| Literature DB >> 30914514 |
Dereje Abate Negatu1,2, Yoshiyuki Yamada1, Yu Xi3, Mei Lin Go3, Matthew Zimmerman4, Uday Ganapathy4, Véronique Dartois4, Martin Gengenbacher4, Thomas Dick5,6.
Abstract
Indole propionic acid (IPA), produced by the gut microbiota, is active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro and in vivo However, its mechanism of action is unknown. IPA is the deamination product of tryptophan (Trp) and thus a close structural analog of this essential aromatic amino acid. De novo Trp biosynthesis in M. tuberculosis is regulated through feedback inhibition: Trp acts as an allosteric inhibitor of anthranilate synthase TrpE, which catalyzes the first committed step in the Trp biosynthesis pathway. Hence, we hypothesized that IPA may mimic Trp as an allosteric inhibitor of TrpE and exert its antimicrobial effect by blocking synthesis of Trp at the TrpE catalytic step. To test our hypothesis, we carried out metabolic, chemical rescue, genetic, and biochemical analyses. Treatment of mycobacteria with IPA inhibited growth and reduced the intracellular level of Trp, an effect abrogated upon supplementation of Trp in the medium. Missense mutations at the allosteric Trp binding site of TrpE eliminated Trp inhibition and caused IPA resistance. In conclusion, we have shown that IPA blocks Trp biosynthesis in M. tuberculosis via inhibition of TrpE by mimicking the physiological allosteric inhibitor of this enzyme.IMPORTANCE New drugs against tuberculosis are urgently needed. The tryptophan (Trp) analog indole propionic acid (IPA) is the first antitubercular metabolite produced by human gut bacteria. Here, we show that this antibiotic blocks Trp synthesis, an in vivo essential biosynthetic pathway in M. tuberculosis Intriguingly, IPA acts by decoupling a bacterial feedback regulatory mechanism: it mimics Trp as allosteric inhibitor of anthranilate synthase, thereby switching off Trp synthesis regardless of intracellular Trp levels. The identification of IPA's target paves the way for the discovery of more potent TrpE ligands employing rational, target-based lead optimization.Entities:
Keywords: NTM; TrpE; allosteric inhibitor; antibiotic; tryptophan mimic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30914514 PMCID: PMC6437058 DOI: 10.1128/mBio.02781-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.867
FIG 1IPA and Trp docking into the allosteric pocket of M. tuberculosis TrpE. (A) Superposition of three TrpE crystal structures from M. tuberculosis without bound Trp (PDB no. 5CWA [yellow]) (15), Serratia marcescens with bound Trp (PDB no. 1I7S [green]) (19), and Salmonella Typhimurium with bound Trp (PDB no. 1I1Q [blue]) (14). The location of Trp is indicated in red. The superposition was performed using the MOE software (44). IPA (B) and Trp (C) were docked into the structure of M. tuberculosis TrpE (5CWA) (15) using the AutoDockTools 4 (ADT) and Vina programs (17, 18). The ADT and the Vina poses are colored green and blue, respectively. The calculated binding energies were −5.79 (ADT) and −8.2 (Vina) kcal/mol for IPA and −6.73 (ADT) and −8.2 (Vina) kcal/mol for Trp. Amino acid residues shown in panels B and C have at least one atom within a 5-Å radius of IPA or Trp. Leu54, Glu55, Ser56, Ser 64, and Trp66 are part of the allosteric Trp binding motif 53LLESX10S67 (Fig. 5) reported by Bashiri et al. (15).
FIG 2Trp biosynthetic pathway and proposed mechanism of action of IPA. Negative-feedback inhibition by Trp and the proposed inhibitory activity of IPA on anthranilate synthase TrpE are indicated. CM, chorismate mutase. (Inset) The known Trp biosynthesis inhibitor fluoro-anthranilate is a substrate of TrpD and is converted to fluoro-tryptophan (12, 20).
FIG 5M. tuberculosis TrpE amino acid sequence, Trp binding site motifs, and location of IPA–fluoro-anthranilate double-resistant missense mutations. (A) Amino acid sequence of the N-terminal half of TrpE. The allosteric Trp binding motif LLESX10S is indicated by the gray background. Residues involved directly in subunit association are underlined. Arg65 in the X10 loop of the Trp allosteric binding motif, forming a hydrogen bond with His170, is marked by a blue arrow. Positions of the IPA and fluoro-anthranilate double-resistance mutations identified in this work are indicated in red. The Phe68Ile mutation site identified by Zhang et al. is indicated in green (12). (B) View of the TrpE dimer interface. The two monomers are colored yellow and orange, respectively. Hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashed lines. The amino groups of His170/His170′ form hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl groups of Arg65/Arg65′ (the N···O distance is 2.81 Å). His170 and His170′ interact via pi-pi stacking. Structure and motif annotations are according to Bashiri and colleagues (15). (C) Location and nature of IPA–fluoro-anthranilate double-resistance-conferring missense mutations. *, mutants were selected on fluoro-anthranilate-containing agar. Other mutants were selected on IPA-containing agar. #, mutations identified in M. bovis BCG. Other mutations were derived from M. tuberculosis. The TrpE amino acid sequences of M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis are identical.
