Literature DB >> 33096837

Gender Differences in Genetic Associations of RAB38 with Urinary Protein-to-Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Levels in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients.

Zhi-Lei Yu1, Chung-Shun Wong2,3,4, Yi Ting Lai1, Wan-Hsuan Chou1, Imaniar Noor Faridah1,5, Chih-Chin Kao6,7, Yuh-Feng Lin2,7,8, Wei-Chiao Chang1,9,10,11.   

Abstract

Renal dysfunction is common in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Previous findings from a meta-analysis of GWAS indicated that the variation of RAB38/CTSC is highly associated with the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) in European populations. In addition, RAB38 knockout rats showed an increase in urinary albumins. Although the prevalence of chronic kidney disease is high in Taiwan, the role of genetic variants in diabetic renal function is still unclear. In the current study, 275 diabetic nephropathy (DN) patients were recruited to perform a genetic association study. Our results indicated that rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646 in RAB38 were significantly associated with urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) levels in DN patients. Importantly, after analysis stratified by gender, a significant genetic influence on UPCR levels was observed in the male population. The findings confirmed the roles of gender and variants of RAB38 in the risk of UPCR in Diabetic Nephropathy patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DM (diabetes mellitus); DN (diabetic nephropathy); RAB38; albuminuria; genetic polymorphism

Year:  2020        PMID: 33096837      PMCID: PMC7711808          DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Med        ISSN: 2075-4426


1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) affects around 9.3% of all adults worldwide [1]. Renal dysfunction is common in patients with DM, which is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) in Taiwan [2]. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by glomerular hypertrophy, proteinuria, and renal fibrosis that resulted in the loss of renal function. The appearance of albuminuria is a hallmark of DN. Elevation of albuminuria is associated with an increased risk for CKD progression and ESRD [3]. Several mechanisms of DN have been proposed such as: (1) abnormal lipid metabolism, (2) glomerular hyperfiltration, (3) defected podocyte-specific insulin signaling, (4) congenital mutation in nephrin expression, (5) advanced glycation end products (AGEs), (6) hyperglycemia, (7) activation of cytokines, and (8) vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) signaling [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Numerous familial aggregation studies have indicated that genetic factors are involved in the development and progression of DN [11,12]. Indeed, genetic factors have been considered to be relevant to the etiology of DN [8]. Epidemiologic studies also indicated that neither the presence of hyperglycemia nor genetic variants alone are sufficient to elicit the renal damage that typically manifests itself as albuminuria in diabetes [13,14]. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been widely applied to identify susceptibility genes that associated with the risk of diabetic kidney diseases [15,16,17,18,19,20]. For example, Alexander et al. performed a meta-analysis of GWAS that nicely demonstrated the strong correlation between the variation of RAB38/CTSC and the urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). Furthermore, streptozotocin-induced diabetic RAB38 knockout rats expressed higher urinary albumin concentrations and decreased amounts of megalin and cubilin at the proximal tubule cell surfaces [20]. The results suggested a critical role of the RAB38 signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of DN. Because of the high incidence and prevalence of the ESRD in Taiwan, the aim of this study is to determine the genetic role of RAB38 for diabetic nephropathyin a Taiwanese population.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects

A schematic depiction illustrated the study workflow in Figure 1. A total of 275 patients were recruited from Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital between January 2015 to December 2016 and Taipei Medical University Hospital between January 2014 to May 2015. Inclusion criteria were age between 20 and 90 years, patients with a confirmed diagnosis of DM (fasting glucose above 126 mg/dL or non-fasting glucose above 200mg/dL) before the onset of CKD (presence of albuminuria or eGFR below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Overt proteinuria was defined as the level that is easily detectable using routine screening methods (usually greater than 300 to 500 mg/day). Overt albuminuria, macroalbuminuria, or proteinuria is defined as a total daily protein excretion >300 mg and <3.5 g. Nephrotic range proteinuria is defined as a total daily protein excretion of >3.5 g (random urine protein/urine creatinine ratio >3.5). Chronic kidney disease is defined as having two previous estimated Cockcroft and Gault creatinine clearance values (eGFR) <60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or eGFR >60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with kidney damage 3 to 6 months apart. Estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 186.3 * (Creatinine/88.4)−1.154 * (Age)−0.203 * (0.742 if female) * (1.210 if black) [21]. Patients with obvious infectious disease, as well as those who underwent kidney transplantation or surgery within 3 months preceding the study were excluded. The detailed clinical data including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, comorbidities status and laboratory parameters were collected. The formulation of urinary protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR) is as follows: UPCR (mg/g) = (urine total protein, mg/dL) * 1000/(urine creatinine, mg/dL). This study conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the regional ethics committee at Taipei Medical University (TMU-JIRB No.: 201411056). Written informed consent from all subjects were received before any data were collected.
Figure 1

A workflow for Genetic Association Studies.

