Literature DB >> 20231012

Health-related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients in Korea.

Ji Min Ahn1, Sang Yeul Lee, Jin Sook Yoon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study.
METHODS: The study included 134 monocular anophthalmic patients and 48 healthy volunteers who visited the department of Ophthalmology at the Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, between July and December 2008. Surveys were administered to participants to evaluate their sociodemographic characteristics and disease-related factors. Data collected from the Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale survey instruments were analyzed to identify significant differences and correlations between categories.
RESULTS: Anophthalmic patients scored lower in all categories of SF-36 compared with controls. Married females and participants with children generally had lower scores on the SF-36, and some of the differences were statistically significant. There were significant negative correlations between all SF-36 scores and participant self-evaluations on whether they had negative feelings regarding their social interpersonal relationships as a result of wearing prostheses. Those who scored higher on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety and depression scales tended to evade social interrelations significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Anophthalmic patients had lower health-related quality-of-life scores than healthy individuals. This finding was particularly evident in terms of the patients' own perceptions of their social relationships, which were negatively affected by their use of prosthetic eyes. Such perceptions reduced their quality of life and heightened their anxiety and depression. Therefore, it is important to evaluate both the physical and emotional well-being of anophthalmic patients to identify those patients who will need additional physical and mental support. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20231012     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.12.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications].

Authors:  K R Koch; W Trester; N Müller-Uri; M Trester; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Cryolite glass ocular prostheses and coralline hydroxyapatite implants for eye replacement following enucleation].

Authors:  A C Rokohl; K R Koch; M Trester; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Health-related quality of life after surgical removal of an eye.

Authors:  Takaaki Kondo; Walter T Tillman; Terry L Schwartz; John V Linberg; J Vernon Odom
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.746

4.  Social determinants associated with loss of an eye in the United States using the All of Us nationwide database.

Authors:  Alison X Chan; Bharanidharan Radha Saseendrakumar; Daniel J Ozzello; Michelle Ting; Jin Sook Yoon; Catherine Y Liu; Bobby S Korn; Don O Kikkawa; Sally L Baxter
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2021-12-30

5.  Predictive factors for comorbid psychiatric disorders and their impact on vision-related quality of life in patients with high myopia.

Authors:  Tae Yokoi; Muka Moriyama; Kengo Hayashi; Noriaki Shimada; Makoto Tomita; Naoki Yamamoto; Toru Nishikawa; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire Study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience Part 2 - visual function and quality of life.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire study: predictors of artificial eye wearers' experience part 1-comfort and satisfaction.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Emma Worrell; Andre S Litwin; Raman Malhotra
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.456

8.  Visual recovery following open globe injury with initial no light perception.

Authors:  Yong S Han; Shaheen C Kavoussi; Ron A Adelman
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-11

9.  Vision-Related Quality of Life and Appearance Concerns Are Associated with Anxiety and Depression after Eye Enucleation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Juan Ye; Lixia Lou; Kai Jin; Yufeng Xu; Xin Ye; Timothy Moss; Hayley McBain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of health-related quality of life in Turkish patients with facial prostheses.

Authors:  Arzu Atay; Kadriye Peker; Yumushan Günay; Servet Ebrinç; Banu Karayazgan; Ömer Uysal
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.