Literature DB >> 33106611

The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience part 1-comfort and satisfaction.

Yinon Shapira1, Emma Worrell2, Andre S Litwin3, Raman Malhotra3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report associations with comfort and with appearance satisfaction in artificial eye wearers.
METHODS: Multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study, nationwide within the National Health Service England. The National Artificial Eye Questionnaire (NAEQ) was completed by 951 respondents. Multiple regressions assessed associations between the experiences of artificial eye wearers, routine management, changes over time, baseline and demographic parameters and their reported comfort, satisfaction with appearance and prosthesis motility.
RESULTS: Better comfort levels were associated with needing less lubrication (β = 0.24, p < 0.001), older age (β = 0.17, p = 0.014), less discharge (β = 0.16, p < 0.001), less frequent cleaning (β = 0.16, p = 0.043), and male gender (β = 0.06, p = 0.047). Greater satisfaction with the appearance of the artificial eye was associated with better perceived motility (β = 0.57, p < 0.001). Black ethnic origin predicted a lower satisfaction with the appearance (β = -0.17, p = 0.001). Greater satisfaction with the motility was associated with a better appearance rating (β = 0.51, p < 0.001), longer time of having an artificial eye (β = 0.13, p < 0.001), older age (β = 0.11, p = 0.042), and a shorter adjustment time (β = -0.07, p = 0.016). Of the testimonials concerning appearance aspects, the majority (21/45, 46.7%) were related to the effect on social interactions.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that more attention should be given to the "dry anophthalmic socket syndrome" as a key cause of discomfort. Young patients are concerned particularly about the motility of the artificial eye. Over time satisfaction with the artificial eye movement is likely to improve.
© 2020. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33106611      PMCID: PMC8302585          DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-01236-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   4.456


  32 in total

1.  Survey of Ocular Prosthetics Rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, Part 1: Anophthalmic Patients' Aetiology, Opinions, and Attitudes.

Authors:  Muhanad M Hatamleh; Mojgan Abbariki; Noor Alqudah; Anne E Cook
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 2.  Recommendations for post-adaption care of an ocular prosthesis: A review.

Authors:  Sergio Bonaque-González; Alfredo Amigó; Cecilia Rodríguez-Luna
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  An investigation into discharge, visual perception, and appearance concerns of prosthetic eye wearers.

Authors:  Nicola S Pine; Ian de Terte; Keith R Pine
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2017-08-16

4.  Health-related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients in Korea.

Authors:  Ji Min Ahn; Sang Yeul Lee; Jin Sook Yoon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Survey of Ocular Prosthetics Rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, Part 2: Anophthalmic Patients' Satisfaction and Acceptance.

Authors:  Muhanad M Hatamleh; Ahmad A Alnazzawi; Mojgan Abbariki; Noor Alqudah; Anne E Cook
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes.

Authors:  Keith Pine; Brian Sloan; Joanna Stewart; Robert J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  A proposed model of the response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear and its application to the management of mucoid discharge.

Authors:  Keith R Pine; Brian H Sloan; Robert J Jacobs
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 8.  Acquired Monocular Vision Rehabilitation program.

Authors:  Carolyn Ihrig; Daniel P Schaefer
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2007

9.  Living with an artificial eye-the emotional and psychosocial impact.

Authors:  Edward Saxby; Rhys Davies; Jan Kerr
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge.

Authors:  Keith Pine; Brian Sloan; Joanna Stewart; Robert J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving the quality of life of patients undergoing enucleation.

Authors:  Bertil Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.456

2.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire Study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience Part 2 - visual function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.