Literature DB >> 10343791

Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search.

J M Wolfe1, N L Klempen, E P Shulman.   

Abstract

What is the orientation of an object? A simple line has an axis of orientation. That line, turned upside-down, is indistinguishable from the original line. Thus, the possible orientations of a line range from 0 to 180 degrees. Most objects, however, have an axis and a polarity. A polar object, turned upside-down, looks upside-down. Accordingly, the orientations of a polar object range from 0 to 360 degrees. A series of visual search experiments were run to determine if preattentive processes represent orientation in a 180 or a 360 degrees framework. Results suggest that preattentive orientation is represented in 180 degrees. Experiments 1 and 4 show that search for a target rotated 90 degrees from the distractors is more efficient than search for a target rotated 180 degrees from the distractors. Experiments 2, 3, and 5 use a variety of different stimuli to demonstrate that search for targets rotated 180 degrees from distractors is inefficient.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343791     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00260-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Event-related brain potentials and the efficiency of visual search for vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli.

Authors:  Bruno Kopp; Jasmin Kizilirmak; Carolin Liebscher; Julia Runge; Karl Wessel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  A unique visual rhythm does not pop out.

Authors:  Hui Li; Yan Bao; Ernst Pöppel; Yi-Huang Su
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-11

Review 3.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  The Functional Visual Field(s) in simple visual search.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Feature similarity is non-linearly related to attentional selection: Evidence from visual search and sustained attention tasks.

Authors:  Angus F Chapman; Viola S Störmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

6.  Letter processing in upright bigrams predicts reading fluency variations in children.

Authors:  Aakash Agrawal; Sonali Nag; K V S Hari; S P Arun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-02-10

7.  Shape beyond recognition: form-derived directionality and its effects on visual attention and motion perception.

Authors:  Heida M Sigurdardottir; Suzanne M Michalak; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-04-08

8.  Is apparent instability a guiding feature in visual search?

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-06-16

9.  Attentional requirements on feature search are modulated by stimulus properties.

Authors:  Janne F Ettwig; Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Turning visual search time on its head.

Authors:  S P Arun
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 1.886

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.