| Literature DB >> 28955767 |
J Santhoshkumar1, S Rajeshkumar1, S Venkat Kumar1.
Abstract
Nanotechnology is the formation, running and use of operation at the nanomaterial size scale (1-100 nm). Nanoscale materials can also be obtained by biological synthesis materials via eco-friendly green chemistry based technique. Current development and numerous strategies involved in the green synthesis of nanoparticles were focussed. This review mainly focused on plants which include scientific name, family name, common name, plant parts, its characterization, size and shape of the nanoparticles. Plant extract which was done experimentally gives its various characterization which leads to the identification of compounds of different nano size and shape. Biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles is in different shapes like spherical, rod, cubic, triangle and also in different sizes. Various application and importance of gold nanoparticles in numerous fields were discussed. The mark of the review is to provide an overview of recent learning in biosynthesized nanoparticles, its characterization and their potential applications.Entities:
Keywords: Characterization; Gold nanoparticles; Plant; Synthesis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28955767 PMCID: PMC5614687 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.06.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Fig. 1Reactions involved in green synthesis of nanoparticles and its application.
Fig. 2Synthesis and different characterization.
Leaf mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| 1. | Scrophulariaceae | Valaarai | UV–vis spectro- photometer, TEM, FTIR, TGA, XRD | 3–45 | Spherical | ||
| 2. | Combretaceae | Country-almond | UV-Vis spectroscopy, XRD, FTIR,TEM | 10–35 | Spherical | ||
| 3. | Lamiaceae | – | TEM-SEAD, SEM-EDAX, XRD, Zeta potential, DLS, and FT-IR | 11 | Spherical | ||
| 4. | Oleaceae | Sweet oil | UV–Vis spec, photoluminescence, TEM, XRD, FTIR | 50 to 100 | Triangular, hexagonal and spherical | ||
| 5. | Anacardiaceae | Mango | UV–vis, TEM, XRD. | ∼ 20 | Spherical | ||
| 6. | Cupressaceae | Biota | AGE, TEM, DGC | 2–70 | Spherical and triangular | ||
| 7. | Malvaceae | Thuthi | UV-visible Spectroscopy, TEM, GC-MS and FTIR, ZETA | 1–20 | Spherical | ||
| 8. | Fabaceae | Parasu | UV visible spectroscopy, XRD, TEM, DLS, FTIR | 20–80 | Large spherical | ||
| 9. | Amaranthaceae | Seepweeds | SEM, EDAX, TEM, XRD, FT-IR, DLS | 14.5 | Spherical and rarely triangular | ||
| 10. | Convolvulaceae | Pink morning glory | UV–Vis spectra, SEM, TEM, EDAX, XRD, FT-IR, | 25–100 | Triangular, hexagonal, pentagonal, rod and truncated | ||
| 11. | Geraniaceae | Cranesbills | UV–Visible, TEM, STEM, HAADF, EDS, FTIR | 12 ± 3 | – | ||
| 12. | Arecaceae | Date palm | UV–vis spectra, TEM FTIR | 32 and 45 | Spherical | ||
| 13. | Fabaceae | Agati | SPR, TEM, AFM, SEM, EDX. FTIR | 34.11 | Spherical | ||
| 14. | Salicaceae | Willow | UV–Vis spectrophotometer, AFM, SEM, FTIR | 50–80 | Non-spherical | ||
| 15. | Magnoliaceaeand Ebenaceae | Kobus Magnolia and Ebony | ICP, EDS, SEM, TEM, AFM, XPS, FTIR | 5–300 | Spherical structures | ||
| 16. | Cupressaceae | Chinese arborvitae | UV–Vis spectroscopy, TEM, EDX, SAED, FTIR, | 2.2 to 42.8 | Spherical | ||
| 17. | Cinnamomum verum | Cinnamon | UV–vis, TEM, XRD, FTIR, | 25 | Spherical | ||
