Literature DB >> 24636862

How important is intraspecific genetic admixture to the success of colonising populations?

Marc Rius1, John A Darling2.   

Abstract

Genetic admixture of divergent intraspecific lineages is increasingly suspected to have an important role in the success of colonising populations. However, admixture is not a universally beneficial genetic phenomenon. Selection is typically expected to favour locally adapted genotypes and can act against admixed individuals, suggesting that there are some conditions under which admixture will have negative impacts on population fitness. Therefore, it remains unclear how often admixture acts as a true driver of colonisation success. Here, we review the population consequences of admixture and discuss its costs and benefits across a broad spectrum of ecological contexts. We critically evaluate the evidence for a causal role of admixture in successful colonisation, and consider that role more generally in driving population range expansion.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24636862     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  107 in total

1.  Defense Response in Brazilian Honey Bees (Apis mellifera scutellata × spp.) Is Underpinned by Complex Patterns of Admixture.

Authors:  Brock A Harpur; Samir M Kadri; Ricardo O Orsi; Charles W Whitfield; Amro Zayed
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.416

2.  Genetic variation during range expansion: effects of habitat novelty and hybridization.

Authors:  Amanda A Pierce; Rafael Gutierrez; Amber M Rice; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Natural selection and outbreeding depression suggest adaptive differentiation in the invasive range of a clonal plant.

Authors:  Pauline O Pantoja; C E Timothy Paine; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genomic evidence of hybridization between two independent invasions of European green crab (Carcinus maenas) in the Northwest Atlantic.

Authors:  N W Jeffery; C DiBacco; B F Wringe; R R E Stanley; L C Hamilton; P N Ravindran; I R Bradbury
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Evolution: Geology and climate drive diversification.

Authors:  Rosemary G Gillespie; George K Roderick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The roles of demography and genetics in the early stages of colonization.

Authors:  Marianna Szűcs; Brett A Melbourne; Ty Tuff; Ruth A Hufbauer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Audrey L Kelly; Amanda A Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Distribution modelling of an introduced species: do adaptive genetic markers affect potential range?

Authors:  Neftalí Sillero; Raymond B Huey; George Gilchrist; Leslie Rissler; Marta Pascual
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Anthropogenic hybridization at sea: three evolutionary questions relevant to invasive species management.

Authors:  Frédérique Viard; Cynthia Riginos; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Potential limits to the benefits of admixture during biological invasion.

Authors:  Brittany S Barker; Janelle E Cocio; Samantha R Anderson; Joseph E Braasch; Feng A Cang; Heather D Gillette; Katrina M Dlugosch
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.