| Literature DB >> 33127928 |
Siya Kamat1, Madhuree Kumari1, Kuttuvan Valappil Sajna1, C Jayabaskaran2.
Abstract
The marine ecosystem is an extraordinary reserve of pharmaceutically important, bioactive compounds even in this "synthetic age". Marine algae-associated endophytic fungi have gained prominence as an important source of bioactive compounds. This study was conducted on secondary metabolites of Chaetomium globosum-associated with marine green alga Chaetomorpha media from the Konkan coastline, India. Its ethyl acetate extract (CGEE) exhibited an IC50 value of 7.9 ± 0.1 µg/mL on MCF-7 cells. CGEE exhibited G2M phase cell cycle arrest, ROS production and MMP loss in MCF-7 cells. The myco-components in CGEE contributing to the cytotoxicity were found by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry analyses. Chrysin, a dihydroxyflavone was one of the forty-six myco-components which is commonly found in honey, propolis and passionflower extracts. The compound was isolated and characterized as fungal chrysin using HPLC, UV-Vis spectroscopy, LC-MS, IR and NMR analyses by comparing with standard chrysin. The purified compound exhibited an IC50 value of 49.0 ± 0.6 µM while that of standard chrysin was 48.5 ± 1.6 µM in MCF-7 cells. It induced apoptosis, G1 phase cell cycle arrest, MMP loss, and ROS production. This is the first report of chrysin from an alternative source with opportunities for yield enhancement.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33127928 PMCID: PMC7603332 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72497-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) Structure of Chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone). (B) Seven days old endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum (PG 1.6) cultured on potato dextrose agar.
The table represents IC50 values exhibited by CGEE after 48 h of treatment on various human cell lines as evaluated by MTT assay.
| Endophyte | IC50 (µg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeLa | A549 | A431 | MCF-7 | HEK 293 T | |
| 8.1 ± 0.1 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 7.9 ± 0.1 | > 200 | |
The extract demonstrated significant cytotoxicity on human cancer cells while negligible cytotoxic effect on human embryonic kidney cells.
Myco-components detected in ethyl acetate total culture extract of C. globosum by GC–MS analysis.
| S. no | Name of the component | Chemical formula | Retention time (mins) | Relative abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Disiloxane, 1,3-bis(chloromethyl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyl- | C6H16Cl2OSi2 | 7.197 | 0.9299 ± 0.5 |
| 2 | Carbamodithioic acid, phenyl-, methyl ester | C8H9NS2 | 7.291 | 0.003015 ± 0.1 |
| 3 | CH3CONHSi (CH3)3 | 7.3048 | 0.5491 ± 0.8 | |
| 4 | 2-Butenoic acid, tert-butyldimethylsilyl ester | C17H36O3Si2 | 7.8719 | 0.15488 ± 0.1 |
| 5 | Formamide, | HCON(C2H5)2 | 7.886 | 0.8218 ± 1.1 |
| 6 | Isoquinolin-6,7-diol, 1-methyl | C10H9NO2 | 8.2131 | 1.2960 ± 1.7 |
| 7 | 1-Hexene, 4,5-dimethyl- | C8H16 | 8.2312 | 1.30402 ± 0.1 |
| 8 | Sulfurous acid, di(cyclohexylmethyl) ester | C14H26O3S | 8.2767 | 0.01376 ± 0.1 |
| 9 | Azetidine, 1-acetyl-2-methyl- | C6H11NO | 8.2854 | 2.83459 ± 0.2 |
| 10 | Disilathiane, hexamethyl | C6H18SSi2 | 8.348 | 1.39148 ± 0.1 |
| 11 | 2,4,4-Trimethyl-1-hexene | C9H18 | 8.4016 | 0.4074 ± 0.6 |
| 12 | Acetamide, | C4H9NO | 8.8449 | 0.3275 ± 0.5 |
| 13 | Tris(trimethylsilyl)borate | C9H27BO3Si3 | 9.1013 | 0.557147 ± 0.1 |
| 14 | 1,2-Bis(trimethylsiloxy)ethane | C8H22O2Si2 | 9.1285 | 0.8199 ± 1.1 |
| 15 | Silanol, trimethyl-, carbonate (2:1) | C7H18O3Si2 | 8.7307 | 0.3330 ± 0.5 |
| 16 | Acetamide, | C4H9NO | 8.8449 | 0.3280 ± 0.5 |