2.2. Selection of Candidate Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs)

A previous study indicated that RAB38 is a critical gene for DN-mediated kidney function. This finding was validated by RAB38 knockout mice experiments [20]. Tagging SNP (tSNP) is a representative SNP in a region of the genome with high linkage disequilibrium. In this study, the Genomes Browser Ensembl GRCh37 release 87 was used to download the information of Han Chinese in Beijing (CHB) from 1000 Genome Project (Dec 2016 (phase 3)). A total of 10 tSNPs were selected through the Haloview 4.2 program at r2 greater than or equal to 0.7. The Hardy–Weinberg p cutoff was set at 0.01. The minor allele frequency (MAF) of these tSNPs in the Taiwanese population was verified to be greater than 10% on the website of Taiwan Biobank: https://taiwanview.twbiobank.org.tw/index (accessed on 30 April 2020). However, the primer of rs3740925 failed to pass the quality control and there was no substitute SNP, thus nine SNPs were used to conduct genotyping in this study. A pairwise LD map for RAB38 was constructed with a CHB panel using the R package LDheatmap (Figure S1).

2.3. DNA Extraction

Whole blood was collected from patients who met the inclusion criteria. Genomic DNA was isolated from the buffy coat using the standardized method in the Gentra Puregene kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). A typical extraction yields approximately 100 ug of DNA from 3 mL of whole blood.

2.4. Genotyping

Nine SNPs were genotyped using TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Briefly, Taqman probes are labeled with different fluorescent markers. PCR primers and TaqMan probes are designed with SNP sites. Reaction was performed in 96 well microplates with ABI 9700 thermal cycles (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Fluorescence was measured by the ABI Real Time PCR system and analyzed with StepOne software version 2.22 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis was conducted by using R software (version 3.6.0, Vienna, Austria). Spearman’s correlations between clinical variables were calculated with an R corr package. Associations between UPCR and genotypes were analyzed under genotypic, dominant, recessive, and log-additive models with the R SNPassoc package. Furthermore, associations between DN susceptibility and genotypes were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Any difference with p value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The q values as the false discovery rate (FDR) estimation with the Benjamini–Liu method were calculated using the R discreteMTP package for multiple-testing correction [22]. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) V8 database was interrogated to investigate the correlations between genotypes of the UPCR-associated variants and tissue-specific RAB38 expression (accession date: 22 June 2020). Moreover, the statistical power for the analysis of association between SNPs and DN susceptibility was calculated using the GASpower calculator. It is an interactive tool to calculate power for genetic association studies in case-control designs [23].

2.6. General Population in Taiwan Biobank

The Taiwan Biobank is a biological database exclusively for the Taiwanese general population. This is a large-scale community-based cohort of relatively healthy volunteers who either have no history of cancer or are self-claimed cancer-free, and a hospital-based cohort including patients affected by pervasive chronic diseases as well as cancer patients. Currently, the Taiwan Biobank has accumulated over 114,000 voluntary participants. Among them, DNA of 20,645 participants was subjected to genome-wide genotyping using Affymetrix Axiom TWB array, and 1000 participants were sequenced with the Illumina platform. The summary statistics of their variants is available online. In this study, tSNPs allele and genotype frequencies from the genome-wide genotyping and sequencing data in the community-based cohort were queried in the Taiwan Biobank (https://www.twbiobank.org.tw/new_web/index.php (accessed on 30 April 2020)).

