Literature DB >> 20802480

The ratio of human X chromosome to autosome diversity is positively correlated with genetic distance from genes.

Michael F Hammer1, August E Woerner, Fernando L Mendez, Joseph C Watkins, Murray P Cox, Jeffrey D Wall.   

Abstract

The ratio of X-linked to autosomal diversity was estimated from an analysis of six human genome sequences and found to deviate from the expected value of 0.75. However, the direction of this deviation depends on whether a particular sequence is close to or far from the nearest gene. This pattern may be explained by stronger locally acting selection on X-linked genes compared with autosomal genes, combined with larger effective population sizes for females than for males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20802480     DOI: 10.1038/ng.651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  15 in total

1.  Gene density and human nucleotide polymorphism.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  A pseudohitchhiking model of X vs. autosomal diversity.

Authors:  Andrea J Betancourt; Yuseob Kim; H Allen Orr
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A map of the human genome in linkage disequilibrium units.

Authors:  W Tapper; A Collins; J Gibson; N Maniatis; S Ennis; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Population size changes reshape genomic patterns of diversity.

Authors:  John E Pool; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; M T Morgan; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Evaluating signatures of sex-specific processes in the human genome.

Authors:  Carlos D Bustamante; Sohini Ramachandran
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Sex-biased evolutionary forces shape genomic patterns of human diversity.

Authors:  Michael F Hammer; Fernando L Mendez; Murray P Cox; August E Woerner; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  51 in total

1.  Recombination networks as genetic markers in a human variation study of the Old World.

Authors:  Asif Javed; Marta Melé; Marc Pybus; Pierre Zalloua; Marc Haber; David Comas; Mihai G Netea; Oleg Balanovsky; Elena Balanovska; Li Jin; Yajun Yang; Ganeshprasad Arunkumar; Ramasamy Pitchappan; Jaume Bertranpetit; Francesc Calafell; Laxmi Parida
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Estimators of the human effective sex ratio detect sex biases on different timescales.

Authors:  Leslie S Emery; Joseph Felsenstein; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Extensive X-linked adaptive evolution in central chimpanzees.

Authors:  Christina Hvilsom; Yu Qian; Thomas Bataillon; Yingrui Li; Thomas Mailund; Bettina Sallé; Frands Carlsen; Ruiqiang Li; Hancheng Zheng; Tao Jiang; Hui Jiang; Xin Jin; Kasper Munch; Asger Hobolth; Hans R Siegismund; Jun Wang; Mikkel Heide Schierup
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Finding the factors of reduced genetic diversity on X chromosomes of Macaca fascicularis: male-driven evolution, demography, and natural selection.

Authors:  Naoki Osada; Shigeki Nakagome; Shuhei Mano; Yosuke Kameoka; Ichiro Takahashi; Keiji Terao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Great ape genomics.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2013

6.  A reduced representation approach to population genetic analyses and applications to human evolution.

Authors:  Francesca Luca; Richard R Hudson; David B Witonsky; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The joint effects of background selection and genetic recombination on local gene genealogies.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  How closely does genetic diversity in finite populations conform to predictions of neutral theory? Large deficits in regions of low recombination.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  An early divergence of KhoeSan ancestors from those of other modern humans is supported by an ABC-based analysis of autosomal resequencing data.

Authors:  Krishna R Veeramah; Daniel Wegmann; August Woerner; Fernando L Mendez; Joseph C Watkins; Giovanni Destro-Bisol; Himla Soodyall; Leslie Louie; Michael F Hammer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Purifying selection causes widespread distortions of genealogical structure on the human X chromosome.

Authors:  Brendan O'Fallon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.