Selection and characterization of fluoro-anthranilate- and IPA-resistant M. bovis BCG and M. tuberculosis mutants
| Selection drug | Mutation | Resistance | Strain | Resistance to: | Mutation(s) in | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | IPA | Rv0880 | Rv0948c | Other | ||||||||||
| MIC (μM) | Fold | MIC (μM) | Fold | Nuc | AA | Nuc | AA | Nuc | AA | |||||
| FA | ||||||||||||||
| BCG | 2 × 10−8 | FAr, IPAr (2) | BCG_FAR_M1 | 7→798 | 114.0 | 62→522 | 8.4 | 199 (T→G) | 67 (S→A) | |||||
| BCG_FAR_M2 | 7→801 | 114.4 | 62→518 | 8.4 | 388 (G→T) | 130 (V→F) | ||||||||
| 8 × 10−9 | FAr, IPAr (1) | MTB_FAR_M1 | 26→1,350 | 51.9 | 112→1,167 | 10.4 | 508 (C→A) | 170 (H→N) | ||||||
| IPA | ||||||||||||||
| BCG | 7 × 10−6 | FAs, IPAr(L) (6) | BCG_IPAR_M1 | 7→7 | 0.9 | 62→167 | 2.7 | 196 (A→C) | 66 (T→P) | ND | ||||
| BCG_IPAR_M2 | 7→8 | 1.1 | 62→175 | 2.8 | 107 (A→C) | 36 (Q→P) | ND | |||||||
| BCG_IPAR_M3 | 7→6 | 0.9 | 62→162 | 2.6 | 179 (T→C) | 60 (V→A) | ND | |||||||
| BCG_IPAR_M4 | 7→8 | 1.1 | 62→160 | 2.6 | 191 (C→T) | 64 (S→L) | ND | |||||||
| BCG_IPAR_M5 | 7→7 | 1.0 | 62→182 | 2.9 | 231 (T→Δ) | Shift | ND | |||||||
| BCG_IPAR_M6 | 7→8 | 1.1 | 62→398 | 6.4 | 191 (C→T) | 64 (S→L) | ND | |||||||
| FAr(L), IPAr (1) | BCG_IPAR_M7 | 7→570 | 81.4 | 62→650 | 10.5 | 230 (T→C) | 77 (V→A) | ND | ||||||
| 2 × 10−6 | FAs, IPAr(L) (4) | MTB_IPAR_M1 | 26→35 | 1.3 | 112→625 | 5.6 | −7 (C→G) | Upstream | ||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M2 | 26→31 | 1.2 | 112→501 | 4.5 | 110 (T→C) | 37 (L→P) | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M3 | 26→24 | 0.9 | 112→557 | 5.0 | 110 (T→C) | 37 (L→P) | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M4 | 26→27 | 1.0 | 112→463 | 4.1 | 248 (A→G) | 83 (H→R) | ||||||||
| FAr(L), IPAr (2) | MTB_IPAR_M5 | 26→240 | 9.2 | 112→867 | 7.7 | 190 (T→C) | 64 (S→P) | Rv2019 | ||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M6 | 26→250 | 9.6 | 112→1,119 | 10.0 | 300 (G→C) | 100 (R→S) | Rv3169 | |||||||
| 9 × 10−6 | FAr, IPAr (4) | MTB_IPAR_M7 | 26→1,000 | 38.5 | 112→809 | 7.2 | 271 (C→T) | 91 (P→S) | ||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M8 | 26→1,400 | 53.8 | 112→1,089 | 9.7 | 509 (A→G) | 170 (H→R) | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M9 | 26→1,380 | 53.1 | 112→1,114 | 9.9 | 509 (A→G) | 170 (H→R) | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M10 | 26→1,421 | 54.7 | 112→1,009 | 9.0 | 509 (A→G) | 170 (H→R) | ||||||||
| FAr(L), IPAr (1) | MTB_IPAR_M11 | 26→300 | 11.5 | 112→1,297 | 11.6 | 98 (G→T) | 33 (R→L) | Rv2942 | ||||||
| FAs, IPAr(L) (7) | MTB_IPAR_M12 | 26→33 | 1.3 | 112→752 | 6.7 | 86 (C→A) | Stop | Rv1576c | ||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M13 | 26→22 | 0.8 | 112→778 | 6.9 | 86 (C→G) | Stop | Rv3626c | |||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M14 | 26→30 | 1.2 | 112→704 | 6.3 | 98 (C→T) | 33 (S→L) | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M15 | 26→25 | 1.0 | 112→671 | 6.0 | 101 (T→Δ) | Shift | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M16 | 26→28 | 1.1 | 112→690 | 6.2 | 106 (C→T) | Stop | ||||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M17 | 26→27 | 1.0 | 112→605 | 5.4 | 281 (T→G) | 94 (V→G) | Rv1248c, Rv3626c | |||||||
| MTB_IPAR_M18 | 26→29 | 1.1 | 112→724 | 6.5 | 328 (C→T) | Stop | Rv0907 | |||||||
FA, fluoro-anthranilate; IPA, indole propionic acid. In the experiment listed as “M. tuberculosis 200 expt,” 200 IPA-resistant M. tuberculosis strains were isolated and then tested for cross-resistance against FA by streak-out on FA-containing agar. Five IPA-FA cross-resistant strains were identified and characterized further. Furthermore, 7 IPA-resistant–FA-sensitive strains from this screen were selected and characterized further.