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Study Samples

A total of 275 patients were recruited in this study. Among these patients, 57.45% are male and 42.55% are female. The mean age was 66 years old. GFR was 53.17 ± 34.71 mL/min/1.73 m2. The mean UPCR was 1723.67 mg/g (Table 1). In Figure 2, a Spearman correlation plot demonstrates the relevance between various clinical characteristics in this diabetic nephropathy study cohort. We found that UPCR has a significant positive correlation with sex (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.19) and hypertension (Spearman correlation coefficient: 0.22), and it is negatively correlated with eGFR (Spearman correlation coefficient: −0.52).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population.

CharacteristicsStudy Population
Total number275
Male (%)158 (57.45)
Female (%)117 (42.55)
Age (mean ± SD years)66.47 ± 13.73
BMI (mean ± SD kg/m2)26.71 ± 4.67
Hypertension (%)77.09
Smoking (%)21.98
GFR (mean ± SD mL/min/1.73 m2)53.17 ± 34.71
HbA1C (mean ± SD %)6.99 ± 1.46
UPCR (mean ± SD mg/g)1723.67 ± 2760.07

SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; HbA1C: hemoglobin A1c; UPCR: urine protein and creatinine ratio.

Figure 2

Spearman correlation plot of clinical characteristics in diabetic nephropathy (DN) patients. Significant positive and negative correlations (p < 0.01) are shown in red and blue, respectively. Spearman’s correlation coefficients are shown in wells. UPCR: urine protein and creatinine ratio; BMI: body mass index; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; HbA1C: hemoglobin A1c.

3.2. rs1027027, rs302647, rs302646 Are Associated with UPCR Levels in DN Patients

For this study, nine tagging SNPs of RAB38 were selected. The relative locations of the SNPs on chromosome 11 were depicted in Figure 3. Of these tSNPs, rs9144 and rs1027027 are located on 3′untranslated region (3′-UTR), rs302646 is located on the exon, and the others are in intron regions. The position, location, alteration and allele frequencies of nine tSNPs among different populations are illustrated in Table 2. Allele frequencies of the Taiwanese population were queried from the array and sequencing data in the community-based cohort of the Taiwan Biobank. Similar allele frequency in Taiwan biobank and current cohort indicated a good genotyping quality in this study. The frequencies of all SNPs were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.
Figure 3

Illustration of genotyped human RAB38 gene polymorphisms on chromosome 11. Red bar represents untranslated regions (UTR). Green bar represents exons.

Table 2

Basic characteristics of the RAB38 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Position (GRCh37)VariantRefAltLocationAfrican FrequencyAmerican FrequencyEuropean FrequencyAsian FrequencyTaiwan Biobank Frequency Current Cohort FrequencyTWB-HWE *
Chr11:87846757rs9144CT3′-UTR0.870.660.630.670.670.670.07
Chr11:87847063rs1027027CA3′-UTR0.350.310.260.130.120.10.69
Chr11:87857804rs11018529TCintronic0.390.490.630.440.450.570.94
Chr11:87860095rs11018537AGintronic0.110.150.250.210.240.280.66
Chr11:87866122rs7104391GAintronic0.960.880.950.830.720.70.36
Chr11:87884748rs747571TCintronic0.410.340.340.170.170.170.15
Chr11:87905301rs11018720CTintronic0.410.420.430.290.280.270.43
Chr11:87908346rs302647CGintronic0.120.290.350.270.280.290.61
Chr11:87908448rs302646AGexon0.760.790.870.570.560.570.74

* Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in Taiwan Biobank cohort was tested using array data for rs1027027, rs11018529, and rs11018537, and sequencing data for other SNPs, where array data are not available.

We analyzed the association between SNP and UPCR. As shown in Table 3, after analysis adjusted for possible covariates such as age, gender, GFR and hypertension, rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646 revealed a significant association with UPCR level under the log-additive model after FDR control for tests on multiple SNPs (q = 0.027, 0.033, 0.018, respectively). In rs1027027, C/C genotype showed the lowest mean UPCR of 1487.4 ± 165.3 mg/g, and with the increment of A allele, UPCR elevated correspondingly. The patients with C/A and A/A genotypes at rs1027027 have UPCR levels of 2605.4 ± 549.1 and 4475.5 ± 3295.8 mg/g, respectively. For rs302647, the patients with C/C genotype showed the lowest mean UPCR of 1477.8 ± 207.6 mg/g, and patients with the increment of G allele, UPCR elevated. The C/G genotype had a mean UPCR of 1950.1 ± 314.9 mg/g and the GG genotype had the highest mean UPCR of 2365.4 ± 697.4 mg/g. For rs302646, the A/A genotype showed the lowest mean UPCR of 1126.9 ± 268.3 mg/g, and UPCR elevated as the G allele incremented. The A/G genotype had a mean UPCR of 1404.8 ± 197.9 mg/g and the G/G genotype had the highest mean UPCR of 2440.0 ± 376.9 mg/g. Moreover, the distribution of lnUPCR in different genotypes at rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646 showed no significant differences between groups (Figure S2).
Table 3