| 18. | Apiaceae | Coriander | UV-vis, XRD,EDAX, FTIR, TEM. | 6.75 to 57.91 | Spherical,Triangle, truncated triangles and decahedral | ||
| 19. | Apocynaceae | Oleander | HRTEM, SEM, XRD, FT-IR | 2–10 | Spherical | ||
| 20. | Euphorbiaceae | Pill-bearing spurge | TEM, XRD, EDAX, AFM | 50 | Spherical | ||
| 21. | Combretaceae | Arjuna | UV–visible, FTIR, XRD, TEM, AFM | 20 to 50 | Cubic, Spherical | ||
| 22. | Malvaceae | Hibiscus | UV–vis spectroscopy, XRD, FTIR, and XPS, TEM | 10–60 | Spherical | ||
| 23. | Fabaceae | Sensitive plant | UV–vis, FT-IR, XRD, HR-TEM, | 12.5 | Spherical | ||
| 24. | Papaveraceae | Mexican poppy | UV- Vis, XRD and SEM. | 22–26 | Spherical | ||
| 25. | Lamiaceae | Vernacular | UV−vis-NIR, TEM, GC−MS, HRTEM and SAED | 10–300 | Disk,coral shape | ||
| 26. | Meliaceae | Neem | TEM, DLS, SEM, FTIR, XRD, UV-vis near-infrared spectra | 15–18 | Isomorphic spherical | ||
| 27. | Asteraceae | Milk thistle | – | – | – | ||
| 28. | Moraceae | Banyan | UV-Spec, FTIR, TEM, XRD, SPR, | 2 nm to 100 | Spherical | ||
| 29. | Ebenaceae | Diospyros | UV-VIS spectroscopy, FT-IR, SEM | 70 – 90 | – | ||
| 30. | Fabaceae | Yellow | UV-Visible Spectrophotometer, FTIR, FESEM, EDAX, HR-TEM, XRD | 31.32 | Crystalline | ||
| 31. | Nyctaginaceae | Paper flower | UV-visible spectral, FTIR, | – | – | ||
| 32. | Costaceae | Spiral flag | UV-Vis Spectroscopy, SEM | 54–62 | Spherical | ||
| 33. | Aloe perfoliata | Asphodelaceae | Barbados aloe | UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy, TEM, and FTIR, AFM, EDAX | 50–350 | Spherical | |
| 34. | Magnoliaceae | Kobus magnolia | UV-visible absorption, EIS, Cyclic voltammograms, SEM | 100 to 300 | Plate and spherical | ||
| 35. | Malvaceae | China rose | UV–vis spectroscopy, TEM, FTIR | 16–30 | Spherical | ||
| 36. | Nepenthaceae | Ksete-phare | TEM, SEM, FT-IR, UV-VIS and XRD | 50 nm to 80 | Triangular and spherical | ||
| 37. | Acanthaceae | Lasia spinosa | XRD, SEM-EDAX, DLS, FT-IR and UV-spectroscopy | 50 nm to 80 | Triangular and spherical shape | ||
| 38. | Amaranthaceae | Spiny pigweed | UV-Vis, TEM, XRD, FT-IR, EDX, | 10.74 | Spherical, few triangular | ||
| 39. | Vitaceae | Grape | UV–visible spectra, TEM, XRD, FTIR | 10–17 | Spherical | ||
| 40. | Meliaceae,Geraniaceae | Neem, murray red gum, | EDS spectra, UV/Vis spectrum, TEM | 1.25 – 17.5 and 2.5 – 27.5 with an average size of 5.5 and 7.5 | – | ||
| 41. | Lamiaceae | Peppermint, lemon balm, garden sage | UV–Vis absorption, DLS, SEM, TEM | – | – | ||
| 42. | Fabaceae | Chick pea | UV-Vis spectra, TEM, SEM | 30 to 80 | Spherical, pentagonal and triangle shape | ||
| 43. | Fabaceae | Tamarind | UV visible Spectroscopy, GC/MS, HPLC, SEM, EDX, FTIR | 52 | Spherical sizes | ||
| 44. | Fabaceae | Indian coral tree | UV- Vis,FTIR, XRD, EDX, SEM and TEM | 20–50 | Cubical | ||
| 45. | Apocynaceae | Gymnema | UV-vis, SEM, EDAX, FTIR, XRD | 72.8 | Spherical |
Fruit mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| Rutaceae | Pomelo | TEM, DLS, SEM, XRD, FTIR, UV–vis spectroscopy, | 25.7±10 | Rod and spherical | |||
| Rutaceae | Sweet orange | UV–visible spectra, TEM, XRD, SAED | 15–80 | Spherical | |||
| Rubiaceae | Genipapo | ESI-MS, TEM, SAED, FTIR, XRD | 15–40 | Spherical | |||
