Literature DB >> 23660132

A proposed model of the response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear and its application to the management of mucoid discharge.

Keith R Pine1, Brian H Sloan, Robert J Jacobs.   

Abstract

Mucoid discharge associated with prosthetic eye wear can be a distressing condition that affects the quality of life of people who have lost an eye. Discharge is the second highest concern of experienced prosthetic eye wearers after health of the companion eye and is prevalent in anophthalmic populations. Specific causes of mucoid discharge such as infections and environmental allergens are well understood, but non-specific causes are unknown and an evidence based protocol for managing non-specific discharge is lacking. Current management is based on prosthesis removal and cleaning, and professional re-polishing of the prosthesis. Tear protein deposits accumulate on prosthetic eyes. These deposits mediate the response of the socket to prosthetic eye wear and their influence (good and bad) is determined by differing cleaning regimes and standards of surface finish. This paper proposes a three-phase model that describes the response of the socket to prosthetic eye wear. The phases are: An initial period of wear of a new (or newly-polished) prosthesis when homeostasis is being established (or re-established) within the socket; a second period (equilibrium phase) where beneficial surface deposits have built up on the prosthesis and wear is safe and comfortable, and a third period (breakdown phase) where there is an increasing likelihood of harm from continued wear. The proposed model provides a rationale for a personal cleaning regime to manage non-specific mucoid discharge. Professional care of prosthetic eyes is also important for the management of discharge and evidence for effective surface finishing is reported in this study. Taken together, the proposed regimes for personal and professional care comprise a protocol for managing discharge associated with prosthetic eye wear. The protocol describes prosthetic eye cleaning methods and frequency, and suggests minimum standards for professional polishing. If confirmed, the protocol has the potential to resolve the current varied and contradictory opinions about the management of discharge, and to clarify advice given to patients about how to personally care for their prosthetic eyes.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23660132     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2013.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications].

Authors:  K R Koch; W Trester; N Müller-Uri; M Trester; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers.

Authors:  Alexander C Rokohl; Konrad R Koch; Werner Adler; Marc Trester; Wolfgang Trester; Nicola S Pine; Keith R Pine; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Evaluation of Different Polymerisation Methods of Ocular Prosthesis Acrylic Resins on Subcutaneous Tissue Inflammatory Response in Rats.

Authors:  Emily V F da Silva; Marcelo C Goiato; Sandro B Bitencourt; Victor G B Brito; Aline S Takamyia; Paulo A Penitente; Sandra H P de Oliveira; Daniela M Dos Santos
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Prosthetic rehabilitation of an ocular defect with post-enucleation socket syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Pokpong Amornvit; Dinesh Rokaya; Binit Shrestha; Theerathavaj Srithavaj
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2014-01-07

5.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience part 1-comfort and satisfaction.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.456

6.  A comparative assessment of prosthetic outcome on enucleation and evisceration in three different etiological eye defects: A case series.

Authors:  Nafij Bin Jamayet; John Kariuki Kirangi; Adam Husein; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

7.  Anxiety and depression in patients wearing prosthetic eyes.

Authors:  Ludwig M Heindl; Marc Trester; Yongwei Guo; Florian Zwiener; Narges Sadat; Nicola S Pine; Keith R Pine; Andreas Traweger; Alexander C Rokohl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Dry anophthalmic socket syndrome - morphological alterations in meibomian glands.

Authors:  Alexander C Rokohl; Marc Trester; Parsa Naderi; Niklas Loreck; Sarah Zwingelberg; Franziska Bucher; Keith R Pine; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.