| Literature DB >> 33126420 |
Chang-Kwon Kim1, Dongdong Wang1, Brice A P Wilson1, Josep Saurí2, Donna Voeller3, Stanley Lipkowitz3, Barry R O'Keefe1,4, Kirk R Gustafson1.
Abstract
Three new aryl alkaloids named suberitamides A-C (1-3), were isolated from an extract of the marine sponge Pseudosuberites sp. collected along the coast of North Carolina. Their planar structures were established by extensive nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. To assign the challenging relative configuration of the saturated five-membered ring in suberitamide A (1), a simple and efficient NMR protocol was applied that is based on the analysis of 2- and 3-bond 1H-13C spin-spin coupling constants using a PIP (pure in-phase) HSQMBC (heteronuclear single quantum multiple bond correlation) IPAP (in-phase and anti-phase) experiment. Suberitamides A (1) and B (2) inhibited Cbl-b, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is an important modulator of immune cell function, with IC50 values of approximately 11 μM.Entities:
Keywords: Cbl-b ubiquitin ligase inhibition; PIP HSQMBC IPAP; Pseudosuberites sp.; marine sponge; suberitamides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33126420 PMCID: PMC7693676 DOI: 10.3390/md18110536
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of suberitamides A–C (1–3).
13C NMR (150 MHz) and 1H NMR (600 MHz) Data for Suberitamide A (1).
| Position | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 109.1 C | 110.9 C | ||
| 2-OCH3 | 51.6, CH3 | 3.40, s | 52.6, CH3 | 3.52, s |
| 3 | 53.3, CH | 4.09, d (13.8) | 55.4, CH | 4.22, d (13.8) |
| 4 | 54.6, CH | 3.91, d (13.8) | 56.3, CH | 4.04, d (13.8) |
| 5 | 102.3 C | 103.8 C | ||
| 5-OH | 7.40, s | |||
| 6 | 169.4, s | 171.6, s | ||
| 7-NH | 10.52, d (10.2) | |||
| 8 | 120.2, CH | 7.29, dd (14.6, 10.2) | 120.7, CH | 7.37, d (14.6) |
| 9 | 114.8, CH | 6.43, d (14.6) | 117.2, CH | 6.40, d (14.6) |
| 10 | 126.9, C | 128.9, C | ||
| 11, 15 | 126.8, CH | 7.24, d (8.4) | 128.0, CH | 7.25, d (8.4) |
| 12, 14 | 115.6, CH | 6.72, d (8.4) | 116.6, CH | 6.75, d (8.4) |
| 13 | 156.4, C | 157.8, C | ||
| 13-OH | 9.47, s | |||
| 16 | 166.0, C | 168.6, C | ||
| 17-NH | 10.50, d (10.2) | |||
| 18 | 120.1, CH | 7.04, dd (14.6, 10.2) | 120.5, CH | 7.10, d (14.6) |
| 19 | 114.3, CH | 6.29, d (14.6) | 117.1, CH | 6.35, d (14.6) |
| 20 | 126.9, C | 128.8, C | ||
| 21, 25 | 126.7, CH | 7.18, d (8.4) | 128.0, CH | 7.20, d (8.4) |
| 22, 24 | 115.6, CH | 6.70, d (8.4) | 116.5, CH | 6.73, d (8.4) |
| 156.3, C | 157.7, C | |||
| 23-OH | 9.44, s | |||
| 26 | 124.8, C | 126.5, C | ||
| 27 | 115.8, CH | 6.52, d (1.8) | 116.7, CH | 6.66, d (1.8) |
| 28 | 144.4, C | 146.1, C | ||
| 28-OH | 8.71, s | |||
| 29 | 144.5, C | 145.8, C | ||
| 29-OH | 8.74, s | |||
| 30 | 115.0, CH | 6.50, d (8.4) | 115.9, CH | 6.60, d (8.4) |
| 31 | 119.2, CH | 6.36, dd (8.4, 1.8) | 121.2, CH | 6.54, dd (8.4, 1.8) |
| 32 | 125.0, C | 126.6, C | ||
| 33 | 116.6, CH | 6.55, d (1.8) | 117.5, CH | 6.69, d (1.8) |
| 34 | 144.7, C | 145.7, C | ||
| 34-OH | 8.68, s | |||
| 35 | 144.6, C | 145.9, C | ||
| 35-OH | 8.69, s | |||
| 36 | 115.2, CH | 6.51, d (8.4) | 116.2, CH | 6.61, d (8.4) |
| 37 | 120.1, CH | 6.38, dd (8.4, 1.8) | 122.1, CH | 6.52, dd (8.4, 1.8) |
NMR spectra were acquired in a DMSO-d6 and CD3OD, respectively.
