Literature DB >> 12571595

Introduced species and their missing parasites.

Mark E Torchin1, Kevin D Lafferty, Andrew P Dobson, Valerie J McKenzie, Armand M Kuris.   

Abstract

Damage caused by introduced species results from the high population densities and large body sizes that they attain in their new location. Escape from the effects of natural enemies is a frequent explanation given for the success of introduced species. Because some parasites can reduce host density and decrease body size, an invader that leaves parasites behind and encounters few new parasites can experience a demographic release and become a pest. To test whether introduced species are less parasitized, we have compared the parasites of exotic species in their native and introduced ranges, using 26 host species of molluscs, crustaceans, fishes, birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles. Here we report that the number of parasite species found in native populations is twice that found in exotic populations. In addition, introduced populations are less heavily parasitized (in terms of percentage infected) than are native populations. Reduced parasitization of introduced species has several causes, including reduced probability of the introduction of parasites with exotic species (or early extinction after host establishment), absence of other required hosts in the new location, and the host-specific limitations of native parasites adapting to new hosts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12571595     DOI: 10.1038/nature01346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  194 in total

1.  The paradox of the parasites: implications for biological invasion.

Authors:  John M Drake
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Cross-Cordillera exchange mediated by the Panama Canal increased the species richness of local freshwater fish assemblages.

Authors:  Scott A Smith; Graham Bell; Eldredge Bermingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Is there such thing as a parasite free lunch? The direct and indirect consequences of eating invasive prey.

Authors:  Grégory Bulté; Stacey A Robinson; Mark R Forbes; David J Marcogliese
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.184

4.  Population size and molecular evolution on islands.

Authors:  Megan Woolfit; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Geographic patterns of herbivory and resource allocation to defense, growth, and reproduction in an invasive biennial, Alliaria petiolata.

Authors:  Kristin C Lewis; F A Bazzaz; Qing Liao; Colin M Orians
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Parasites dominate food web links.

Authors:  Kevin D Lafferty; Andrew P Dobson; Armand M Kuris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Heterosis, the catapult effect and establishment success of a colonizing bird.

Authors:  John M Drake
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species.

Authors:  Marten Scheffer; Egbert H van Nes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Invasion of an asexual American water flea clone throughout Africa and rapid displacement of a native sibling species.

Authors:  Joachim Mergeay; Dirk Verschuren; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Cestode parasitism in invasive and native brine shrimps (Artemia spp.) as a possible factor promoting the rapid invasion of A. franciscana in the Mediterranean region.

Authors:  B B Georgiev; M I Sánchez; G P Vasileva; P N Nikolov; A J Green
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 2.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.