| Literature DB >> 33105570 |
Abdelsamed I Elshamy1, Naglaa M Ammar2, Heba A Hassan2, Walaa A El-Kashak1, Salim S Al-Rejaie3, Ahmed M Abd-ElGawad4,5, Abdel-Razik H Farrag6.
Abstract
Wounds and burn injury are major causes of death and disability worldwide. Myricetin is a common bioactive flavonoid isolated naturally from the plant kingdom. Herein, a topical application of naturally isolated myricetin from the shoots of Tecomaria capensis v. aurea on excisional wound healing that was performed in albino rats. The wounded rats were treated every day with 10 and 20% myricetin for 14 days. During the experiment, the wound closure percentage was estimated at days 0, 7, and 14. Effects of myricetin on the inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68) in the serum were evaluated using immunosorbent assay kits. The percentage of wound closure and contraction was delayed in wounded rats (67.35%) and was remarkably increased after treatment of wounded rats with myricetin; the treatment with 20% myricetin was the most potent (98.76%). Histological findings exhibited that 10% myricetin caused the formation of a large area of scarring at the wound enclosure and stratified squamous epithelium without the formation of papillae as in the control group. Treatment with 20% myricetin exhibited less area of scarring at the wound enclosure as well as re-epithelialization with a high density of fibroblasts and blood capillaries in the wound. Level elevations of serum pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-1β, and TNF-α and macrophage CD68 were decreased in wounded rats treated with myricetin. Thus, it can be suggested that the enhancements in inflammatory cytokines as well as systemic reorganization after myricetin treatment may be recommended to play a crucial part in the promotion of wound healing. The findings suggest that treatment with a higher dose of myricetin was better in improving wound curing in rats. It could serve as a potent anti-inflammatory agent and can be used as an adjunctive or alternative agent in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Tecomaria capensis v. aurea; flavonoids; inflammatory cytokines; myricetin; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33105570 PMCID: PMC7659475 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25214870
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structure of myricetin isolated from T. capensis.
The change of wound area (mm2) and contraction percentage (%) in each group.
| Group | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wound | 101.5 ± 1.1 | 82.5 ± 3.2 (18.7%) a | 33.1 ± 2.7 (67.3%) |
| Dermazin | 115.3 ± 5.3 | 36.7 ± 1.6 * (63.8%) | 2.7 ± 1.8 * (97.3%) |
| Paraffin | 103.5 ± 2.7 | 54.5 ± 3.4 * (46.3%) | 3.7 ± 2.2 * (96.3%) |
| 10% Myricetin | 113.8 ± 2.2 | 47.2 ± 6 * (53.4%) | 11.0 ± 2.3 * (89.1%) |
| 20% Myricetin | 111.3 ± 2.8 | 34.1 ± 2.7 * (66.4%) | 1.2 ± 0.9 * (98.8%) |
a Values are mean ± SEM (%), * significant at p < 0.05 compared with the wound group.
Effect of myricetin treatment on serum levels of TNF-α and IL-1β in rats with the wounded model.
| Groups | TNF- | IL-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 76.2 ± 8.2 | 86.1 ± 7.7 a |
| Wound | 668.6 ± 49.2 * | 616.3 ± 47.6 * |
| Dermazin | 116.6 ± 13.9 ** | 131.4 ± 13.2 ** |
| Paraffin | 126 ± 14.2 ** | 148.9 ± 7.8 ** |
| 10% Myricetin | 110.7 ± 12.9 ** | 136.3 ± 21.7 ** |
| 20% Myricetin | 77.3 ± 3.8 ** | 96.3 ± 5.7 ** |
a Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, where ** p < 0.05 versus wounded rats, * p < 0.05 versus normal control.
Figure 2Effect of myricetin treatment on serum levels of CD68 in rats. * p < 0.05 versus wounded rats, p < 0.05 versus normal control.
Figure 3Photomicrographs of a skin section from (A) a control rat showing a well-formed thick granular cell layer, the dermis contains a deposit of collagen fibers and minimal inflammation, (B) control positive group, (C) 10% myricetin treated group, (D) 20% myricetin treated group, (E) drug-treated group, and (F) paraffin treated group (yellow arrows: inflammations) (H&E stain, scale bar 100 µm).
Area of collagen (µm2) in the dermis of rats.
| Group | Area of Collagen (µm²) |
|---|---|
| Normal | 48 ± 4.5 a |
| + Control | 28.7 ± 2.4 * |
| 10% Myricetin | 45.1 ± 5.9 ** |
| 20% Myricetin | 54.8 ± 1.8 ** |
| Drug | 43 ± 5.5 ** |
| Paraffin | 25.5 ± 4.9 * |
a Data presented as mean ± SEM, * significant decrease at p < 0.05 as compared with normal, ** significant increase at p < 0.05 as compared with + control.
Figure 4Photomicrographs of a skin section from (A) a control rat showing well-formed but thick granular cell layer, the underlying dermis contains deposited collagen fibers with minimal inflammation, (B) positive control group, (C) 10% myricetin treated group, (D) 20% myricetin treated group, (E) drug-treated group, and (F) paraffin treated group (yellow arrows: collagen deposit) (Masson’s trichrome stain, scale bar 100 µm).