 | 10.34 (0.50) | 12.21 (0.53) | 1.87 | 0.013 |
| J | 0.60 (0.01) | 0.64 (0.01) | 0.04 | 0.221 | 0.61 (0.01) | 0.64 (0.01) | 0.03 | 0.099 |
*Subject as a random factor. Subject and collection number as random factors.
expH, exponential of the Shannon index; HRS, high resistant starch; invSimp, inverse of the Simpson index; J, Pielou's evenness; LRS, low resistant starch; S, taxa richness; SE, standard error.
Data are presented as mean (SE).