| Literature DB >> 30123207 |
Madhuree Kumari1, Sidhartha Taritla1, Ankur Sharma1, C Jayabaskaran1.
Abstract
Endophytic fungi are now recognized as sources of pharmacologically beneficial, novel bioactive compounds. This study was carried out to evaluate antiproliferative and antioxidative potential of a seaweed endophytic fungus Talaromyces purpureogenus. Extracts with different solvents of the fungus grown on different liquid media were assayed for the antiproliferative and antioxidative activities. Tested 6 cancer cell lines, the highest antiproliferative activity was observed in ethyl acetate extract of total culture grown in Potato Dextrose Broth for 28 days in a dose-dependent manner. The highest antioxidative activity was observed in hexane extract of fungal culture grown in Malt Extract Broth for 21 days. Analyzed for secondary metabolites, the extract revealed the presence of phenolics, alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids and terpenoids. Further, Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (GCMS) analysis of the extract revealed the presence of several compounds including 3-nitropropanoic acid, 4H-pyran-4-one 5-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl), hexadecanoic acid, and octadecanoic acid, known to be cytotoxic or antioxidative. Among different cell lines tested, HeLa cells were the most vulnerable to the treatment of the fungal extract with an IC50 value of 101 ± 1 μg/mL. The extract showed no significant cytotoxicity to the normal human embryonic kidney cell line (HEK 293 T) in the MTT assay. The ethyl acetate extract induced membrane damage and mitochondrial depolarization and thereby apoptosis and cytotoxicity in HeLa cells. The study marks marine-derived endophytes as potential sources for discovery of novel drugs.Entities:
Keywords: Talaromyces; anticancer; antioxidative; apoptosis; endophytes; parameter optimization
Year: 2018 PMID: 30123207 PMCID: PMC6085570 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01777
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1(A) Time course of biomass production by T. purpureogenus in PDB culture medium. (B) Time course of cytotoxic secondary metabolites production by T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in PDB for indicated time period and the ethyl acetate extracts of the fungal culture were tested for cytotoxic activity against HeLa cell line by MTT assay. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 2Cytotoxic effects of different solvent extracts of T. purpureogenus against HeLa cell line by MTT assay. HeLa cells were treated with indicated concentration of different solvent extracts for 48 h. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 3(A) Production of biomass in different culture media. The fungus was grown in different media for 28 days and the biomass was harvested as described in methods. (B) Effect of different culture media on the production of cytotoxic secondary metabolites by T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in different media for 28 days and the ethyl acetate extracts (TPEE) were tested for cytotoxic activity. Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 4Effect of NaCl on the production of cytotoxic secondary metabolites by T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in PDB with different concentration of NaCl for 28 days and the ethyl acetate extracts (TPEE) were tested for cytotoxic activity. Values are the means ± SD of three replicates.
Quantification of metabolites present in ethyl acetate crude extract (TPEE) of T. purpureogenus by GCMS analysis.