Mutation frequency, spontaneous resistance mutation frequency.
FAr, high-level FA resistance; FAr(L), low-level FA resistance; FAs, FA sensitive; IPAr, high-level IPA resistance; IPAr(L), low-level IPA resistance.
Nuc, location and nature of single nucleotide polymorphism in coding sequence of respective gene; AA, location and nature of amino acid substitution or other effects on coding sequence (stop/nonsense codon, frameshift) associated with respective DNA polymorphism. MTB_IPAR_M1 harbored a C-to-G substitution 7 bp upstream of the start codon of Rv0880. Mutations in other genes represent genes other than trpE, Rv0880, and Rv0948c for which whole-genome sequencing revealed DNA polymorphisms. All strains shown were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, with the exception of the BCG strains labeled “ND.” All strains were subjected to targeted Sanger sequencing for trpE, Rv0880, and Rv0948.
FIG 3Effect of IPA on intrabacterial Trp concentrations. Exponentially growing M. bovis BCG cultures were treated with increasing IPA, fluoro-anthranilate (FA [positive control]), or ethambutol (EMB [negative control]) concentrations for 24 h, and Trp content was measured using LC-MS. Drug concentrations are given as fold MIC. Experiments were carried out three times independently. A statistical test was performed to determine the significance of Trp reduction upon 24 h of treatment employing a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) multiple-analysis tool comparing each treated sample with untreated samples using GraphPad Prism 6 software. n.s, P > 0.05; *, P ≤ 0.05; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001.
FIG 4Effect of supplementation of medium with anthranilate or Trp on IPA’s growth-inhibitory activity. Effect of anthranilate and Trp on growth-inhibitory activity of (A) IPA, (B) positive control fluoro-anthranilate (FA), and (C) negative control ethambutol (EMB). Exponentially growing M. tuberculosis cultures were treated with increasing concentration of drugs, either without any supplement or with 1 mM Trp or 0.2 mM anthranilate. The OD600 was determined after 7 days of incubation in 96-well plates. Experiments were carried out three times independently in duplicate. Mean values and standard deviations are shown.
FIG 6Effect of expression of trpE alleles Ser67Ala and His170Asn in the wild-type M. bovis BCG background on IPA’s growth-inhibitory activity. (A) Exponentially growing cultures of M. bovis BCG harboring plasmid pMV262, containing the coding sequence of TrpESer67Ala, TrpEHis170Asn, and the TrpE wild type expressed constitutively from the plasmid’s hsp60 expression signals, and “empty” pMV262 vector (“WT control”) were treated with increasing IPA concentrations, and the OD600 was measured after 7 days. (B) Experiment as in panel A, but using increasing concentrations of the positive control fluoro-anthranilate (FA) instead of IPA. (C) Experiment as in panel A but using the non-Trp synthesis-targeting negative-control drug ethambutol (EMB). Experiments were carried out three times independently in duplicate. Mean values and standard deviations are shown.
Summary of IPA–fluoro-anthranilate (FA) susceptibility patterns, their associated genotypes, and proposed mechanisms of resistance
| IPA/FA | Gene harboring | Type of mutations | Proposed mechanism of |
|---|---|---|---|
| High IPA/FA resistance | Missense mutations at | Loss of IPA/F-Trp | |
| High IPA/low FA | Rv0948c, chorismate mutase | Missense mutations at | Increased chorismate concentration |
| Low IPA resistance/ | Rv0880, multiple antibiotic | Deletions and nonsense and | To be determined; indirect effect |
The Trp biosynthesis pathway coverts FA into F-Trp (20). For details, refer to Table 1.