Literature DB >> 9536360

Feature asymmetries in visual search: effects of display duration, target eccentricity, orientation and spatial frequency.

M Carrasco1, T L McLean, S M Katz, K S Frieder.   

Abstract

In Experiments 1-3, we monitored search performance as a function of target eccentricity under display durations that either allowed or precluded eye movements. The display was present either until observers responded, for 104 msec, or for 62 msec. In all three experiments an orientation asymmetry emerged: observers detected a tilted target among vertical distracters more efficiently than a vertical target among vertical distracters. As target eccentricity increased, reaction times and errors augmented, and the set size effect became more pronounced, more so for vertical than tilted targets. In Experiments 4-7, the stimulus spatial properties were manipulated: spatial frequency; size; and orientation. The eccentricity effect was more pronounced for vertical than tilted targets and for high- than low-spatial frequency targets. This effect was eliminated when either the size, the size and orientation, or the size and spatial frequency were magnified (M-cortical factor). By increasing the signal-to-noise ratio, magnification reduced the extent of both asymmetries; it aided more the detection of tilted than vertical and of high- than low-spatial frequency targets. Experiments 4-7 indicate that performance improvement in the magnified conditions was due to the specific pairing of stimulus size with retinal eccentricity and not to the larger stimulus size of the magnified conditions. We conclude that stimulus size, orientation and spatial frequency influence the extent of the eccentricity effect and the efficiency of search performance.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9536360     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00152-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  33 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C P Talgar; E L Cameron
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2001

3.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Information-limited parallel processing in difficult heterogeneous covert visual search.

Authors:  Barbara Anne Dosher; Songmei Han; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The effects of task difficulty on visual search strategy in virtual 3D displays.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Tyler W Garaas; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Unconscious perception of a flash can trigger line motion illusion.

Authors:  Manuel J Blanco; David Soto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22

Review 10.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.