Literature DB >> 20662844

Concerns of anophthalmic patients wearing artificial eyes.

Keith Pine1, Brian Sloan, Joanna Stewart, Robert J Jacobs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To identify the concerns of experienced artificial eye wearers and investigate whether these had changed since they lost their eye.
DESIGN: A retrospective study of private practice patients. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-three experienced artificial eye wearers.
METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was posted to participants. Paired Wilcoxon tests were used to investigate changes to concern levels over time. Ordinal logistic regression was used to investigate associations of demographic variables with concern levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in level of concern over time.
RESULTS: At the time of initial eye loss, participants were mainly concerned about the health of their remaining eye, coping with monocularity and receiving good advice. Between initial eye loss and the present, reductions in concern occurred with judging distance, peripheral vision, appearance, receiving good advice, comfort, retention, colour and movement of the artificial eye, fullness of orbit, loss of balance and postoperative pain. Patients whose jobs involved the public were more concerned about appearance and reduced visual range than those in other occupations. Participants' chief present-day concerns were health of the remaining eye and watering, crusting and discharge. All results above had a probability <0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: The study emphasized patients' concerns about the health of their remaining eye and their need for good advice at time of eye loss. Knowledge that their initial concerns about judging distance, reduced peripheral vision and appearance all decrease over time may help clinicians in counselling these patients. Watering, crusting and discharge was the chief present-day concern after health of the remaining eye.
© 2010 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology © 2010 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20662844     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02381.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1442-6404            Impact factor:   4.207


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications].

Authors:  K R Koch; W Trester; N Müller-Uri; M Trester; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Cryolite glass ocular prostheses and coralline hydroxyapatite implants for eye replacement following enucleation].

Authors:  A C Rokohl; K R Koch; M Trester; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers.

Authors:  Alexander C Rokohl; Konrad R Koch; Werner Adler; Marc Trester; Wolfgang Trester; Nicola S Pine; Keith R Pine; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Study of conjunctival flora in anophthalmic patients: influence on the comfort of the socket.

Authors:  Alvaro Toribio; Teresa Marrodán; Isabel Fernández-Natal; Honorina Martínez-Blanco; Leandro Rodríguez-Aparicio; Miguel Á Ferrero
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Short-term effects of topical cyclosporine A 0.05% (Restasis) in long-standing prosthetic eye wearers: a pilot study.

Authors:  J W Han; J S Yoon; S Y Jang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Effect of topical loteprednol etabonate with lid hygiene on tear cytokines and meibomian gland dysfunction in prosthetic eye wearers.

Authors:  J S Ko; Y Seo; M K Chae; S Y Jang; J S Yoon
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire Study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience Part 2 - visual function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Measuring quality of care and life in patients with an ocular prosthesis.

Authors:  Sébastien Ruiters; Stéphan De Jong; Ilse Mombaerts
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge.

Authors:  Keith Pine; Brian Sloan; Joanna Stewart; Robert J Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-05-10

10.  Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses.

Authors:  Arzu Atay; Kadriye Peker; Yumushan Günay; Servet Ebrinç; Banu Karayazgan; Ömer Uysal
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.