| 1. | 1.518 | Urea | 2.948688 ± 0.1 |
| 2. | 1.578 | 3-Nitropropanoic acid | 1.323096 ± 0.1 |
| 3. | 1.668 | Propanoic acid | 1.671578 ± 0.03 |
| 4. | 1.743 | Ethanol, 2-nitro-, propionate (ester) | 1.590 ± 0.01 |
| 5. | 2.12 | 2-Pentene, 4-methyl-, (E)- | 0.543632 ± 0.003 |
| 6. | 2.315 | Butanamide, 3-methyl- | 0.556617 ± 0.002 |
| 7. | 2.722 | 1H-Pyrrole, 2-methyl- | 0.4712 ± 0.002 |
| 8. | 2.993 | Pyridine, 2,6-dimethyl | 0.11371 ± 0.004 |
| 9. | 3.324 | Dimethyl sulfone | 0.099665 ± 0.003 |
| 10. | 3.73 | 1-Butanol, 4-methoxy- | 0.208109 ± 0.008 |
| 11. | 6.243 | 3-Heptanone | 0.17252 ± 0.005 |
| 12. | 7.688 | 4-Methyl-2-oxo-(1H)-pyrimidine | 0.398271 ± 0.001 |
| 13. | 8.425 | 2-Hydroxy-5,5-dimethyl-hex-2-en-4-one | 0.24555 ± 0.004 |
| 14. | 10.095 | 1H-Pyrazole, 4,5-dihydro-5,5-dimethyl-4-isopropylidene- | 0.068606 ± 0.06 |
| 15. | 10.366 | 1H-Pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, 1-methyl- | 0.209602 ± 0.05 |
| 16. | 14.791 | Ethanone, 1-(1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-2-yl)- | 3.263856 ± 0.01 |
| 17. | 15.588 | Ethanol, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)- | 2.517 ± 0.01 |
| 18. | 21.954 | Ethanol, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)-, acetate | 0.517581 ± 0.01 |
| 19. | 22.992 | 1-Dodecene | 0.8309 ± 0.01 |
| 20. | 22.917 | Phthalic acid, isobutyl 4-octyl ester | 0.423226 ± 0.02 |
| 21. | 23.73 | Indolizine, 3,5-dimethyl- | 0.356049 ± 0.008 |
| 22. | 25.761 | 4H-Pyran-4-one, 5-hydroxy-2-(hydroxymethyl)- | 1.080993 ± 0.02 |
| 23. | 31.42 | Phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- | 0.395202 ± 0.008 |
| 24. | 37.876 | Dodecanoic acid | 0.254661 ± 0.005 |
| 25. | 39.876 | 2-Piperidin-1-yl-6,7-dihydro-oxazolo[3,2-a][1,3,5]triazin-4-one | 0.152266 ± 0.001 |
| 26. | 40.72 | Diethyl Phthalate | 0.109352 ± 0.004 |
| 27. | 40.885 | 3-Hexadecene, (Z)- | 2.621673 ± 0.06 |
| 28. | 41.999 | Hexadecane | 0.202634 ± 0.05 |
| 29. | 42.797 | Pentadecane, 1-methoxy-13-methyl- | 0.140488 ± 0.004 |
| 30. | 44.00 | Benzophenone | 0.330142 ± 0.002 |
| 31. | 44.407 | Pentadecane, 1-methoxy-13-methyl- | 0.215737 ± 0.004 |
| 32. | 46.228 | Benzaldehyde, 4-(diethylamino)- | 0.133138 ± 0.002 |
| 33. | 46.273 | Indole-2-one, 2,3-dihydro-5-hydroxy-1,3-dimethyl- | 0.231377 ± 0.004 |
| 34. | 54.339 | 2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 3,5,7-trihydroxy- | 1.684954 ± 0.03 |
| 35. | 61.547 | Phenol, 4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)- | 5.506252 ± 0.01 |
| 36. | 64.587 | 2-(1-Hydroxyethyl) hydroxymethyl benzene | 1.485532 ± 0.03 |
| 37. | 66.062 | Tricyclo [3.3.1.1(3,7)] decanone, 4-iodo-, (1α,3β,4α,5α,7β)- | 1.994276 ± 0.04 |
| 38. | 66.859 | 1,4-Benzenediol, 2,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)- | 0.244313 ± 0.005 |
| 39. | 72.909 | 4′-Propoxy-2-methylpropiophenone | 0.977758 ± 0.02 |
| 40. | 77.213 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 1.611505 ± 0.03 |
| 41. | 86.243 | Tetradecanoic acid | 0.42833 ± 0.008 |
| 42. | 94.007 | E-15-Heptadecenal | 5.25804 ± 0.1 |
| 43. | 97.108 | Dibutyl phthalate | 11.30445 ± 0.23 |
| 44. | 100.208 | 4a, trans-8a-Perhydro-cis-2-(2-hydroxy-2-propyl)-4a,cis-8-dimethylnaphthalene | 2.342847 ± 0.004 |
| 45. | 126.408 | 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-methylpropyl) ester | 0.285096 ± 0.005 |
| 46. | 138.311 | 9-Eicosene, (E)- | 0.46629 ± 0.009 |
| 47. | 143.274 | 2-Methyl-7-nonadecene | 0.313766 ± 0.006 |
| 48. | 147.05 | Vinylbital | 0.08709 ± 0.001 |
| 49. | 155.256 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 16.37683 ± 0.339 |
| 50. | 156.008 | Behenic alcohol | 9.531588 ± 0.19 |
