Phoebe Dalwood1, Skye Marshall2,3, Tracy L Burrows4,5, Ashleigh McIntosh1, Clare E Collins4,5. 1. Bond University Nutrition & Dietetics Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond Universtiy, Robina, Queensland, 4226, Australia. 2. Bond University Nutrition & Dietetics Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond Universtiy, Robina, Queensland, 4226, Australia. skye_marshall@bond.edu.au. 3. Nutrition Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. skye_marshall@bond.edu.au. 4. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. 5. Priority Research Centre in Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To describe a-priori diet quality indices used in children and adolescents, appraise the validity and reliability of these indices, and synthesise evidence on the relationship between diet quality and physical and mental health, and growth-related outcomes. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched until January 2019. An a-priori diet quality index was included if it applied a scoring structure to rate child or adolescent (aged 0-18-years) dietary intakes relative to dietary or nutrient guidelines. Diagnostic accuracy studies and prospective cohort studies reporting health outcomes were appraised using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist. RESULTS: From 15,577 records screened, 128 unique paediatric diet quality indices were identified from 33 countries. Half of the indices' scores rated both food and nutrient intakes (n = 65 indices). Some indices were age specific: infant (< 24-months; n = 8 indices), child (2-12-years; n = 16), adolescent (13-18 years; n = 8), and child/adolescent (n = 14). Thirty-seven indices evaluated for validity and/or reliability. Eleven of the 15 indices which investigated associations with prospective health outcomes reported significant results, such as improved IQ, quality of life, blood pressure, body composition, and prevalence of metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Research utilising diet quality indices in paediatric populations is rapidly expanding internationally. However, few indices have been evaluated for validity, reliability, or association with health outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the validity, reliability, and association with health of frequently utilised diet quality indices to ensure data generated by an index is useful, applicable, and relevant. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD42018107630 .
BACKGROUND: To describe a-priori diet quality indices used in children and adolescents, appraise the validity and reliability of these indices, and synthesise evidence on the relationship between diet quality and physical and mental health, and growth-related outcomes. METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched until January 2019. An a-priori diet quality index was included if it applied a scoring structure to rate child or adolescent (aged 0-18-years) dietary intakes relative to dietary or nutrient guidelines. Diagnostic accuracy studies and prospective cohort studies reporting health outcomes were appraised using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist. RESULTS: From 15,577 records screened, 128 unique paediatric diet quality indices were identified from 33 countries. Half of the indices' scores rated both food and nutrient intakes (n = 65 indices). Some indices were age specific: infant (< 24-months; n = 8 indices), child (2-12-years; n = 16), adolescent (13-18 years; n = 8), and child/adolescent (n = 14). Thirty-seven indices evaluated for validity and/or reliability. Eleven of the 15 indices which investigated associations with prospective health outcomes reported significant results, such as improved IQ, quality of life, blood pressure, body composition, and prevalence of metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Research utilising diet quality indices in paediatric populations is rapidly expanding internationally. However, few indices have been evaluated for validity, reliability, or association with health outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the validity, reliability, and association with health of frequently utilised diet quality indices to ensure data generated by an index is useful, applicable, and relevant. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO number: CRD42018107630 .
Authors: A Trichopoulou; A Kouris-Blazos; M L Wahlqvist; C Gnardellis; P Lagiou; E Polychronopoulos; T Vassilakou; L Lipworth; D Trichopoulos Journal: BMJ Date: 1995-12-02
Authors: Roseli B D Toffano; Elaine Hillesheim; Mariana G Mathias; Carolina A Coelho-Landell; Roberta G Salomão; Maria O R V Almada; Joyce M Camarneiro; Tamiris T Barros; José S Camelo-Junior; Serge Rezzi; Laurence Goulet; Maria P Giner; Laeticia Da Silva; Francois-Pierre Martin; Ivan Montoliu; Sofia Moco; Sebastiano Collino; Jim Kaput; Jacqueline P Monteiro Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Milton A Romero-Robles; Fabricio Ccami-Bernal; Zhamanda N Ortiz-Benique; Diego F Pinto-Ruiz; Vicente A Benites-Zapata; Donovan Casas Patiño Journal: BMC Nutr Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Michelle Blumfield; Carlene Starck; Tim Keighley; Peter Petocz; Anna Roesler; Kylie Abbott; Tim Cassettari; Skye Marshall; Flavia Fayet-Moore Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Melissa C Kay; Emily W Duffy; Lisa J Harnack; Andrea S Anater; Joel C Hampton; Alison L Eldridge; Mary Story Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 6.706