Association analysis between RAB38 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the urine protein and creatinine ratio (UPCR).

UPCRGenotypicDominantRecessiveLog-Additive
VariantGenotypeNumber(%)MeanSEp Valueq Valuep Valueq Valuep Valueq Valuep Valueq Value
rs9144TT119(45.9)1535.8 231.2
CT110(42.5)1839.6 285.3 0.648 0.648 0.454 0.584 0.783 0.881 0.675 0.759
CC30(11.6)1700.7 448.9
rs1027027CC215(81.1)1487.4 165.3
CA47(17.7)2605.4 549.1 0.018 0.081 0.013 0.058 0.061 0.243 0.006 0.027
AA3(1.1)4475.5 3295.8
rs11018529CC88(32.6)1994.4 335.4
TC131(48.5)1456.2 214.0 0.551 0.620 0.313 0.584 0.957 0.957 0.522 0.671
TT51(18.9)1918.1 394.6
rs11018537AA144(54.8)1751.4 225.7
AG92(35.0)1531.3 257.3 0.327 0.513 0.521 0.586 0.135 0.243 0.252 0.396
GG27(10.3)2211.7 778.8
rs7104391AA127(49.0)1827.3 258.1
AG110(42.5)1509.9 239.2 0.503 0.620 0.385 0.584 0.312 0.401 0.264 0.396
GG22(8.5)1149.8 297.7
rs747571TT175(69.4)1469.0 182.2
TC68(27.0)2166.0 401.0 0.342 0.513 0.606 0.606 0.236 0.354 0.978 0.978
CC9(3.6)1036.9 404.5
rs11018720CC143(53.2)1470.7 201.1
CT106(39.4)1914.8 287.3 0.306 0.513 0.432 0.584 0.135 0.243 0.210 0.396
TT20(7.4)2811.5 888.0
rs302647CC131(51.4)1477.8 207.6
CG98(38.4)1950.1 314.9 0.040 0.120 0.028 0.084 0.056 0.243 0.011 0.033
GG26(10.2)2365.4 697.4
rs302646GG92(34.5)2440.0 376.9
AG122(45.7)1404.8 197.9 0.005 0.045 0.001 0.009 0.086 0.243 0.002 0.018
AA53(19.9)1126.9 268.3

All p-values were adjusted for age, sex, glomerular filtration rate, and hypertension history. Significant values (p < 0.05) were in bold. The q value is the false discovery rate (FDR) estimation for multi-testing.

3.3. Gender Difference in the Association between rs1027027, rs302647, rs302646 and UPCR Levels in DN Patients

Furthermore, we conducted a subset analysis stratified by gender. Strikingly, a significant difference in the genetic association of UPCR was observed (Table 4 and Table 5). Among the nine SNPs examined, rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646 in the male cohort were significant under the log-additive model (q = 0.032, 0.045, and 0.032). However, no significant differences were found in the female cohort.
Table 4

Association analysis between RAB38 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the urine protein and creatinine ratio (UPCR) in the male cohort.