| 51. | 156.881 | 7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro (4,5) deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione | 1.14348 ± 0.02 |
| 52. | 157.649 | Phthalic acid, butyl ester, ester with butyl glycolate | 0.0797 ± 0.001 |
| 53. | 158.582 | Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 0.101213 ± 0.002 |
| 54. | 161.787 | Eicosane | 1.168244 ± 0.02 |
| 55. | 168.574 | 2-Methyl-7-nonadecene | 0.343921 ± 0.007 |
| 56. | 168.584 | 3-Eicosene, (E)- | 0.76107 ± 0.01 |
| 57. | 169.573 | Benzenepropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, methyl ester | 0.110915 ± 0.002 |
| 58. | 180.237 | Hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 0.079235 ± 0.02 |
| 59. | 198.175 | Dibutyl phthalate | 9.696606 ± 0.08 |
| 60. | 212.562 | Octadecanoic acid | 4.1082 ± 0.08 |
| 61. | 213.434 | 1-Docosene | 0.54764 ± 0.01 |
Values are the means ± SD of three independent experiments.
Figure 5Inhibition of cell growth and induction of apoptotic cell death by the fungal extract. (A) Inhibition of cell growth by the TPEE on various cancer cell lines. Cells were treated with indicated concentrations of the extract for 48 h and the inhibitory effects of the extract on cell growth was determined by assessing the cell viability using MTT assay. (B) Fungal extract induced cell death in HeLa cells. Hela cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of TPEE for 48 h, stained with PI and subjected to flow cytometry analysis to evaluate live and dead population. (C) Induction of apoptotic nuclear morphology by TPEE. HeLa cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of the extract and stained with AO/PI dual staining. V, viable cells; CC, chromatin condensation; BL, membrane blebbing; LA, late apoptotic cells. (D) Induction of loss of mitochondrial membrane potential by the extract. Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of TPEE for 48 h and subsequently analyzed for change in mitochondrial membrane potential by JC-1 using flow cytometry. 4-DNP treated cells served as positive control. (E) Induction of ROS potential by TPEE. Cells were treated with indicated concentrations of the extract for 24 h and stained with DCFH-DA and intracellular ROS was monitored by flow cytometry. Values are the means ± SD of three replicates. Means sharing different alphabets “a,” “b” differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 6Production of antioxidant secondary metabolites by T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in various culture media for different time period and organic extracts of the total fungal culture were tested for their potential antioxidative activity (IC50 values) by DPPH radical scavenging assay. (A) Time course of DPPH scavenging of fungal crude extract of T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in PDB for indicated time period and the ethyl acetate extract was tested for antioxidative activity. (B) In vitro DPPH scavenging activity of different solvent extracts of T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in PDB for 21 days and different solvent extracts were tested for antioxidative activity. (C) Effect of different culture media on the production of antioxidative secondary metabolites by T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in different media for 21 days and the hexane extracts (TPHE) were tested for antioxidative activity. (D) Effect of NaCl on the production of antioxidant secondary metabolites by T. purpureogenus. The fungus was grown in MEB with different concentration of NaCl for 21 days and the hexane extracts (TPHE) were tested for antioxidative activity. Values are the means of three replicates ± SD of three replicates. Means sharing different alphabets “a,” “b” differ significantly from each other at p ≤ 0.05.