| 17 | 1,2-Bis(trimethylsiloxy)ethane | C8H22O2Si2 | 9.1285 | 0.8200 ± 1.1 |
| 18 | Acetamide, | C6H13NO | 9.5024 | 1.5998 ± 2.2 |
| 19 | 2,2-Diethylacetamide | C6H13NO | 10.0863 | 2.5606 ± 3.6 |
| 20 | Tris(trimethylsilyl)carbamate | C10H27NO2Si3 | 10.316 | 0.1908 ± 0.3 |
| 21 | C8H19NO2Si | 11.0868 | 0.2737 ± 0.4 | |
| 22 | Propanoic acid, 2-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester | C9H22O3Si2 | 11.2173 | 0.5037 ± 0.7 |
| 23 | Acetic acid, [(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-, trimethylsilyl ester | C8H20O3Si2 | 11.7152 | 1.2734 ± 1.8 |
| 24 | Isophorone | C9H14O | 13.1412 | 0.3485 ± 0.5 |
| 25 | Silanol, trimethyl-, phosphate (3:1) | C9H27O4PSi3 | 17.332 | 0.4860 ± 0.7 |
| 26 | Glycerol, tris(trimethylsilyl) ether | C12H32O3Si3 | 17.4314 | 0.8582 ± 1.2 |
| 27 | Butanedioic acid, bis(trimethylsilyl) ester | C10H22O4Si2 | 18.5644 | 0.3425 ± 0.5 |
| 28 | 2-(2-Butoxyethoxy)ethoxy-trimethylsilane | C11H26O3Si | 19.1932 | 0.2287 ± 0.3 |
| 29 | L-Proline, 5-oxo-1-(trimethylsilyl)-, trimethylsilyl ester | C11H23NO3Si2 | 23.7834 | 0.2626 ± 0.4 |
| 30 | Tricyclo[5.2.1.0(2,6)]decane, 3-methylene-4-phenyl | C17H20 | 27.9234 | 1.3391 ± 1.9 |
| 31 | 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(trimethylsilyl) ester | C14H22O4Si2 | 29.9265 | 0.2885 ± 0.4 |
| 32 | 1-Nonadecene | C19H38 | 30.1214 | 0.1761363 ± 0.2 |
| 33 | Azelaic acid, bis(trimethylsilyl) ester | C15H32O4Si2 | 30.1519 | 0.1670219 ± 0.8 |
| 34 | D-(-)-Ribofuranose, tetrakis(trimethylsilyl) ether (isomer 2) | C17H42O5Si4 | 31.0492 | 0.6179 ± 0.9 |
| 35 | Salbutamol, N-trifluoroacetyl-O,O,o-tris(trimethylsilyl)deriv | C24H44F3NO4Si3 | 31.309 | 0.3250 ± 0.5 |
| 36 | α-D-Allopyranose, pentakis(trimethylsilyl) ether | C21H52O6Si5 | 32.3191 | 0.2874 ± 0.4 |
| 37 | Hexadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester | C19H40O2Si | 35.1335 | 3.0713 ± 4.0 |
| 38 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-, trimethylsilyl ester | C21H40O2Si | 38.1093 | 3.3908 ± 4.7 |
| 39 | Oleic acid, trimethylsilyl ester | C21H42O2Si | 38.2218 | 1.7593 ± 2.4 |
| 40 | trans-9-Octadecenoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester | C21H42O2Si | 38.2268 | 7.27069 ± 0.8 |
| 41 | Octadecanoic acid, trimethylsilyl ester | C21H44O2Si | 38.7029 | 3.2747 ± 4.6 |
| 42 | Stearic acid, 2-(1-octadecenyloxy)ethyl ester, (Z)- | C38H74O3 | 42.4672 | 1.2604 ± 1.8 |
| 43 | Hexadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]propyl ester | C25H54O4Si2 | 44.2692 | 0.4854 ± 0.7 |
| 45 | Octadecanoic acid, 2,3-bis[(trimethylsilyl)oxy] propyl ester | C27H58O4Si2 | 47.0836 | 2.1723 ± 3.0 |
| 46 | .psi.,.psi.-Carotene, 1,1′,2,2′-tetrahydro-1,1′-dimethoxy- | C42H64O2 | 52.9052 | 0.0880 ± 0.1 |
Chrysin (highlighted in bold) was one of the myco-components detected in the ethyl acetate total culture extract of C. globosum. The components were identified by comparing the spectrum of the unknown components with the spectrum of reported components in the National Institute Standard and Technology (NIST) library. The relative abundance of each component was calculated by comparing its average peak area to the total area contributed by all the components.
Figure 2Optimization of parameters for the extraction of cytotoxic secondary metabolites. (A) Growth curve analyses of C. globosum grown in potato dextrose broth for thirty-five days. Mycelial dry weight was calculated every seven days. (B) Evaluation of optimum incubation time interval for extraction of cytotoxic secondary metabolites from C. globosum, evaluated by MTT assay on A549 cells. Optimization of appropriate organic solvent for total extraction of cytotoxic metabolites from C. globosum by MTT assay on (C) MCF-7 and (D) A549 cells.