Figure 2Selected 2D NMR correlations for suberitamide A (1). HMBC (heteronuclear multiple bond correlation) experiments were optimized for JCH = 8.0 Hz (blue arrows, measured in DMSO-d6) or JCH = 2.0 Hz (red arrows, measured in CD3OD).
Figure 3(A) Selective 1D ROESY correlations around the five-membered ring in 1. (B) calculated proton–proton coupling when the H-3/H-4 dihedral angle is 180°. (C) 8.0 Hz optimized PIP-HSQMBC IPAP (pure in-phase heteronuclear single quantum multiple bond correlation in-phase and anti-phase) spectra were acquired. The in-phase plus anti-phase (IP + AP) and in-phase minus anti-phase (IP − AP) datasets were processed and corresponding 1D slices (blue, IP + AP; red, IP − AP) were overlaid at the C-3, C-4, C-6, and C-16 carbon chemical shifts. (D) flow chart to use 3JC,H values for configurational analysis of five-membered oxolane ring (NSI: no stereochemical information can be extracted) [14,15].
13C NMR (150 MHz) and 1H NMR (600 MHz) Data for suberitamides B (2) and C (3) in CD3OD.
| 2 | 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | ||||
| 2, 5 | 127.9, C | 197.2, C | ||
| 3, 4 | 127.8, C | 55.5, CH | 5.15, s | |
| 6, 16 | 161.1, C | 159.3, C | ||
| 8, 18 | 120.5, CH | 7.27, d (14.6) | 120.0, CH | 7.14, d (14.6) |
| 9, 19 | 115.6, CH | 5.71, d (14.6) | 118.6, CH | 6.42, d (14.6) |
| 10, 20 | 128.8, C | 128.7, C | ||
| 11,15,21,25 | 127.8, CH | 7.11, d (8.4) | 128.1, CH | 7.18, d (8.4) |
| 12,14,22,24 | 116.5, CH | 6.69, d (8.4) | 116.5, CH | 6.70, d (8.4) |
| 13, 23 | 157.7, C | 158.1, C | ||
| 26, 32 | 126.3, C | 125.8, C | ||
| 27, 33 | 118.6, CH | 6.61, d (1.8) | 117.7, CH | 6.53, d (1.6) |
| 28, 34 | 146.3, C | 146.5, C | ||
| 29, 35 | 145.9, C | 146.1, C | ||
| 30, 36 | 116.4, CH | 6.74, d (8.4) | 116.5, CH | 6.60, d (8.4) |
| 31, 37 | 123.2, CH | 6.53, dd (8.4, 1.8) | 122.1, CH | 6.42, dd (8.4, 1.6) |
| 38 | 49.3, CH2 | 4.69, br t (7.6) | ||
| 39 | 38.7, CH2 | 2.99, br t (7.6) | ||
| 40 | 130.5, C | |||
| 41, 45 | 131.2, CH | 6.99, d (8.4) | ||
| 42, 44 | 116.2, CH | 6.68, d (8.4) | ||
| 43 | 157.2, C | |||
Figure 4Selected 2D NMR correlations for suberitamides B (2) and C (3).
Figure 5Dose-response curves of Cbl-b inhibitory activity for suberitamides A–C (1–3).