UPCRGenotypicDominantRecessiveLog-Additive
VariantGenotypeNumber(%)MeanSEp Valueq Valuep Valueq Valuep Valueq Valuep Valueq Value
rs9144TT71(47.7)2057.0 354.3
CT62(41.6)2250.1 450.5 0.991 0.991 0.901 0.946 0.997 0.997 0.927 0.988
CC16(10.7)2596.9 748.4
rs1027027CC116(75.8)1882.4 269.2
CA35(22.9)3427.3 685.3 0.014 0.063 0.015 0.068 0.036 0.324 0.006 0.032
AA2(1.3)6661.1 4272.8
rs11018529CC51(32.5)2433.1 518.7
TC74(47.1)1955.1 340.9 0.767 0.863 0.709 0.946 0.648 0.729 0.988 0.988
TT32(20.4)2600.2 578.9
rs11018537AA86(55.8)2294.6 343.5
AG56(36.4)1870.2 372.1 0.248 0.558 0.537 0.946 0.095 0.339 0.236 0.531
GG12(7.8)3647.9 1588.6
rs7104391AA75(50.3)2489.0 386.8
AG65(43.6)1904.1 376.1 0.484 0.653 0.839 0.946 0.230 0.339 0.521 0.782
GG9(6.0)1353.3 554.6
rs747571TT104(70.3)1915.2 281.1
TC40(27.0)2778.6 606.9 0.508 0.653 0.946 0.946 0.264 0.339 0.767 0.986
CC4(2.7)1187.9 793.9
rs11018720CC79(51.0)1923.2 330.9
CT64(41.3)2426.8 418.0 0.359 0.646 0.828 0.946 0.155 0.339 0.431 0.776
TT12(7.7)4174.5 1327.0
rs302647CC78(52.3)1841.8 319.8
CG59(39.6)2639.6 472.0 0.052 0.156 0.023 0.069 0.134 0.339 0.015 0.045
GG12(8.1)3328.6 1304.0
rs302646GG51(33.3)3497.8 595.2
AG72(47.1)1718.7 297.3 0.009 0.063 0.002 0.018 0.220 0.339 0.007 0.032
AA30(19.6)1361.7 439.7

All p-values were adjusted for age, glomerular filtration rate, and hypertension history. Significant values (p < 0.05) were in bold. The q value is the false discovery rate (FDR) estimation for multi-testing.

Table 5

Association analysis between RAB38 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the urine protein and creatinine ratio (UPCR) in the female cohort.

UPCRGenotypicDominantRecessiveLog-Additive
VariantGenotypeNumber(%)MeanSEp Valueq Valuep Valueq Valuep Valueq Valuep Valueq Value
rs9144TT48(43.6)764.9 186.8
CT48(43.6)1309.5 286.1 0.0810.7290.1090.4900.3610.8210.4780.645
CC14(12.7)676.5 270.6
rs1027027CC99(88.4)1024.5 160.6
CA12(10.7)208.5 60.6 0.4740.7830.2320.6380.5900.8600.2210.645
AA1(0.9)104.3 0.0
rs11018529CC37(32.7)1389.6 337.5
TC57(50.4)808.6 185.3 0.2170.7830.0870.4900.3650.8210.0980.645
TT19(16.8)769.3 267.9
rs11018537AA58(53.2)946.0 193.0
AG36(33.0)1004.2 297.1 0.8510.8620.6010.6760.6690.8600.5690.645
GG15(13.8)1062.8 478.7
rs7104391AA52(47.3)873.0 241.8
AG45(40.9)940.5 191.9 0.8620.8620.5900.6760.9220.9660.6590.659
GG13(11.8)1008.8 341.3
rs747571TT71(68.3)815.5 150.9
TC28(26.9)1290.8 401.1 0.5010.7830.3690.6380.6550.8600.5730.645
CC5(4.8)916.1 450.1
rs11018720CC64(56.1)912.1 165.4
CT42(36.8)1134.6 316.2 0.7140.8620.4250.6380.9660.9660.5110.645
TT8(7.0)766.9 452.5
rs302647CC53(50.0)942.1 184.9
CG39(36.8)906.9 272.6 0.3950.7830.7290.7290.1760.8210.3700.645
GG14(13.2)1539.8 624.6
rs302646GG41(36.0)1124.2 310.5
AG50(43.9)952.7 210.8 0.5220.7830.3980.6380.3030.8210.2630.645
AA23(20.2)820.6 228.4

All p-values were adjusted for age, glomerular filtration rate, and hypertension history. Significant values (p < 0.05) were in bold. The q value is the false discovery rate (FDR) estimation for multi-testing.