Figure 3Cytotoxic effect of CGEE on MCF-7 cells: (A) MCF-7 cells treated with a range of concentrations of CGEE for 24 h. The percentage of live and dead cells was evaluated by propidium iodide (PI) staining and quantified by FACS. 100 nm Paclitaxel treated cells served as positive control. (B) Effect of CGEE treatment on cell cycle phase distribution of MCF-7 cells after 24 h. The percentage of cells in each phase was evaluated by PI staining and quantified by FACS. CGEE induced G2/M phase arrest. (C) Evaluation of ROS level in response to 24 h of CGEE treatment in MCF-7 cells determined by DCFH-DA staining followed by FACS analysis. (D) Effect of 24 h of CGEE treatment on MMP dynamics in MCF-7 cells measured by JC-1 staining followed by FACS analysis. Flow cytometry data were quantified using the CytExpert 2.0 software. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4Purification and structure elucidation of compound Chrysin from CGEE. (A) Inset: TLC analysis of CGEE and standard Chrysin (SChr). Overlaid HPLC chromatograms of TLC spot (purified compound) at retention time 24.600 min, SChr showing a peak at retention time 24.687 min and CGEE showing a peak at retention time 24.387 min. The analysis was conducted on an Agilent C18 column using a mobile phase of 50% methanol (A) and 50% acetonitrile/water (B) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and absorbance was monitored at 310 nm wavelength. (B) Comparison of GC–MS analyses of TLC eluted spot and SChr. Single peaks were obtained for both the samples at retention time 26.170 for TLC eluted spot and 26.164 for SChr. Comparison of the FT-IR spectrum of (C) anticipated fungal chrysin (FChr) and (D) SChr indicating the presence of similar functional groups in both the compounds.
Figure 5LC–MS/MS analysis of CGEE (A): an intense peak at 25.5 min, MS and MS/MS analysis of that peak demonstrated a precursor ion at m/z 253.0529 [M−H]. FChr (B): single peak obtained at 25.4 min, MS and MS/MS analysis demonstrated precursor ion at m/z 253.0514 [M-H]. SChr (C): single peak obtained at 25.3 min, MS and MS/MS analysis demonstrated a precursor ion at 253.0517 [M−H] (D). Overlaid chromatograms of CGEE, FChr and SChr where dotted box indicates presence of chrysin at retention time ~ 25.5 min.
MS/MS fragments of precursor ions and their spectral matching scores with chrysin.
| Samples | Retention time (min) | Precursor [M−H] | MS/MS fragments | MetFrag Score | Metlin Score | Precursor ΔPPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGEE | 25.5 | 253.0529 | 119, 143, 167, 181, 209, 225, 253 | 1 | 100 | 9.08 |
| FChr | 25.4 | 253.0514 | 119,143,167,181,197,209, 225, 253 | 1 | 100 | 3.00 |
| SChr | 25.3 | 253.0517 | 119,143,167,181,197,209, 225,253 | 1 | 100 | 4.38 |
Figure 6The 1H NMR (A) and 13C NMR (B) spectra of fungal chrysin produced by the endophyte Chaetomium globosum.
Figure 7Evaluation of the cytotoxic activity of purified fungal chrysin (FChr) and standard chrysin (SChr) after 72 h of treatment at a range of concentrations ranging from 20 to 250 µM by MTT assay on (A) MCF-7 and (C) HEK 293 T cells. Dose response curve of FChr and SChr induced cytotoxicity in (B) MCF-7 cells and (D) HEK 293 T cells. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 8Validation of cytotoxic effects of purified FChr and SChr on MCF-7 cells: (A) The curves indicate the percentage of cell death in response to a range of concentrations of FChr and SChr after 72 h of treatment by PI staining followed by FACS analysis. (B) The bar diagram indicates the distribution of cells in the phases of the cell cycle in response to 72 h of FChr and (C) SChr treatment at a range of concentrations. Both the treatments induced G1 phase arrest in MCF-7 cells. (D) Effect of FChr and SChr on MMP dynamics in MCF-7 cells after 72 h. (E) Change in ROS levels in MCF-7 cells in response to 24 h of treatment of FChr and SChr. Flow cytometry data were quantified using the CytExpert 2.0 software. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 9FACS analysis of MCF-7 cells stained with Annexin-V FITC/PI after treatment with different doses of FChr for 72 h. Flow cytometry data were quantified using the CytExpert 2.0 software. Means sharing different letters differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.