| Literature DB >> 33106535 |
Nathalie Charbonnel1, Maxime Galan2, Caroline Tatard2, Anne Loiseau2, Christophe Diagne2,3, Ambroise Dalecky4, Hugues Parrinello5, Stephanie Rialle5, Dany Severac5, Carine Brouat2.
Abstract
Biological invasions are major anthropogenic changes associated with threats to biodiversity and health. However, what determines the successful establishment and spread of introduced populations remains unclear. Here, we explore several hypotheses linking invasion success and immune phenotype traits, including those based on the evolution of increased competitive ability concept. We compared gene expression profiles between anciently and recently established populations of two major invading species, the house mouse Mus musculus domesticus and the black rat Rattus rattus, in Senegal (West Africa). Transcriptome analyses identified differential expression between anciently and recently established populations for 364 mouse genes and 83 rat genes. All immune-related genes displaying differential expression along the mouse invasion route were overexpressed at three of the four recently invaded sites studied. Complement activation pathway genes were overrepresented among these genes. By contrast, no particular immunological process was found to be overrepresented among the differentially expressed genes of black rat. Changes in transcriptome profiles were thus observed along invasion routes, but with different specific patterns between the two invasive species. These changes may be driven by increases in infection risks at sites recently invaded by the house mouse, and by stochastic events associated with colonization history for the black rat. These results constitute a first step toward the identification of immune eco-evolutionary processes potentially involved in the invasion success of these two rodent species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33106535 PMCID: PMC7589499 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75060-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Sampling sites for the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus (symbols in white) and the black rat, Rattus rattus (symbols in black) invasion routes. Triangles and squares correspond, respectively, to anciently and recently invaded sites. DAG Dagathie, MBA Mbakhana, THL Thilene, NDB Ndombo, CRB Croisement Boube, DOD Dodel, AEL Aere Lao, LOU Lougue, DIK Diakene Wolof, DIT Diattacounda, MAR Marsassoum, TOB Tobor, BAN Badi Nieriko, BOU Boutougoufara, KED Kedougou, SOU Soutouta.
Sampling sites and their invasion-related categorization as well as rodent sample sizes included in each biological replicate along the invasion routes of the house mouse and of the black rat.
| Invasion category | House mouse | Black rat | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sites | N (M/F) | Sites | N (M/F) | |
| Anciently invaded sites (> 100 years) | Dagathie | Diakene Wolof | ||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 6 (3/3) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Mbakhana | Diattacounda | |||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | |
| Thilene | Marsassoum | |||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 8 (4/4) | Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | |
| Ndombo | Tobor | |||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 6 (3/3) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Recently invaded sites (< 30 years) | Croisement Boube | BadiNieriko | ||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Dodel | Boutougoufara | |||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Aere Lao | Kedougou | |||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | |
| Lougue | Soutouta | |||
| Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | Pool of RNA #1 | 10 (5/5) | |
| Pool of RNA #2 | 8 (4/4) | Pool of RNA #2 | 10 (5/5) | |
N total number of rodents included, M number of males, F number of females.
Figure 2Significantly differentially expressed genes (orange dots) and immune related genes (red dots) between anciently and recently invaded sites along the invasion routes of (a) the house mouse and (b) the black rat. Only the 73 immune related genes belonging to biological pathways found to be significantly enriched are represented for the house mouse. Vertical lines indicate 1 log fold change (Log FC). The x-axis indicates genes that are down- (negative values) and up-regulated (positive values) in anciently compared to recently invaded areas.
Figure 3Heatmap of the differentially expressed (DE) genes between the anciently and recently invaded sites of the house mouse (M. musculus domesticus). The normalized read counts for the expressed genes are shown. For clarity, the heatmap was built in R using heatmap.2 for 29 immune related genes belonging to over-represented KEGG biological pathways. The genes (rows) and samples (columns) were clustered using dendrograms built with Ward distance and hierarchical clustering. Anciently and recently invaded sites are indicated using (AI) and (RI), respectively.
Figure 4Protein–protein interaction network drawn from the 73 immune genes found to belong to enriched biological processes related to immunity. Nodes correspond to proteins, the thickness of edge network indicates the strength of data support, and the minimum required interaction score was set to 0.7 (high confidence level). The plain circle indicates the alipoprotein A–aloa—and haptoglobin–Hp–protein. The dashed circle indicates the complement proteins (C8). Fibrinogen (Fg) and serine peptidase inhibitor (serpin) proteins are distributed within the highly connected central part of the network.