3.4. rs1027027, rs302647, rs302646 Are Not Associated with DN Susceptibility

To investigate the correlation between DN susceptibility and the UPCR-associated polymorphisms, we compared the genotype frequencies and allele frequencies between this study cohort and the general population from the Taiwan Biobank. For rs1027027, the genotype and allele frequencies were queried from the GWAS data (n = 24,625). For rs302647 and rs302646, for which the genome-wide genotyping data were not available, the genotype and allele frequencies data were queried from the DNA sequencing data (n = 1000). The association between SNPs and DN susceptibility was tested using Fisher’s exact test. However, no apparent differences were found. The results indicated that variants in RAB38 are not associated with DN susceptibility (Tables S1–S3). Statistical power for DN susceptibility analysis was calculated by a GASpower calculator using the following parameters: Numbers of cases/control were 265/24625 for rs1027027, 255/1000 for rs302647, and 267/1000 for rs302646. The significance level of this study design was 0.0167. Prevalence of DN was 0.179 based on a previous study [24]. Disease allele frequencies were 0.119, 0.282, and 0.559 for rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646, respectively. Furthermore, the genotype relative risk (GRR) is calculated based on the disease model for each SNP. The GRR in the dominant model were 0.811, 1.253, and 1.066 for rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646, respectively. The GRR in the recessive model were 0.922, 1.324, and 1.130 for rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646, respectively. Results further showed that the statistical power is inadequate for the susceptibility of DN. The statistical power of rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646 was 0.017, 0.256, and 0.024 in the dominant model, and 0.017, 0.078, and 0.066 in the recessive model, respectively.

3.5. rs1027027, rs302647, rs302646 Are Associated with RAB38 Expression in Different Tissues

To explore the functional role of UPCR-associated variants, we interrogated GTEx database V8 for the eQTL effects of these variants on RAB38 expression in different tissues. As shown in Table S4, the A allele at rs1027027, which was associated with higher UPCR levels in DN patients, is correlated with decreased RAB38 expression in esophagus mucosa. Similarly, the G allele at rs302646 is associated with lower RAB38 expression in various tissues. However, for rs302647, the G allele has a positive effect on RAB38 expression in a variety of tissues, including adipose, colon, nerve, heart, lung, and whole blood.