| Oxalidaceae | Bilimbi | UV-Vis, FTIR, EDX,SEM, SPR | 75 to 150 | Rhomboidal | |||
| Meliaceae | Duku | UV-Vis spectroscopy, FTIR, TEM | 20–40 | Triangular and hexagonal | |||
| Pomegranate | Punicaceae, | UV, IR, TEM | 70 | – | |||
| Clusiaceae | Brindall Berry | UV–Visible, HRTEM, XRD, FTIR, | 17 | Hexagonal and spherical | |||
| Lecythidaceae | Kanuunankuulapuu | UV–Visible and FTIR, TEM and XRD, DLS and Zeta potential analysis, | 25 ± 6 | Spherical, triangular and hexagonal | |||
| Combretaceae | Arjuna | UV–visible, FT-IR, XRD, TEM, EDAX, HPLC | Ta1 (60), Ta3 (20), Ta5(14) | Pentagon | |||
| Zygophyllaceae | – | UV-VIS, FESEM | 30 and 40 | Circle |
Flower mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| 1. | Rubiaceae | Jungle geranium | UV- visible spectra, TEM | 5–10 | Spherical | ||
| 2. | Caesalpiniaceae | Avaram | UV–vis spectrum, EDAX, HRSEM, HRTEM, FTIR | 12–41 | Spherical | ||
| 3. | Asteraceae | Marigold | UV-visible, HRTEM | 30 −50 | Spherical | ||
| 4. | Moringaceae | Moringa | UV–vis, TEM, DLS, SEM and EDX | 3–5 | Spherical | ||
| 5. | Oleaceae | Night Jasmine | UV–Vis, TEM, XRD, FTIR, XRD | 19.8 ± 5.0 | Spherical | ||
| 6. | Rosaceae | Wild black cherry | UV- Vis Spectroscopy, XRD, TEM, SEM, FTIR | 10 to 20 | Spherical | ||
| 7. | Lecythidaceae | Cannon ball tree | UV–Visible, FR-IR, SEM, TEM | 25–45 | Spherical | ||
| 8. | Leguminosae | Butterfly tree | UV- Vis, XRD, FTIR EDX, SEM and TEM. | 20 – 50 | Cubic | ||
| 9. | Apocynaceae | Rubra | UV-Visible Spectro photometer, HRTEM, | 20–30 | Spherical | ||
| 10. | Thymelaeaceae | Datpadi | UV-vis spectra, XRD,TEM and HRTEM, EDS, FTIR | 5 to 20 | Spherical |
Root mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| 1. | Lamiaceae | UV–Vis spectroscopy, HRTEM, | 5–18 | Nano rods | |||
| 2. | Convolvulaceae | pink morning glory | UV–Vis spectra, SEM, TEM, EDAX, XRD, FT-IR, | 25–100 | Triangular, hexagonal, pentagonal, rod and truncated | ||
| 3. | Rubiaceae | morinda | UV–vis spectroscopy, XRD, FTIR, FE-SEM, EDX and TEM | 12.17–38.26 | Spherical, triangle and Hexagonal | ||
| 4. | Poaceae | zaina | SEM, AFM, UV–Vis spectroscopy, XRD | 14.28 | Spherical Shape |
Seed-mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| 1. | Leguminosae – Pea | Pigeon pea | UV–Vis spectra, FTIR, XRD, TEM, SEM | 9 to 41 | Spherical | ||
| 2. | Zingiberaceae | Kardemumma | UV-Vis, SPR, XRD. | 432.3 | Spherical | ||
| 3. | Cucurbitaceae | Pumpkin | UV-vis spectroscopy, TEM, DLS | 600–800 | Triangular | ||
| 4. | Malvaceae | Lady's fingers | UV–visible spectroscopy, XRD, FTIR, AFM, FESEM and EDX | 45–75 | Spherical and narrow | ||
| 5. | Vitaceae | Grape | UV–visible spectra, TEM, XRD, FTIR | 10–17 | Spherical |
Bark mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles.
| 1. | Fabaceae | Golden rain tre | FTIR, UV−650 spectrophotometer, FTIR, SEM | 55.2–98.4 | – | ||
| 2. | Eucommiaceae | Hardy rubber tree | UV–Visible spectroscopy, HRTEM, EDX, XRD, RA-FTIR | 16.4 | Spherical | ||
| 3. | Fabaceae | Prickly acacia | UV–vis, FT-IR, XRD, TEM, | 10–50 | Quasi-spherical | ||
| 4. | Moraceae | Peepal tree | UV-Vis, XRD, TEM and FTIR | 20–30 | Triangle,Pentagon's and hexagons | ||
| 5. | Araceae | Arum | UV–visible spectroscopy, EDAX, SEM, TEM | 2–40 | Spherical | ||
| 6. | Guttiferae | St. John's wort | UV-Vis, XRD, FESEM, | S1−10–70, S2−10–50 | Spherical shape |