Literature DB >> 26756714

The power and promise of RNA-seq in ecology and evolution.

Erica V Todd1, Michael A Black2, Neil J Gemmell1.   

Abstract

Reference is regularly made to the power of new genomic sequencing approaches. Using powerful technology, however, is not the same as having the necessary power to address a research question with statistical robustness. In the rush to adopt new and improved genomic research methods, limitations of technology and experimental design may be initially neglected. Here, we review these issues with regard to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). RNA-seq adds large-scale transcriptomics to the toolkit of ecological and evolutionary biologists, enabling differential gene expression (DE) studies in nonmodel species without the need for prior genomic resources. High biological variance is typical of field-based gene expression studies and means that larger sample sizes are often needed to achieve the same degree of statistical power as clinical studies based on data from cell lines or inbred animal models. Sequencing costs have plummeted, yet RNA-seq studies still underutilize biological replication. Finite research budgets force a trade-off between sequencing effort and replication in RNA-seq experimental design. However, clear guidelines for negotiating this trade-off, while taking into account study-specific factors affecting power, are currently lacking. Study designs that prioritize sequencing depth over replication fail to capitalize on the power of RNA-seq technology for DE inference. Significant recent research effort has gone into developing statistical frameworks and software tools for power analysis and sample size calculation in the context of RNA-seq DE analysis. We synthesize progress in this area and derive an accessible rule-of-thumb guide for designing powerful RNA-seq experiments relevant in eco-evolutionary and clinical settings alike.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  RNA sequencing; biological replication; differential expression; experimental design; power analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756714     DOI: 10.1111/mec.13526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  49 in total

Review 1.  Here We Are, But Where Do We Go? A Systematic Review of Crustacean Transcriptomic Studies from 2014-2015.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Scott R Santos
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Messenger RNA enrichment using synthetic oligo(T) click nucleic acids.

Authors:  Alex J Anderson; Heidi R Culver; Tania R Prieto; Payton J Martinez; Jasmine Sinha; Stephanie J Bryant; Christopher N Bowman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Incidence and developmental timing of endosperm failure in post-zygotic isolation between wild tomato lineages.

Authors:  Morgane Roth; Ana M Florez-Rueda; Stephan Griesser; Margot Paris; Thomas Städler
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 4.  Peromyscus transcriptomics: Understanding adaptation and gene expression plasticity within and between species of deer mice.

Authors:  Jason Munshi-South; Jonathan L Richardson
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.727

5.  Relating quantitative variation within a behavior to variation in transcription.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Elizabeth C McKinney; Christopher B Cunningham; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  A simple guide to de novo transcriptome assembly and annotation.

Authors:  Venket Raghavan; Louis Kraft; Fantin Mesny; Linda Rigerte
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Nonrandom RNAseq gene expression associated with RNAlater and flash freezing storage methods.

Authors:  Courtney N Passow; Thomas J Y Kono; Bethany A Stahl; James B Jaggard; Alex C Keene; Suzanne E McGaugh
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation.

Authors:  Thomas D Brekke; Lindy A Henry; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Alternative migratory tactics in brown trout (Salmo trutta) are underpinned by divergent regulation of metabolic but not neurological genes.

Authors:  Robert Wynne; Louise C Archer; Stephen A Hutton; Luke Harman; Patrick Gargan; Peter A Moran; Eileen Dillane; Jamie Coughlan; Thomas F Cross; Philip McGinnity; Thomas J Colgan; Thomas E Reed
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Multiomic analysis of the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) kidney reveals a role for cholesterol in water conservation.

Authors:  Fernando Alvira-Iraizoz; Benjamin T Gillard; Panjiao Lin; Alex Paterson; Audrys G Pauža; Mahmoud A Ali; Ammar H Alabsi; Pamela A Burger; Naserddine Hamadi; Abdu Adem; David Murphy; Michael P Greenwood
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.