4. Discussion

Previous meta-analysis of GWAS demonstrated that variation of RAB38/CTSC was highly associated with UACR of European ancestry with diabetes [20]. Urine albumincreatinine ratio (UACR) and urine protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR) are important markers of kidney damage. Both UACR and UPCR have been utilized for prognosis in persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several studies demonstrated that UACR and UPCR are relatively comparable in their associations with common complications of CKD. Furthermore, they have similar predictive values of clinical endpoints, including all-cause mortality, initiation of renal replacement therapy, doubling of serum creatinine, and > 30% decline in eGFR [25,26,27]. However, UPCR showed a superior performance to UACR in the prediction of 24-h proteinuria and that can identify patients with high non-albumin proteinuria, who otherwise would not be diagnosed using UACR [27]. Here, we comprehensively screened the association of genetic variants on RAB38 with UPCR in DN patients and investigated the influence of gender on the association between genetic polymorphisms and UPCR. Three polymorphisms of RAB38 demonstrated significance with UPCR levels in DN patients, which are rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646. In rs1027027, the increment of A allele increases with the expression level of UPCR. Meanwhile, the increment of the G allele resulted in a higher expression level of UPCR in rs302647 and rs302646. RAB38 encodes a member of the small Rab GTPase protein family that regulates intracellular vesicle trafficking between organelles and is highly expressed in tubuli [28]. Cells that with Rab38 knockdown expressed a lower BSA-gold particle endocytosis phenomenon when compared to control cells. Rab38-KO models also demonstrated more heavy proteinuria and albuminuria, whereas the observed phenotypes were successfully rescued in transgenic Rab38 models [29]. According to Teumer at al., the immunohistochemistry staining results of the diabetic Rab38 knockout mice showed a lower expression of cubilin and megalin, which decreased the amount of albumin reabsorption by the proximal tubule and increased urinary albumin excretion. [20]. Another study also demonstrated that disrupted Rab38 gene associates with the malabsorption of filtered albumin, possibly owing to aberrant intracellular vesicular trafficking for megalin and cubilin receptors [30]. This is consistent with our observation regarding the eQTL effect of rs1027027 and rs302646 on RAB38 expression in different tissues. The alleles at rs1027027 and rs302646 that correlated with decreased RAB38 expression are associated with elevated UPCR levels in DN patients. Contrarily, rs302647 that corresponded to the same situation was discovered with lower UPCR levels in DN patients. However, none of the significant eQTL effects were observed in renal tissue. It may be due to the limited availability of kidney tissues in the database. Further studies are needed to clarify the effect of these variants on renal tissues. Synthesized in the liver, albumin functions as a protein carrier for a myriad of substances and also contributes to oncotic pressure in the plasma, which is necessary for proper fluid balance and homeostasis [31]. Most albumins are not able to pass through the glomerulus; those that filtered through are majorly reabsorbed via a proximal convoluted tubule, loop of Henle and distal convoluted tubule [32]. Megalin and cubilin, as multiligand endocytic receptors, bind to miscellaneous substances in the ultrafiltrate and mediate their reabsorption, including albumins. Despite the fact that albumins can bind with either receptor, it is generally considered that albumins first bind with cubilin. Then, megalin is required to proceed with internalization or endocytosis because cubilin lacks the intracellular cytoplasmic tail component, which enhances intracellular transport. Impaired RAB38 function may lead to increased albumin excretion via different mechanisms: altered intracellular vesicle transport may affect albumin reabsorption or the recycling of reabsorbed albumin back to the plasma membrane [33]. It may affect the delivery of proteins required, such as cubilin or megalin, for albumin endocytosis [34]. It may also directly cause glomerular damage leading to increased concentrations of urinary albumin. Therefore, reduced expression or loss of the cubilinmegalin complex may contribute to albuminuria of early diabetic kidney disease via reduced tubular reuptake of filtered albumin, which was supported by the observed association of rs1801239 with incident and persistent microalbuminuria in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study [35]. The male population was previously reported to be more susceptible to DN progression compared to females for type 2 DM [36]. Our study revealed a difference in the association between gender and UPCR levels for the variant of rs1027027, rs302647 and rs302646. The log-additive model reached a statistically significant threshold after multiple testing corrections; analysis for only the male population maintain significance, while no significance was found in the female subset analysis. Some studies that indicated a gender difference in prevalence and incidence for CKD and even ESRD, using eGFR as the phenotype, confounding factors include blood pressure, hormonal status, diets, smoking, alcohol intake, obesity, age and perhaps ethnicity. Males seem to be more likely to develop ESRD as there is a 10-year delay in females to progress to ESRD from CKD. Dialysis therapy was also more pervasive in men than in women [37]. Thus, male sex is likely to be more liable to renal function deterioration. In concordance with higher DN susceptibility toward males and lower for females in type 2 DM patients, males were characterized with low androgen levels (especially serum total testosterone); females were marked with high estrogen levels and high dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels. [38]. Postmenopausal women with lower estrogen levels but that had received estrogen replacement therapy exerted positive effects by reducing proteinuria [39]. As for men, the testosterone replacement treatment improved metabolic disorders to some extent but its impact on DN is still unavailable. This gives a hint towards the protective attribute of estrogen within females. In the current study, the genetic variants associated with higher proteinuria in DN patients, but were more apparent in a male population (Table 4 and Table 5). However, it is uncertain whether the genetic variants we found contribute to the phenomenon of worse DN status in the male sex. In addition, there are some limitations of this study. Firstly, we noticed the inconsistent results on the level of UPCR and DN susceptibility. The genetic influence of rs1027027, rs302647, and rs302646 was found in UPCR but not in DN susceptibility. The negative findings might be due to the small sample size that limits the statistical power. A larger cohort or replication studies in different populations are required to validate our findings. Secondly, we had to abandon rs3740925 because its primer fails to pass the quality control and there is no substitute SNP in this study. Thirdly, some important confounding factors are unmeasured and cannot be adjusted in the analysis, this may have a certain degree of influence when determining the genetic risk for DN.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we found that the A allele of rs1027027 and G allele of rs302647 and rs302646 were significantly associated with UPCR levels, which were susceptible to diabetic nephropathy in a Taiwanese population. Analysis stratified by gender presented that the male gender showed a statistically significant relation to the UPCR level. These findings highlight a novel genetic susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. Further investigation in a larger sample size would be needed to validate the findings in this study.
  35 in total

Review 1.  Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic.

Authors:  Harald Stenmark
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Reduced albumin reabsorption in the proximal tubule of early-stage diabetic rats.

