Literature DB >> 16326876

Revision of an acetabular liner has a high risk of dislocation.

A W Blom1, L Astle, J Loveridge, I D Learmonth.   

Abstract

Polyethylene liners of modular acetabular components wear sometimes need to be replaced, despite the metal shell being well fixed. Replacing the liner is a relatively simple procedure, but very little is known of the outcome of revision. We prospectively followed up 1126 Harris-Galante I metal-backed, uncemented components for between nine and 19 years. We found 38 (3.4%) liners of 1126 acetabular components wore and required revision. These revisions were then followed up for a mean of 4.8 years. The rate of dislocation was 28.9%. Nine of the dislocations occurred once and two were recurrent. The overall secondary revision rate was three of 38 total hip replacements (7.9%) at a mean follow-up of 4.8 years. This gives a 92.1% survivorship (35 of 38) at under five years. In isolated revision of a liner, we had a complication rate of 23% (three of 13). In revision of a liner combined with revision of the femoral stem, there was a complication rate of 48% (12 of 25). We discuss possible reasons for the high dislocation rates. Leaving the well-fixed acetabular shell in situ leads to an increased risk of instability. However, this needs to be balanced against the otherwise low complication rate for revision of the liner. Patients should be consented accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16326876     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.16349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  10 in total

1.  The fate of grafting acetabular defects during revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Mall; Ryan M Nunley; Kirk E Smith; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Henry Ho; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Falez; Matteo Papalia; Fabio Favetti; Gabriele Panegrossi; Filippo Casella; Gianluca Mazzotta
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Isolated polyethylene exchange versus acetabular revision for polyethylene wear.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Elie Ghanem; Carrie Houssock; Mathew Austin; Javad Parvizi; William J Hozack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The Survival of Well-Fixed Cementless Femoral Component After Isolated Acetabular Component Revision.

Authors:  Mehmet Ekinci; Yucel Bilgin; Yasin Sayar; Omer Naci Ergin; Ahmet Salduz; Turgut Akgul; Irfan Ozturk
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  An unusual presentation of catastrophic failure of hip arthroplasty with a thigh mass.

Authors:  Florian Dibra; Hari Parvataneni
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-04-08

8.  Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Christine Livesey; Michael R Whitehouse; Steve Eastaugh-Waring; Gordon C Bannister; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1-5 years.

Authors:  M van Heumen; P J C Heesterbeek; B A Swierstra; G G Van Hellemondt; J H M Goosen
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-24

10.  High risk of hip dislocation following polyethylene liner exchange in total hip arthroplasty-is cup revision necessary?

Authors:  D Dammerer; F Schneider; T Renkawitz; D Putzer; M Bogensperger; R Biedermann
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.