Authors:  A Tojo; M L Onozato; H Ha; H Kurihara; T Sakai; A Goto; T Fujita; H Endou
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 3.  Epidemiology, impact and preventive care of chronic kidney disease in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shang-Jyh Hwang; Jer-Chia Tsai; Hung-Chun Chen
Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 4.  Genome-wide studies to identify risk factors for kidney disease with a focus on patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Florina Regele; Kira Jelencsics; Dov Shiffman; Guillaume Paré; Matthew J McQueen; Johannes F E Mann; Rainer Oberbauer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  The Genetic Landscape of Renal Complications in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Niina Sandholm; Natalie Van Zuydam; Emma Ahlqvist; Thorhildur Juliusdottir; Harshal A Deshmukh; N William Rayner; Barbara Di Camillo; Carol Forsblom; Joao Fadista; Daniel Ziemek; Rany M Salem; Linda T Hiraki; Marcus Pezzolesi; David Trégouët; Emma Dahlström; Erkka Valo; Nikolay Oskolkov; Claes Ladenvall; M Loredana Marcovecchio; Jason Cooper; Francesco Sambo; Alberto Malovini; Marco Manfrini; Amy Jayne McKnight; Maria Lajer; Valma Harjutsalo; Daniel Gordin; Maija Parkkonen; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Valeriya Lyssenko; Paul M McKeigue; Stephen S Rich; Mary Julia Brosnan; Eric Fauman; Riccardo Bellazzi; Peter Rossing; Samy Hadjadj; Andrzej Krolewski; Andrew D Paterson; Jose C Florez; Joel N Hirschhorn; Alexander P Maxwell; David Dunger; Claudio Cobelli; Helen M Colhoun; Leif Groop; Mark I McCarthy; Per-Henrik Groop
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Loss of chloride channel ClC-5 impairs endocytosis by defective trafficking of megalin and cubilin in kidney proximal tubules.

Authors:  Erik I Christensen; Olivier Devuyst; Geneviève Dom; Rikke Nielsen; Patrick Van der Smissen; Pierre Verroust; Michèle Leruth; William B Guggino; Pierre J Courtoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  Human serum albumin homeostasis: a new look at the roles of synthesis, catabolism, renal and gastrointestinal excretion, and the clinical value of serum albumin measurements.

Authors:  David G Levitt; Michael D Levitt
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2016-07-15

8.  Predictive value of spot versus 24-hour measures of proteinuria for death, end-stage kidney disease or chronic kidney disease progression.

Authors:  Tracey Ying; Philip Clayton; Chetana Naresh; Steven Chadban
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Genome-Wide Association and Trans-ethnic Meta-Analysis for Advanced Diabetic Kidney Disease: Family Investigation of Nephropathy and Diabetes (FIND).

Authors:  Sudha K Iyengar; John R Sedor; Barry I Freedman; W H Linda Kao; Matthias Kretzler; Benjamin J Keller; Hanna E Abboud; Sharon G Adler; Lyle G Best; Donald W Bowden; Allison Burlock; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Shelley A Cole; Mary E Comeau; Jeffrey M Curtis; Jasmin Divers; Christiane Drechsler; Ravi Duggirala; Robert C Elston; Xiuqing Guo; Huateng Huang; Michael Marcus Hoffmann; Barbara V Howard; Eli Ipp; Paul L Kimmel; Michael J Klag; William C Knowler; Orly F Kohn; Tennille S Leak; David J Leehey; Man Li; Alka Malhotra; Winfried März; Viji Nair; Robert G Nelson; Susanne B Nicholas; Stephen J O'Brien; Madeleine V Pahl; Rulan S Parekh; Marcus G Pezzolesi; Rebekah S Rasooly; Charles N Rotimi; Jerome I Rotter; Jeffrey R Schelling; Michael F Seldin; Vallabh O Shah; Adam M Smiles; Michael W Smith; Kent D Taylor; Farook Thameem; Denyse P Thornley-Brown; Barbara J Truitt; Christoph Wanner; E Jennifer Weil; Cheryl A Winkler; Philip G Zager; Robert P Igo; Robert L Hanson; Carl D Langefeld
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The genetics of diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Eoin Brennan; Caitríona McEvoy; Denise Sadlier; Catherine Godson; Finian Martin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.